Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Can't Beat 50% Against Allen or Romney
Quinnipiac University ^ | June 5, 2006 | Peter Brown

Posted on 06/04/2006 11:22:46 PM PDT by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2006 11:22:51 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Hillary Clinton is done. You can stick a fork in her. There's virtually no chance that woman will ever be in the White House other than as an invited guest of the President.

Hopefully those invitations will be few and far between.

L

2 posted on 06/04/2006 11:30:33 PM PDT by Lurker (Real conservatives oppose the Presidents amnesty proposal. Help make sure it dies in the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Always remember, never forget,,,,She belongs in JAIL!!!!


3 posted on 06/04/2006 11:31:27 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Hillary Can't Beat 50% Against Allen or Romney

Is it just me, or does anyone else enjoy seeing the words "Hillary" and "beat" in the same sentence? Not that I would wish a beating upon anyone, mind you.

4 posted on 06/04/2006 11:32:15 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
There are not enough liberals in this country to get Hillary elected President. She's dead in the South. Kerry barely captured Fairfax County, Virginia. She Who Must Not Be Named would reverse even those tiny gains in a heartbeat. The Democrats have to decide between having a 100% liberal candidate as their standard-bearer or someone more moderate who's electable. And if its Hillary, no, it will not be enough to end the GOP hold on the White House in 2009.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

5 posted on 06/04/2006 11:32:39 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

All she needs is 40 to 44% or so and she will run. They are great campaigners and they could close the gap rapidly.


6 posted on 06/04/2006 11:38:42 PM PDT by grapeape ("If your attack is going too well, you're probably walking into an ambush.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grapeape
She's guaranteed to get at least 45%. I doubt she will get as many votes as Kerry because she's a more polarizing figure and this is a big plus - Bush will not be on the ballot then.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

7 posted on 06/04/2006 11:40:27 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The klinton trashbags usually gin up a 3rd party nut to split the vote. Only chance.


8 posted on 06/04/2006 11:41:31 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Hillary oozes arrogance. No way can she be a charismatic
contender. She's unlikable, has no original ideas, uninspiring
with bad legs.

NY did elect her Senator, though. Is the heartland as stupid?


9 posted on 06/04/2006 11:44:20 PM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurker; potlatch; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; Alamo-Girl






10 posted on 06/04/2006 11:46:37 PM PDT by devolve (fx AMERICANS_KILLED_IN_2003_BY_ILLEGALS FBI-DOJ_REPORT_4380+4745=9125 NO__NUEVO__TEJAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

LOL, not necessarily in that order.


11 posted on 06/04/2006 11:47:35 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
...except for the really left-wing types...

Notice how any story about "right-wing types" would have used knee-jerk libspeak like "extreme" or "radical" rather than the milder "really".

12 posted on 06/04/2006 11:49:24 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco
The klinton trashbags usually gin up a 3rd party nut to split the vote. Only chance.

From reading posts here, on FR, they may have hope.

13 posted on 06/04/2006 11:51:00 PM PDT by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
...and Al Gore essentially tied almost stole it in 2000.

Fixed it.

14 posted on 06/04/2006 11:52:04 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

If Mitt Romney a RINO virtually unknown outside of the NE can run a mere 11 points behind someone as well known as Hillary Clinton shows that millions of Americans despise her.


15 posted on 06/04/2006 11:54:19 PM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Interesting that romney runs much farther behind. I suspect its because republicans hear 'governor of massachusets'.

Most romney fans forget that his will be a big hurdle to overcome.


16 posted on 06/04/2006 11:56:16 PM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Ping..


17 posted on 06/04/2006 11:56:34 PM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

She may have hope if she gins up the third party votes and fools everyone else into thinking she's moderated, just like her repugnant husband.


18 posted on 06/04/2006 11:57:06 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Blast from the past, Jan, 2002, Fortune Magazine: The magazine says the ascendancy of Gore and Daschle relegates Sens. John Kerry of Massachusetts and John Edwards of N.C. "to the second tier of Democratic hopefuls." Stay tuned.

I don't think anyone's ever got it right as to who will emerge as the front runner two years out with anything other than blind luck. For all the whispers coming from Hilary's camp, it means nothing, not at this time.
19 posted on 06/04/2006 11:59:45 PM PDT by kingu (Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I don't know. Don't forget Slick Willie never got 50% of the vote and he got elected twice. The Clintons will be working overtime to create a third party movement for 2008.


20 posted on 06/05/2006 12:24:54 AM PDT by Roy Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson