HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR: proliferation in the age of clinton

National Press Club, C-SPAN, The New York Times, Richard Miniter | 5.31.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[ncountylee]

Hard to imagine the type of ego that would sell out one's country for the chance of winning a prize that had become a joke once Jimmy Cater (among other despicable people) was a recipient.

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[garbageseeker]

Go Fusion!!

[Mia T]

It's his validation (in his own mind, anyway...)

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t


by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE

 

Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect: Carter received his 1978 Peace Prize in 2002.

Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort).

Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.

Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?

A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA
Mia T, 11.17.05

[Mia T]

;)

[Mia T]

ping

[garbageseeker]

Thanks(Im Blushing)

[Mia T]

you're welcome :)

[Mia T]

ping

[garbageseeker]

Nuclear weapons proliferation is a dangerous thing. This is my area of study. You are getting very unstable nations the control of the atom.

[Westlander]

Sorry. I'm a Mopar fan.
Kasey Kahne did well the other day.

[XBob]

a lot of good stuff which needs to be brought up again. And the nuclear and coal treasons by the xlintons are particularly appropriat today.

[XBob]

16 - "You are getting very unstable nations the control of the atom."

If we arent careful we will soon have Democrats fumbling control of the atom again.

[garbageseeker]

bump