Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon warns a North Korean missile launch would be 'provocative' (U.S. to Intercept?)
AFP (via Yahoo!) ^

Posted on 06/19/2006 10:39:00 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 last
To: Rutles4Ever
If we try to shoot it down and fail, it will embolden the North Koreans.

The CIA / Delta Force shoulf blow it up on the launch pad and be sure to take out the scientists working on it. Of course, I'm not opposed to an "Arc-Light" strike by B-52s to take it out or a tactical nuclear strike.

201 posted on 06/20/2006 6:00:14 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Former SAC Trained Killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
You were originally speaking of working with several variations of the AIM-9; so I was wracking my brain over that one as all I remembered (40 years ago, right?) was the AIM-3, AIM-4 and AIM-21 series.

Then it finally hit me...the AIM-9 missiles were the SIDEWINDERS, not the Falcons. Sidewinders were about 9ft long, and only about 5 inches in diameter...usually white. The Falcons were generally about 5-6ft long and about 7" in diameter, and were usually painted orange, orange/white, or just white for the Nukes.

Ouch, all that remembering hurts my brain....anyway, as sophisticated as the Falcons were, they were playtoys compared to today's smart bombs and other missiles.

However, missile guidance was a good lesson in life, as in: "You can never hit your target without a few errors (error signals).".
202 posted on 06/21/2006 3:22:49 PM PDT by FrankR (democrats don't oppose Republicans...democrats oppose AMERICA...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

"Of course, I'm not opposed to an "Arc-Light" strike by B-52s to take it out or a tactical nuclear strike."

SLCM to get the target site, and assembly site, with small tac weapon. Airburst Pyongyang to destroy their electronic communication, the Communists are top-down strategists and cannot move when the brain is dead.

We should NOT tip our hand about B61 warhead on the Kinetic Kill Vehicles "Star Wars" by intercept. Just from all NONCLASSIFIED INFORMATION I expect that the "KKV" with 5kt-10kt weapon can wreck anything within 1 km, and EMR will destroy components within 25-50 km. Satellites and ground electronics is too far away to destroy. But someone will whine about stupid treaty. So no.


203 posted on 06/21/2006 7:15:16 PM PDT by Nickey (Loose Lips Sink Ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Then it finally hit me...the AIM-9 missiles were the SIDEWINDERS
Sorry, I should have expounded a bit.
We had the Falcons in tech school, and I actually got to work on (more like work with the guys working on) a Falcon variant in Panama City, FL. They were pretty cool. You actually got to work on the guts of the missile with them.
Most of my work was the AIM-9 (sidewinders) and the AIM-7 (sparrow), AGM-65 (Maverick), and the AGM-45 (Can't remember). Also worked with LGB (laser guided bombs).
With the 9's we were pretty much component changers, Guidance unit, warhead, influence fuse, etc. With the 7's there was some "unofficial" tweaking you could do if your unit had a printer to attach to the test set. The printer actually printed the error signal instead of just the test set's go/no go lights.
I worked with the F-4, F-15, & F-111's mostly.

Thanks for the stroll down memory lane! Many fond memories,

Cordially,
GE
204 posted on 06/22/2006 5:51:27 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson