Posted on 06/25/2006 4:55:14 AM PDT by Dane
Also all polls were taken before Jacob said that satan was thwarting his campaign because he couldn't raise campaign funds remark.
ping
It's amazing to me that a plurality favors amnesty, especially in Utah.
So is your saying crystal ball saying Jacob's religious remark will hurt him in the polls? In a religious district no less? Sounds mighty liberal of you. We'll have to wait and see won't we.
Except for the flawed Deseret Morning News one those polls are looking good for Jacob considering all the undecideds and the fact he was/is a relative unknown. Plus he's debating Monday against that clown you support, which may sway even more to his side.
the thing is that Jacob(satan is thwarting my campaign) has his own amnesty plan called fast pass.
Yep kinda of takes the air out of some on FR's rhetoric, especially since the 3rd district is one of the most conservative in the nation.
It was a straightforward question poll and not a lou dobb's push poll.
Wrong again. That poll reflects the attitudes of liberals as well. Poll strictly Republicans then see what the results are. I'll bet they're different and those are the ones the House has to look at.
Well you can be endorsed by business dot com failure lou dobb's, I'd rather be endorsed by James Sensenbrenner as Chris Cannon has.
Again, it's the new, detailed Cannon - a good thing, says House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis. "What I can say is, in Congress there are workhorses and showhorses," Sensenbrenner says. "Chris Cannon is the workhorse. Workhorses get things done in Congress."
A hit piece lol?? That's a good one Dane. The picture and his quotes speak for themselves.
The poll reflects the attitudes of those who reside in Utah's 3rd district and in one of the most conservative districts in the country, the issue of immigration is spilt down the middle.
The poll reflects everyone in the district, not just conservatives. Survey just them then see what the results are.
Hmm let me see, who would I rather have the support of, a respected Congressman such as James Sensenbrenner, or a failed dot com business journalist hack who works for the most liberal news network, lou dobbs.
I'll go with James Sensenbrenner.
The second one is only somewhat better, in that it polled "voters."
What one wants is "likely voters," and in this case, "likely Republican voters."
It seems odd to me that the polling firms aren't narrowing it down in this way. But we see this sort of thing all the time in polls...I assume it's because more accurate polls are more expensive to do.
And that district(3-UT) is one of the most conservative in the nation.
And the second poll with a 9% margin of error in polling in one county is "legitimate".
A 9% margin of error in the polling world is considered junk.
But it looks like you wish to beleive the polls the polls you want to beleive.
I didn't express an opinion on the race; I was only talking about the poor state of polling in this and other races.
You really do come up with the strangest of strawmen Dane.
Hhhmm let me see, who would I rather have the support of, Bob Lonsberry, a respected conservative in Utah or La Raza, a racist, separatist organization?
Well then don't pick and choose, you should have ststed all the polls are junk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.