Skip to comments.
Google Search Trends Show Danes, Australians, Canada Interested in Intelligent Design
Google Search ID Trend History ^
| 06/16/2006
Posted on 06/16/2006 10:49:26 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 321-332 next last
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
241
posted on
08/30/2006 7:23:24 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
To: PatrickHenry
242
posted on
08/30/2006 7:25:15 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
243
posted on
08/31/2006 10:44:15 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
To: PatrickHenry
Has Links ever actually denied being Dembski?
244
posted on
08/31/2006 10:48:11 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: js1138
No. Hasn't said much at all.
245
posted on
08/31/2006 10:52:04 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
To: PatrickHenry
I asked him point blank on Aug 3, and he said the question was irrelevant. Since then he's been mostly absent, except for some really long quotes from Dembski, and some arguments that sound really familiar.
It's possible that he is an associate, possibly even Dembski's webmaster.
246
posted on
08/31/2006 11:00:54 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: js1138
It's possible that he is an associate, possibly even Dembski's webmaster. He could be Dembski; he could be Dembski's roommate; or he could be a plagiarist. There may be other explanations. We just don't know.
247
posted on
08/31/2006 11:15:48 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
To: PatrickHenry
I've looked at some of his other posts. It's Dembski or a groupie. Someone who has all the arguments and verbal mannerisms down pat.
248
posted on
08/31/2006 11:17:48 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: js1138
I'm sticking with the roommate theory. It's as good as any other, until we get some information from the source.
249
posted on
08/31/2006 11:21:02 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
To: PatrickHenry
I don't think I want to touch that one.
250
posted on
08/31/2006 11:28:24 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: PatrickHenry
If he is Dembski, does it count as plagiarism if he re-presents his ideas without representation under a different name? Oh the confusion!
251
posted on
08/31/2006 11:30:15 AM PDT
by
ahayes
("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
To: PatrickHenry; SirLinksalot
"We haven't" bump
And neither has my roommate.
252
posted on
08/31/2006 10:26:05 PM PDT
by
dread78645
(Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645; ahayes
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
253
posted on
09/01/2006 4:04:54 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645; ahayes
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
254
posted on
09/02/2006 4:13:53 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645; ahayes
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
255
posted on
09/03/2006 4:11:50 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Where are the anachronistic fossils?)
To: PatrickHenry; SirLinksalot
256
posted on
09/03/2006 4:50:51 AM PDT
by
dread78645
(Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645; ahayes
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
257
posted on
09/04/2006 4:24:54 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Where are the anachronistic fossils?)
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645; ahayes
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
258
posted on
09/05/2006 3:39:14 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Where are the anachronistic fossils?)
To: VadeRetro; longshadow; js1138; Condorman; Virginia-American; dread78645; ahayes
Daily Plagiarism bump
"Lest we forget"
|
|
|
259
posted on
09/06/2006 4:09:42 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Where are the anachronistic fossils?)
To: PatrickHenry; SirLinksalot
260
posted on
09/07/2006 12:23:56 AM PDT
by
dread78645
(Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 321-332 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson