Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices, 5-4, Limit Whistleblower Suits (Alito Breaks Tie, Sides With Conservatives)
New York Times ^ | May 30, 2006

Posted on 05/30/2006 8:18:39 AM PDT by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

1 posted on 05/30/2006 8:18:43 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Bump!


2 posted on 05/30/2006 8:20:39 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

That should include retired Generals...........


3 posted on 05/30/2006 8:21:25 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

This might also have covered the FBI agents who had been trying to get the agency to look into some of the precursors to 9/11. Are you sure stifling whistleblowers is the way you want government to govern? Not me.


4 posted on 05/30/2006 8:26:46 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Stand by for the "chilling effect" predictions.


5 posted on 05/30/2006 8:28:02 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I completely understand the mentality behind this: CYA for the gubmint, but am I off by saying this is a violation of 1st Amendment freedoms? Shouldn't this be covered in gov't employment policy instead of federal code?

/donsFlameproofSuit


6 posted on 05/30/2006 8:28:28 AM PDT by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I don't know, but I'm presuming (and asking):

Roberts
Scalia
Thomas
Alito
???


7 posted on 05/30/2006 8:29:10 AM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

And it says Kennedy wrote the opinion for the majority.


8 posted on 05/30/2006 8:30:03 AM PDT by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the court's majority, said the First Amendment does not protect "every statement a public employee makes in the course of doing his or her job."
9 posted on 05/30/2006 8:30:16 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

No need to predict anything. How did we find out about the Clintons going through FBI records looking for dirt? That's right. Whistleblower. The First Felons would have loved this decision.


10 posted on 05/30/2006 8:30:17 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Kennedy wrote for the Majority, presumably:

Roberts
Kennedy
Scalia
Thomas
Alito


11 posted on 05/30/2006 8:31:03 AM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Toooooo bad the leaking elected Congress creatures are not required to "whistleblow" by the same rules.


12 posted on 05/30/2006 8:32:13 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; rhombus

Thanks. It was right in front of me.


Maxwell House don't fail me now!


13 posted on 05/30/2006 8:32:30 AM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS,
C. J., and SCALIA, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion. SOUTER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS and GINSBURG, JJ., joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion.


14 posted on 05/30/2006 8:34:41 AM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

No prob. I was surprised at the Kennedy vote.


15 posted on 05/30/2006 8:34:55 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Notice how the slimes gets O'Connor's name in the article.... Still crying a river.
16 posted on 05/30/2006 8:35:49 AM PDT by b4its2late (Men are from earth. Women are from earth. Hillary's from hell. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

Did the whistelbowers you cited in the FBI records case sue the "First Felons"?


17 posted on 05/30/2006 8:36:05 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Roberts and Alito must have done a good job persuading Kennedy. Hopefully that will happen more often.

Glad to see limits on those "whistleblowers" divulging our national security secrets and undermining the war on terror.

BTTT!


18 posted on 05/30/2006 8:37:33 AM PDT by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Held: When public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, they are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline. Pp. 5–14.

Opinion available here (pdf)

19 posted on 05/30/2006 8:37:40 AM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Ah, it's in the suing. You're right. This is a tangent from the real problem of opaque governing.


20 posted on 05/30/2006 8:39:40 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson