Skip to comments.
Ninth Circuit Decides: The Mt. Soledad Cross Will Come Down, "Memorial Would Be Desecrated"
Thomas Moore Law Center ^
| June 22, 2006
| TMLC
Posted on 06/22/2006 1:44:05 PM PDT by RDTF
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
unbelievable
1
posted on
06/22/2006 1:44:07 PM PDT
by
RDTF
To: RDTF
Where do we send donations to fund their $5,000 a day bill?
:)
2
posted on
06/22/2006 1:46:17 PM PDT
by
weegee
To: RDTF
Take it to the Supremes. Better chance there than with the 9th Circus...
3
posted on
06/22/2006 1:46:20 PM PDT
by
el_texicano
(Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots all)
To: RDTF
Put the judges under the cross as they drop it.
4
posted on
06/22/2006 1:48:22 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: RDTF
They should sell the mountain to a private organization.
Like a church.
5
posted on
06/22/2006 1:48:40 PM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: RDTF
And yet the crescent "memorial" commemorating the 9-11 attacks continues.
6
posted on
06/22/2006 1:48:49 PM PDT
by
weegee
To: RDTF
Why couldn't, years ago, they have given the plot of land to someone for a $1 per year on the condition that no improvements be made upon it?
7
posted on
06/22/2006 1:49:23 PM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: RDTF
Two questions:
How do judges levy taxes like this,
and how do they collect them?
8
posted on
06/22/2006 1:49:25 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: RDTF
The Nutty Ninth strikes again
9
posted on
06/22/2006 1:50:03 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: mtbopfuyn
That's the really sick thing about it: It IS private!
10
posted on
06/22/2006 1:50:28 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: bmwcyle
The judges and atheists are hoping for this type of photo op:
Will they beat it with their shoes?
11
posted on
06/22/2006 1:50:49 PM PDT
by
weegee
To: RDTF
The liberal 9th Circuit court strikes again!
12
posted on
06/22/2006 1:53:06 PM PDT
by
garbageseeker
(Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
To: RDTF
In its decision, however, the Ninth Circuit scheduled oral arguments on the matter for the week of October 16, 2006, weeks after the Cross is to be removed.Should I infer from this that that would be an en banc hearing? If so, shouldn't they have stayed the lower court's order until the entire 9th has ruled? I'm not understanding what's gone on here.
13
posted on
06/22/2006 1:53:43 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: RDTF
What's more unbelievable:
>> Despite the fact that the ballot proposal passed by an astonishing 76% of the vote, State Court Judge Patricia Cowett ruled that Proposition A violated the California constitution. Her order is being appealed as well. <<
A Constitutional amendment is unconstitutional because the proposed constitution is different from the original. Duh, that's why we are changing it. If, however, the propsed constitution were not so different, however, courts would, and have, strike down the amendment for having no effect.
14
posted on
06/22/2006 1:54:27 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: RDTF
Sounds like a win for the Godless.
To: John Jorsett
I think a 3 judge panel ruled on it. I think the next step will be the entire 9th Circuit court
16
posted on
06/22/2006 1:55:22 PM PDT
by
garbageseeker
(Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
To: wolfcreek
This case seems headed for The Roberts' Court.
17
posted on
06/22/2006 1:55:59 PM PDT
by
sono
("May the Wings of Liberty never lose a feather." Jack Burton)
To: RDTF
It's the 9th Circus. Hopefully, the Supremes will slap them down pretty quickly.
18
posted on
06/22/2006 1:55:59 PM PDT
by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: RDTF
Oh, I see, this is viewed as "Congress making a law, establishing a religion".
Just how stupid do you have to be to make that leap?
20
posted on
06/22/2006 1:57:20 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson