Roy Moore, The Imperial Congress And The Rule Of Law

GOPUSA ^ | June 1, 2006 | Christopher G. Adamo

[GrandEagle]

Moore's going after Pryor is the reason that he won't be elected Governor.
That very well could be. However, Pryor has too many sides of his mouth that he speaks from. I would hate to have him in the federal judiciary. Just when you depend on him, if politically expedient, he will turn.
I was there, heard him with my own ears - not through the news. Make all the excuses you want - he can't be trusted.

GE

[ifinnegan]

Is this still your position?

“He is a demagogue who is strongly supported by trial lawyers in this state, and that’s the undisputed record.

While I am certainly sympathetic with his position on the 10 commandments, I cannot follow his Man from La Mancha approach of defying court orders.

Isn’t that what the San Francisco Mayor did when he performed gay marriages — he made his own decision the the state law was unconstitutional.

What if liberal judges start ignoring Supreme Court orders on gay marriage, prayer in public places, etc.

The result would be SHEER CHAOS!

The proper way to go about this is to petition our elected representatives to change the law, and elect or encourage the appointment of judges who follow the rule of law.

If Moore thinks as the judge of an inferior (i.e., lower) court that he has the right to defy the orders of the Supreme Court, then why as a litigant should I follow any order he enters with which I disagree?

Again, Moore’s position will lead to chaos and anarchy. “

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1641674/posts?page=11#11