Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official says father's view on gays didn't spark fight (David Parker insulted by Superintendent)
Boston Globe ^ | June 20, 2006 | Maria Sacchetti

Posted on 06/20/2006 5:54:24 PM PDT by lexfreedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 last
To: Peach

Whatever. I have already moved on to new topics (this is easy when discussions focus on topics and not attacking people, e.g. David Parker or myself). If you wish to post nothing substantively related to the article posted and instead continue with your inane personal attacks then do so here by yourself, you can even call it a crusade for truth and I promise not to attempt corrupting the delusion you enjoy...


141 posted on 06/22/2006 4:06:07 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68
Plainly, it is my opinion that David Parker's statements put his version somewhere between the two extremes and that his version possibly unlike the others is premised upon his son's version being more legitimate than any that contradict it...

There are many spins in this story from both extremes -here is but one> -- in essence, David Parker stated he felt this attack was related to his noteriety and opposition to the homosexual agenda in the school...

Note he feels it is possibly related -period... He could be wrong which is not a big deal...

However, there is a big difference between what David Parker has stated and what those attempting to dipsarage David Parker attribute to him e.g. specifically, the claims that David Parker stated that homosexual activist parents planned the attack...

142 posted on 06/22/2006 4:17:40 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Note he feels it is possibly related -period... He could be wrong which is not a big deal...

I really hope he comes out and says that at some point. If he did, I could accept that, and I imagine many more would too. But he did give interviews and I notice this attibuted to him:

According to Mr. Parker, school authorities determined from an investigation into the assault that the beating was indeed planned and premeditated.

Mr. Parker described the incident at the school saying:

"During the recess period, a group of 8-10 kids suddenly surrounded Jacob and grabbed him. He was taken around the corner of the school building out of sight of the patrolling aides, with the taunting and encouragement of other kids. Jacob was then positioned against the wall for what appeared to be a well planned and coordinated assault.”

According to Parker, his son related that one student in particular performed the actual physical assault while, “many children stood, watched silently, and did nothing as the beating commenced.”

"The group of kids surrounded Jacob and he was beaten and punched. Then, as he fell to the ground, another child was heard saying to the group of children, 'Now you all can finish him off,' and as he was down on his hands and knees, the beating continued on his back. Then, fortunately, one little girl ran to contact the oblivious playground aides to stop it.

"Four of the attackers were from Jacob's first-grade class; the others were from other classes at Estabrook.

"The teachers' aide apparently determined that since she could not see external bleeding, and since Jacob apparently was not hit in the face, she did not send him to she school nurse." The family was immediately notified of the incident.

Speaking to LifeSiteNews, Parker speculated that the cause of the attack is most likely what he called “displaced aggression.” “If children hear venomous things from their parents, the children do internalize this,” he said. "We also know that activist lesbian mothers and vehement anti-David Parker parents are spewing hateful, inflaming rhetoric, and probably also to their young children".

This was given to lifesite.net. It is very close to the version he gave to mass resistance too, though that one was far worse, and one he received attribution also. I think the kids especially would appreciate it if he reconsidered this. If he does, I would have a lot more respect for him, even after last year. But I think it's gone too far now for him to retract anything. Hopefully in the future he'll realize how inflamatory these things can be, especially where the kids are concerned.

Look at the reaction here when those stories first came out. People were ready for war. And I can understand it. Yes, sometimes a news site will elaborate. But all the stories from the "conservative" sites were pretty much the same, and David Parker gave the interviews. He now needs to come forward and either confirm or deny. He knows for sure whether it was just a friend of Jacob's. A lot of people fully support what he is doing, and he owes them the truth and nothing but.

143 posted on 06/22/2006 5:13:37 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson