Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: Dead Candidate Walking?
The American Thinker ^ | May 31, 2006 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 05/31/2006 5:46:15 AM PDT by Quilla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: LurkLongley

The elite moonbeams of the MSM keep thinking that this is 1992 and 1996, and they can "elect" any rat they want as president.

A quick scan of this thread shows those days are long gone.

The MSM will be even weaker when 2008 rolls around. So their elite plans should be destroyed again like the CBS/Rather/Mapes attempted 2004 electronic coup re their fiction about GW and the TANG.


81 posted on 05/31/2006 7:08:33 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
"Hillary will be their nominee whether they like it or not."

...or the detractors will be eliminated one by one. Hitlery will prevail all others will die. Amen.
82 posted on 05/31/2006 7:08:47 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Hillary is a lousy campaigner & public speaker. The longer she is in the spotlight, the harder this will be to hide from the poor, blind Democratic voters. Hillary's best hope is for another "Listening Campaign" like her first run for Senate -- but this will be impossible to re-create in all its detail. Instead she needs a front-runner who can be counted on to self-destruct. Gore might be that guy. We can assume that Hillary has enough dirt on him to destroy him at will anyway.

My prediction: Hillary trails along in Big Al's wake until the big primary states come in, then makes her move. Hillary needs a sprint, not a marathon.

83 posted on 05/31/2006 7:16:16 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

Especially if J effin K was his running mate.


84 posted on 05/31/2006 7:17:30 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gakrak

LOL


85 posted on 05/31/2006 7:21:00 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

"Hillary is a lousy campaigner & public speaker."

Very true. As Rush says, she sounds like your ex-wife, very shrill. The more she speaks the better. I'm not afraid of her or that lunatic Algore.


86 posted on 05/31/2006 7:22:14 AM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

"The New Al Gore." What a hoot! Hilary or Gore, they're both certified losers.


87 posted on 05/31/2006 7:23:07 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Deep down inside the recesses of Emperor Billigula's depraved mind, there MUST be the fear that if Hillary WERE ever elected President, that she might be more successful than he was.

I would bank on that. He does not want to be the first lady.

88 posted on 05/31/2006 7:24:43 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame
I'm not afraid of her (Hillary) or that lunatic Algore.

I don't think that either can win the General Election. The intra-party squabble will be entertaining. Both are dirty campaigners and will be sliming eachother. Al won't go down easily.

89 posted on 05/31/2006 7:37:28 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: LurkLongley

Can you just IMAGINE the NASTINESS the left will have to resort to using if Condi runs? If Hitlery runs against Condi, then H will have the feminists votes, but if Condi runs against a man, then I'm not sure how the feminists would vote. I'm sure it would rest on the candidates' position on abortion. I don't know Condi's position on that issue.

How will black Dems vote if a black woman has a good chance of becoming the next president? Difficult to know.
If there is a good chance of a "crossover" then the Dems will pull out all the stops in a NASTY campaign against Condi.


90 posted on 05/31/2006 7:39:52 AM PDT by Muzzle_em (taglines are for sissies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: joylyn

I can't ever see him as a Senator. Too many restrictions on his quest toward earning more $$ than he can ever spend and he'd go nuts being one of 50.
I doubt the Beast enjoys being a senator. It was her steppingstone toward her ultimate goal. I'm sure she looks down on each and every one of her colleagues.


91 posted on 05/31/2006 7:45:53 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: spatso

Careful when you use "Gore" and "weight" in the same sentence.


92 posted on 05/31/2006 7:49:50 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jslade
How can you make THIS look good?

Even without the morph......it's still scary. She's a hard looking woman and all the make-up artists in the world can't take the edge off of thatdl.
93 posted on 05/31/2006 8:11:45 AM PDT by Ptaz (Take Personal Responsibility--it's not fun, but it's the right thing to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: edpc

LOLO,thats a good picture for two reasons. Number one the kids size and number two if you notice the ball is already in the catchers glove and the kid is still looking for it.

Bery Apt.


94 posted on 05/31/2006 8:21:58 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Better yet, he's not a kid. He's an adult in his mid-twenties, 3ft 7in Eddie Gaedel.


95 posted on 05/31/2006 8:28:06 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
 

The pre-Memorial Day week began poorly for the Clintons, as one of their major media cheerleaders, Chris Matthews...




Good analysis... but wrong about Matthews.

He's hardly a hillary booster.

Chris Matthews is a party loyalist who's always seen hillary clinton as a sure loser.("Pee Wee Herman would give her a race,")

He's been throwing bombs at her for the better part of a year, now.

HEAR CHRIS MATTHEW + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY

by Mia T, 11.20.05





'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?

by Mia T, 02.02.06

KARL ROVE'S MAGNIFICENT OBSESSION: MOI
HEAR HILLARY, CHRIS MATTHEWS ET AL.

 


by Mia T, 2.28.06

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
BEHEARTED KARL adapted from ilovekarlrove.com graphic


 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005


96 posted on 05/31/2006 1:07:43 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON



QUID PRO COAL2:
CLINTON CORRUPTION + THE SEQUESTRATION OF GASEOUS FOSSILS

(HILLARY DOES COAL AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB)



Nina Burleigh: Do the Right Thing, Hillary



97 posted on 05/31/2006 1:09:52 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Moreover, the premise of Joe Klein's new book is that loser politicians like hillary clinton--and her handlers--have killed American politics.

He's not pro-hillary by any stretch of the imagination.

This conservative columnist is stereotyping the left in much the same way the leftist media stereotypes the right.


98 posted on 05/31/2006 1:20:35 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Foolish or deceptive??? Exactly what do you think the Senate immigration bill is all about? Do you for one moment think liberal politicians have not made it a practice of winning elections with illegal votes, citizens or NOT?? The dead have as much standing in political elections as the living.


99 posted on 06/01/2006 4:44:33 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Contrary to your paranoia the Senate Bill is NOT about setting up Illegals to vote. It is about many other things some reasonable some not.

The rest of your post veers into other areas and has mixed applicability. But you should understand that voter fraud is NOTHING NEW in American history.

But rather than attack the party which fosters it and gains power through it we watch "conservatives" attack the GOP. Pitiful.


100 posted on 06/01/2006 7:54:56 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson