Skip to comments.
Google Search Trends Show Danes, Australians, Canada Interested in Intelligent Design
Google Search ID Trend History ^
| 06/16/2006
Posted on 06/16/2006 10:49:26 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-332 next last
To: SirLinksalot
The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.
2
posted on
06/16/2006 11:00:16 AM PDT
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: SirLinksalot
3
posted on
06/16/2006 11:47:54 AM PDT
by
bkepley
To: SirLinksalot
Why are you plagiarizing Dumbski's bad math?
4
posted on
06/16/2006 11:56:59 AM PDT
by
balrog666
(There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
To: SirLinksalot
Of course, it could also mean that people around the world are curious about the ongoing dumbification of the US citizenry - much like watching a slow train wreck.
5
posted on
06/16/2006 11:59:18 AM PDT
by
blowfish
To: blowfish
6
posted on
06/16/2006 12:09:38 PM PDT
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: SirLinksalot
I found a very strange coincidence. Yesterday evening,
Doctor William Dembski on his Uncommon Descent posted the exact same thing you did.
And you know what is even stranger? You both did the same thing and you both made the same mistake. The Google search is already normalized. It is not correct to divide by the population again. So, people in other countries seem to be less interested in Intelligent Design than we in America are.
It's a shame he made that mistake, because he has a mathmatics Ph.D., and now people think he doesn't know any mathmatics. Also,the evolutionists are making fun of him. Anyone, even a brilliant mind like Doctor Dembski, can make a mistake.
But why didn't you give Doctor Dembski credit even though his math is all wrong?
To: HayekRocks
Maybe Sirlinksalot is Dembski. That would account for not only the bad math but the failure to attribute...
8
posted on
06/16/2006 12:33:36 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: SirLinksalot
Plagarism AND statistical ignorance all in one tidy package.
How convenient.
9
posted on
06/16/2006 12:35:09 PM PDT
by
Condorman
(Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
To: Junior
Maybe Sirlinksalot is Dembski.You're right. I retract my charge of plagarism pending positive identification of the poster in question.
10
posted on
06/16/2006 12:36:47 PM PDT
by
Condorman
(Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
To: HayekRocks
But why didn't you give Doctor Dembski credit even though his math is all wrong? I once had a creationist claim he was "working really hard" on a math proof that evolution was impossible. He kept promising to post it when he was done. Finally, after about a week, he posted the biggest load of manure I'd ever seen up to that point. And a Google search swiftly revealed that he had plagiarized it from some idiotic creationist website. When "his" work was exposed as being ripped off from another idiot, he vanished. So some creationists can be shamed.
11
posted on
06/16/2006 12:38:14 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: Junior; SirLinksalot
If so . . . Mr. Dembski, you should be ashamed of the way you misled Ms. Coulter!
12
posted on
06/16/2006 12:44:53 PM PDT
by
ahayes
("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
To: Junior
Maybe Sirlinksalot is Dembski. That would account for not only the bad math but the failure to attribute...That's gonna leave a mark.
13
posted on
06/16/2006 12:50:11 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: PatrickHenry
So some creationists can be shamed. Nah, they just get recycled under different screen names.
14
posted on
06/16/2006 12:52:19 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: ahayes; SirLinksalot; Junior
If so . . . Mr. Dembski, you should be ashamed of the way you misled Ms. Coulter! If so, this could be a very long and interesting thread.
15
posted on
06/16/2006 1:00:11 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death--Heinlein)
To: SirLinksalot
I'm actually surprised the interest isn't higher in Australia considering they have some of the more outspoken creationists there. But I guess they're more YEC and less ID, which, when it isn't being a YEC front, is more TE inclined.
16
posted on
06/16/2006 1:00:25 PM PDT
by
ahayes
("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
To: Junior
A lot of crickets in the background. Do you suppose the Panda got his thumb?
17
posted on
06/16/2006 1:03:59 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: SirLinksalot
The site linked exhibits some truly amusing errors of mathematics. Whoever wrote the original must have the benefit of a public school education. The author seems not to understand the term "normalization." It's a common failing among journalists.
18
posted on
06/16/2006 1:06:57 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: HayekRocks
Gosh, I better enroll at University of Chicago to add some lines to my CV. Even a comp geek like me should be able to get a Math PhD, especially since I already know the really complicated stuff - like normalization. *rolls eyes*
19
posted on
06/16/2006 1:08:07 PM PDT
by
anguish
(while science catches up.... mysticism!)
To: js1138
I noticed that too. You don't suppose we bracketed with the first salvo and scored a hit on the second?
20
posted on
06/16/2006 1:18:36 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-332 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson