Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order: Protecting the Property Rights of the American People
The White House ^ | June 23, 2006 | Office of the press secretary

Posted on 06/23/2006 3:04:01 PM PDT by DaveTesla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-303 next last
To: pollyannaish

I've been frustrated with this place lately. Did you know, Bush has an in with 'big desert'?


61 posted on 06/23/2006 3:44:27 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Compensations isn't what I was addressing;

You were addressing federal takings for federal highways. Nothing has changed. Why would you expect it to change?

Interstates couldn't expand if he restricted federal highway eminent domain proceedings.

62 posted on 06/23/2006 3:44:34 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Okie_Eagle

All it basically does is state that the executive branch will make a nuisance of itself to anyone it catches in the act of an unreasonable exercise of imminent domain on GWB's watch.

That's really all he can do, short of getting Congress to passa a law.


63 posted on 06/23/2006 3:46:25 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA
We as a people of the United States have an obligation to
continue to make this issue heard.
Pressure the White House and Congress.
Only then can we expect a resolution.
Many laws are being passed at the state level.
On other words SCREAM AT THE TOP OF YOUR LUNGS.
The mere fact that this order was signed means there
is interest in the White House. With out private property
rights in this country who would invest time and money in
anything if it could be just taken away?
64 posted on 06/23/2006 3:46:29 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
and not merely for the purpose of advancing the economic interest of private parties

Is a town considered a private party?

65 posted on 06/23/2006 3:48:56 PM PDT by rocksblues (Liberals will stop at nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish; Indy Pendance

The President had several options in forming a response to Kelo.

He could have:
1. Pushed for an act of Congress to restrict the Federal Government's ED doctrine.
2. Publicly responded to Kelo and asked for state governments to restrict ED in their locales.
3. Done nothing.
4. Sign a piece of paper that can be rescinded on Jan 21st 2009 leaving the citizens of this country oppressed under Kelo when it comes to all future Kelo related ED takings.

The President has down some great politicking on the "ownership society" in the past, Kelo was a slap in the face to his personal, public, and political history, and he hasn't responded. Federal plans in N.O. and surrounding locales have the potential for the Fed gove to use ED in a major way to clear out flood plains, and this EO does what to protect local residents? Nothing really.

And I support heavy restrictions on rebuilding in NO.


66 posted on 06/23/2006 3:49:10 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I've been frustrated with this place lately. Did you know, Bush has an in with 'big desert'?

No, but let me toke up on some big giant bong and I'm sure that thought will float into my head also.

And I thought only the 'other side' was supposed to have conspiratorial kooks? We were supposed to be the sane ones.

67 posted on 06/23/2006 3:50:09 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Anything the gubmint doesn't own is privately owned.
I imagine that includes stockheld companies.


68 posted on 06/23/2006 3:50:10 PM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
If the abuse is mostly happening on the state and local levels, then that is where WE need to fight it. It is beginning to sound a little like the water cooler on a Sarandon/Baldwin shoot.

George Bush can't hold our hand on everything and do it all for us, nor would we want him to. Welfare state mentality is seeping in. Please grab the head and pull it gently out-- :-). Just chiding some who seem to have clamped their lips to the nipple today.

69 posted on 06/23/2006 3:50:39 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

President throws bone. Leftists chew one end, conservatives chew the other. Sort of like Millay's candle, it won't last long...but it looks lovely.


70 posted on 06/23/2006 3:51:43 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

I gather we are all supposed to be overjoyed ...


71 posted on 06/23/2006 3:51:50 PM PDT by Maeve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
"Is a town considered a private party?"

Ahh.. But the city's use convoluted excuses like tax revenue
to advance the interests of politically connected private parties.
72 posted on 06/23/2006 3:52:13 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"Plans for the Canadian, USA, Mexico Corridor (including any governmental confiscation for easements) remains intact."

I'm sure the usual suspects will be along shortly to explain why all of this is merely business as usual and poses no real sovereignty threats to the United States.

Our FR pretend-conservatives are even now going into the spin mode.

73 posted on 06/23/2006 3:53:04 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

>He just granted himself unconstitutional power. Just great<

Well, after all, he'll need it to build the NAFTA Super Highway, won't he? Arghhhhhh!


74 posted on 06/23/2006 3:53:55 PM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Um, that was a joke.


75 posted on 06/23/2006 3:54:49 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
Federal plans in N.O. and surrounding locales have the potential for the Fed gove to use ED in a major way to clear out flood plains, and this EO does what to protect local residents? Nothing really.

Unless it is for a federal project, the federal government would not do the taking. If the feds clear out flood plains to let the land lie vacant, then that would be a federal project, I guess, and subject to current law.

Kelo gave governments the power to do takings for private corporations for private interests. This EO prevents the feds from doing that, but not state or local governments.

76 posted on 06/23/2006 3:54:50 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
A good first step in righting SCOTUS' wrong.

Which happened one year ago today...my Birthday.

77 posted on 06/23/2006 3:55:08 PM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Maeve
I gather we are all supposed to be overjoyed ...

Well how about just try to stop all the incessant whining and griping 24/7! Good God, no good deed goes unpunished by the 'perpetually miserable' crowd@! Like a dark cloud hanging over everything.

78 posted on 06/23/2006 3:55:27 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
The next step would be to hand it over to the U.N.

It explicity states the federal government can convey land to an NGO, which is what the UN is, as is the NASCO supercorridor group, as is the Kansas City Smartport group.
79 posted on 06/23/2006 3:55:41 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

You did not read the order if you hope that state and local governments should follow.


80 posted on 06/23/2006 3:56:37 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson