Posted on 06/14/2006 3:57:43 PM PDT by wagglebee
The civil war and the kkk and segregation and blacks being bared from colleges and democrat opposition to the civil rights movement was more than enough to show that democrats and control of goverment are not a good thing to have combined, no matter what century you live in.
The little boy is in first grade. He should not have to endure attacks from the spawn of evil fascists. He is supposed to be in school to learn. His father needs to wake up. Public schools are indoctrination centers. Resistance will NOT be tolerated.
Dese wuz no "innocent black persons." Dese wuz punx.
fagots and liberals =vermin
Are there any rational democrats left anymore? I think when Zell Miller retired, he took the last shred of humanity and the last shadow of a soul with him, and now the democrat party has not a glimmer if either.
Seeing your post reminded me, I had someone fuss at me for calling them "queers" and it made me laugh. I asked them "Have you not seen a militant gay person the past few years? They openly and loudly call themselves that. If they call themselves that with a smile on national tv, why should I be shy about calling them that? People shouldn't call themselves something in public and then get offended when someone else calls them that same thing. What's even more humerous is the person that chastised me is a strait liberal who should have known that gays call themselves "queer" and "homos", and other things I won't post here. :) Liberals are so stupid. If braincells were Uranium isotopes, your standard package liberal wouldn't so much as lose a hair.
If you check out history in more detail in the 30s It was Rohm who was the leader of the Brownshirts and was a Homo. Who also wanted Hitler’s Job, Was behind the most ruthless attacks and corruption. As a matter of fact. Hitler was trying to rein in the ruthlessness of Rohm because he could see the bad PR it would generate.
Here's something we could use more of.
Poland Strikes Back Against Homosexual Education: Fires Teacher Responsible
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1649430/posts
Go to baltimore Harbor and see the Constellation.
The press release went out Wednesday (from what I gather on news.google.com).
Here is a report from Townhall.com.
http://www2.townonline.com/lexington/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=516786
Thanks for the link.
By the way, everyone seems to be assuming that the attackers were other first-graders. In none of the articles were their ages mentioned. They could be as old as 10 or so (5th-graders).
Mr Parker did not plan to have his son beat up when he began this fight. Let's not blame the victim here. When schools were being de-segegrated, black parents sent their children into dangerous situations too for a greater good.
It is unfortunate that this battle has to be fought but parents like the Parkers did not fire the first round. I don't know that I'd have the courage to make the kind of stand they did.
2 mooch eyeron?
Bad for the bursitis. Tomato skins and potato skins too. Love eggplant to eat, but fifteen minutes later my joints will be aflame.
He probably won't know. Why don't you ask me what my source is if you really want to know?
I'm a teacher too, and I said to start with that there was no way a competent playground monitor didn't know something was going on, especially with kids this age.
No I don't. Having said that, if Parker had taken any number of steps available to resolve his concerns other than arrest, I would agree. Once he insisted on being arrested at school, he should have removed his children from there. He left them to be taunted and humiliated at the least. That is unforgivable.
Is this the tolerant left I've heard so much about?
Wow, investigator, arresting officer, prosecutor, judge and jury. Pretty efficient. What if it really didn't happen at all?
He had every right to protest to the school, which he did. He refused the agreement and made a demand no one could agree to.
And it's MORE than unreasonable to expect that he would KNOW that this would happen. For Pete's sake! I sure wouldn't expect for adults to put kids up to beating up my kid like that!
No it isn't. Once he insisted on being arrested, he put his kids into a no win situation, subjecting them to ridicule and scorn at the very least. He should have at least moved them to another school. As for what really happened here, how do you know who put them up to it?
You puttin the blame on him is BEYOND stupid. Please don't talk to me. I already don't like you and don't wish to discuss this with someone who will blame the father for expecing that a school and other parents would respect his rights as aparent without having his kid beaten within an inch of his life. You're irrational. Don't speak to me.
You posted to me. I didn't post to you. You insult me and then tell me I can't speak to you? Please make sure you follow your own advice. BTW, I have no personal animosity toward you at all, since you actually believe what you read and are saying.
I did something most here didn't. I actually read all of the emails between the school and Mr. Parker. I read the police report. I read the interviews with both Parker and the school officials. In other words, I didn't just depend on anti-homosexual web sites for my information.
If you are there, and your kids does go to that schoo, then that means that you are likely one of the parents who doesn't mind a queer agenda book being force fed to six and seven year olds who are TOTALLY not psychologically developed enough to comprehend anything homosexual in nature.
Do you even know what was in the book? I would have told the school I did not want the book sent home. Apparently Parker was the only parent who did not get the information that the book would be sent home. Strange isn't it.
By the way, I thought you didn't want to talk to me anymore?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.