Skip to comments.
Pentagon warns a North Korean missile launch would be 'provocative' (U.S. to Intercept?)
AFP (via Yahoo!) ^
Posted on 06/19/2006 10:39:00 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-204 last
To: Rutles4Ever
If we try to shoot it down and fail, it will embolden the North Koreans.
The CIA / Delta Force shoulf blow it up on the launch pad and be sure to take out the scientists working on it. Of course, I'm not opposed to an "Arc-Light" strike by B-52s to take it out or a tactical nuclear strike.
To: GrandEagle
You were originally speaking of working with several variations of the AIM-9; so I was wracking my brain over that one as all I remembered (40 years ago, right?) was the AIM-3, AIM-4 and AIM-21 series.
Then it finally hit me...the AIM-9 missiles were the SIDEWINDERS, not the Falcons. Sidewinders were about 9ft long, and only about 5 inches in diameter...usually white. The Falcons were generally about 5-6ft long and about 7" in diameter, and were usually painted orange, orange/white, or just white for the Nukes.
Ouch, all that remembering hurts my brain....anyway, as sophisticated as the Falcons were, they were playtoys compared to today's smart bombs and other missiles.
However, missile guidance was a good lesson in life, as in: "You can never hit your target without a few errors (error signals).".
202
posted on
06/21/2006 3:22:49 PM PDT
by
FrankR
(democrats don't oppose Republicans...democrats oppose AMERICA...)
To: The Sons of Liberty
"Of course, I'm not opposed to an "Arc-Light" strike by B-52s to take it out or a tactical nuclear strike."
SLCM to get the target site, and assembly site, with small tac weapon. Airburst Pyongyang to destroy their electronic communication, the Communists are top-down strategists and cannot move when the brain is dead.
We should NOT tip our hand about B61 warhead on the Kinetic Kill Vehicles "Star Wars" by intercept. Just from all NONCLASSIFIED INFORMATION I expect that the "KKV" with 5kt-10kt weapon can wreck anything within 1 km, and EMR will destroy components within 25-50 km. Satellites and ground electronics is too far away to destroy. But someone will whine about stupid treaty. So no.
203
posted on
06/21/2006 7:15:16 PM PDT
by
Nickey
(Loose Lips Sink Ships.)
To: FrankR
Then it finally hit me...the AIM-9 missiles were the SIDEWINDERS
Sorry, I should have expounded a bit.
We had the Falcons in tech school, and I actually got to work on (more like work with the guys working on) a Falcon variant in Panama City, FL. They were pretty cool. You actually got to work on the guts of the missile with them.
Most of my work was the AIM-9 (sidewinders) and the AIM-7 (sparrow), AGM-65 (Maverick), and the AGM-45 (Can't remember). Also worked with LGB (laser guided bombs).
With the 9's we were pretty much component changers, Guidance unit, warhead, influence fuse, etc. With the 7's there was some "unofficial" tweaking you could do if your unit had a printer to attach to the test set. The printer actually printed the error signal instead of just the test set's go/no go lights.
I worked with the F-4, F-15, & F-111's mostly.
Thanks for the stroll down memory lane! Many fond memories,
Cordially,
GE
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-204 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson