Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Message for Parker: Stop Bullying (anti- David Parker hate mail)
Lexington Minuteman ^ | June 22, 2006 | Bill McKenney

Posted on 06/23/2006 5:51:54 AM PDT by lexfreedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: scripter
I don't know Parker's heart, but I have been on the receiving end of some very radical homosexual activists and can understand from where he's coming.

I agree! There is nothing comparable to the extremes a rabid homosexual agenda activist will go to in attempting to protect the propagandized delusional comfort zone necessary for maintaining the facade of homosexual normalcy... David Parker embodies ALL that the homosexual agenda activists fear and they are gunning for him big time!

41 posted on 06/23/2006 11:31:22 AM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

I dont hate homosexuals. In fact I feel kinda sorry for them. I dont even hate their perversions as long as they keep them amongst themselves. Do I hate perverts trying to convert kids into their sickness? Do I hate recruiters trying to teach elementary school kids that their sickness is normal? Youre damned right i do.


42 posted on 06/23/2006 11:45:55 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Rex Anderson
But the case was dropped in Oct. 2005, and he is innocent of any wrong doing. The trespass charge was dropped. The recent incident in the playground has been resolved. Is there any accounting of the donations? Why does he still need a "fund"?

Because a civil lawsuit was filed on April 27, 2006 against the school and the administrators that asks the court to

Order equitable and injunctive relief ordering that:
A. The plaintiff parents be expressly and clearly notified prior to any adult-directed or initiated classroom discussions of sexuality, gender identity, and marriage constructs, until such time as the children are in seventh grade. Such notification must be explicit about the content, given in a timely manner, and involve the written consent of parents to opt children into these presentations/discussions.

B. The plaintiff parents be presented with an opportunity to excuse the children from classroom presentations or discussions the intent of which is to have children accept the validity of, embrace, affirm, or celebrate views of human sexuality, gender identity, and marriage constructs.

C. The plaintiff parents be presented with an opportunity to excuse the children from classroom presentations or discussions when the intent is to have children accept the validity of, embrace, affirm or celebrate belief systems or religious perspectives.

D. The plaintiff parents be presented with an opportunity to attend, as silent observers, and record any school presentations or discussions of the aforementioned ideological/socialization perspectives.

E. That no materials graphically depicting homosexual physical contact be submitted to the students until the seventh grade, with the provisions of Sections 3A and 3C.

4. Order payment of compensatory damages to the extent allowed by law;

5. Order payment of special, exemplary, or punitive damages, to the fullest extent allowed by law;

6. Order payment of attorney's fees, expert fees, prejudgment interest, interest, costs and;

7. Provide such additional relief as the court deems just.

Link to lawsuit text

43 posted on 06/23/2006 11:49:19 AM PDT by lexfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Why is it my children can't offend his fellow students with the word "Jesus" and yet the teachers can offend my children with the word "Homosexual?"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Because Down on the Animal Farm school house the homosexual lobby pigs in the farmer's house and Christians live in the barn. ( Oink!)


44 posted on 06/23/2006 11:59:08 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom

ahhhhhhh lexington at it's finest!! The first letter of rebuttal was right on!


45 posted on 06/23/2006 12:12:55 PM PDT by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom

The guy writes press releases?


46 posted on 06/23/2006 12:15:02 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

We are Brilliant, believe me. Not all of us for the same reasons, unfortunately.


47 posted on 06/23/2006 12:15:11 PM PDT by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rex Anderson
What is wrong with people, when a father is unwilling to cut and run, but instead stays to fight the fight for the benefit of the whole school full of children? Many have left MA, and taken their kids out of the public schools, but they find once they do, they have no further legal standing, and their actions leave the kids still there just as at risk. Why is this man not lauded for his courage and trying to eliminate this indoctrination in schools, not to mention bring nationwide attention to it, instead of being accused by some of trying to make money from the whole ugly mess. The money is a legal fund, NOT for income.
48 posted on 06/23/2006 12:21:48 PM PDT by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

Schools are community-based institutions and function according to community standards. After all, they are supported by local taxes.

This guy not only seems to be alone in his quest, but comes off as very, very annoying.


49 posted on 06/23/2006 12:25:29 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

>>Why is this man not lauded for his courage and trying to eliminate this indoctrination in schools, not to mention bring nationwide attention to it,<<

Because of his behavior.


50 posted on 06/23/2006 12:30:56 PM PDT by gondramB (Unity of freedom has never relied upon uniformity of opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Correct, the court would just rule that he had removed his child so what was his issue? The toher thing Parker is firmly standing behind, is the opt out LAW, which the school board and the superintendent weasel their way around and completely ignore. That law is being broken, and not only Mr. Parkers son is at risk because it is, all the children are.

Couple that with the fact that Mr. Parker is a working man, and it is not an easy cost of living in Lexington, so he probably cannot afford to live on only his own income, and have his wife homeschool. I could be mistaken, but I believe I read he was transferred, and that was what brought him to MA and Lexington.
51 posted on 06/23/2006 12:31:52 PM PDT by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: durasell

He isn't alone any longer, others have joined his suit. That happened after the reading of King and King was read to young children.

The man is just demanding that the school system follow the law. The law allows him to opt out, but the school continues to defy the law, and find ways around the wording of the law.

Anyone who doesn't understand, and say "it's about time someone stood up to the public schools", doesn't know how bad the schools have gotten. Mr. Parker may not have the ability to homeschool, or be able to afford private school. And he may just be unwilling to throw the rest of the children to the wolves. No matter how the Lexington news outlets spin the story, the bottom line is the law isn't being followed.


52 posted on 06/23/2006 12:43:26 PM PDT by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

If others have followed him then the problem is solved. The school board will be voted out come the next election. He can even run for the board himself.


53 posted on 06/23/2006 1:01:05 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson