Skip to comments.
The Last Empire - how it survived so long
Hoover Digest ^
| 2000
| Richard Pipes
Posted on 05/29/2006 8:15:23 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
2
posted on
05/29/2006 8:24:51 AM PDT
by
FerdieMurphy
(For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
To: Tailgunner Joe
I recommend
Vixi, Pipes' autobiography.
3
posted on
05/29/2006 8:29:08 AM PDT
by
Fiji Hill
To: Tailgunner Joe
4
posted on
05/29/2006 8:31:22 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Solzhenitsyn:"Live Not By Lies" www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/ arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html)
To: Tailgunner Joe
But Gorbachev turned out to be a weak, vacillating politician, unable to decide between progress and stability. In the end, against his own wishes, he eviscerated the system that still had some life left in it.DOn't you love how the left instantly went into high spin when the Soviet Union came apart, denying Reagan had ANYthing to do with it, and pointing to Gorbachev's complete failure to reinvigorate the USSR and saying "He MEANT to do that!" And Gorby of course went along with it--"Yeah, yeah, this was my plan all along!" I don't recall if he ever said this explicitly, but he certainly didn't stop people from praising him for his "master plan"--didn't he win the Nobel Preace Prize? What a joke.
To: Tailgunner Joe
They are trying for a comeback -- and they will be back in black.
6
posted on
05/29/2006 8:33:07 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: Tailgunner Joe
"delay ...brought discredit on the government."
From Pipes one would expect better. That government never enjoyed much credit to begin with. For a while, there was a sort of "social expansion" - industrialization, expansion of education etc. - and this created millions of opportunities for personal advancement, and a modicum of optimism [tempered by the purges, when the herd of those who had advanced too far had to be thinned]. Once that "expansion phase" petered out, whatever "credit" the government could have had, petered with it.
7
posted on
05/29/2006 8:39:44 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Tailgunner Joe
Actually, I have wondered for a long time what will eventually cause the end of the American empire. One of these days, hundreds of years from now, archaeologists will dig up ruins and will piece together what caused our decline. I wonder what conclusions they'll come to? :o)
8
posted on
05/29/2006 9:00:05 AM PDT
by
ChocChipCookie
(Democrats: soulless minions of orthodoxy.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Bump. Interesting article.
9
posted on
05/29/2006 9:04:56 AM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(Greystone, I'll miss you (5-12-2001 - 4-15-2006) RIP little buddy.)
To: ChocChipCookie
Actually, I have wondered for a long time what will eventually cause the end of the American empire. One of these days, hundreds of years from now, archaeologists will dig up ruins and will piece together what caused our decline. I wonder what conclusions they'll come to? :o)liberals
10
posted on
05/29/2006 9:10:20 AM PDT
by
mjp
To: mjp
Liberals & sissy a$$ed, whimppy new age girlie men, or am I being redundant again?
11
posted on
05/29/2006 9:18:54 AM PDT
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: Tailgunner Joe
12
posted on
05/29/2006 9:21:49 AM PDT
by
rjp2005
To: Tailgunner Joe
If it is not stopped by us conservatives, the trojan horse known as "illegal immigration" will allow terrorists to carry WMD's across our southern border to write the final chapter on our great nation. God bless America and 230 years of prosperity and freedom.
Semper Fi'
Jarhead
13
posted on
05/29/2006 9:26:06 AM PDT
by
Buffettfan
(VIVA LA MIGRA! - LONG LIVE THE MINUTEMEN!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Before proceeding to discuss the various explanations of the Soviet collapse, a few words need to be said about the problem of historical "causes." Probably no issue is harder for the historian to deal with because causes are disparate: they may be incidental, they may be substantive, or they may be long term; in any case, in each humans play a progressively diminishing role. Interesting article.
However I don't agree with the last asscertion: "humans play a progressively diminishing role."
Communism and socialism are stupid ideas. Anyone with two brain cells can figure that out. "Humans" that advance these ideas are either stupid or evil or both.
Stupid and evil people deserve stupid and evil governments. QED
To: Darkwolf377; Romanov; x5452; BenLurkin; Tailgunner Joe
DOn't you love how the left instantly went into high spin when the Soviet Union came apart, denying Reagan had ANYthing to do with it, and pointing to Gorbachev's complete failure to reinvigorate the USSR and saying "He MEANT to do that!"
How very, very true. Ronald Reagan stated, "The march of freedom and democracy will leave Marxism and Leninism on the ash heap of history." The PPC (Phony Patriot Club)joins with the Left in denying Ronald Reagan was right and won the Cold War, with their "The fall of the Soviet Union was a KGB ruse." Only an imbecile can fail to see Reagan was correct on all counts in challenging the underlying philosophy and predicting the downfall of the Soviet Union. He clearly recognized the moral evil and weaknesses of the system and her masters knew it. PPC members exhibit the same spiritual poverty and weaknesses in having faith in the strength of the Soviets, and at the same time lacking faith in the strengths of America and her virtues.
15
posted on
05/29/2006 10:27:01 AM PDT
by
GarySpFc
(Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Without quarreling with the main thrust of this excellent article, I would make a small quibble about the introduction. It has become accepted (starting maybe with Gibbon) that Rome did not fall but slowly declined (a whimper not a bang.) But recent scholarship indicates that there was in fact a precipitate fall with a radical drop in the standard of living - from a high civilization to subsistence living. High civilizations, including our own, are fragile and cannot withstand the loss of the strenghts that made them high.
To: GarySpFc
But Putinistas insist that it was Russians that overthrew the non-Russian controlled Soviet Union and that Gorbachev dimantled the Soviet Union because he was the first Russian to be its leader.
To: GarySpFc
The Third Rome is rising from the ashes, and the evil athiest socialist EU will be its enemy.
18
posted on
05/29/2006 11:39:07 AM PDT
by
x5452
To: AmeriBrit
19
posted on
05/29/2006 12:08:21 PM PDT
by
investigateworld
(Abortion stops a beating heart)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Good article. Of course it's Pipes, so I expect nothing less.
"In their pursuit of utopia, the Communists violated everything we know from anthropology that human beings, even in the most primitive circumstances, desire and practice. They virtually outlawed religion, property, and free speech, which are common to all societies, regardless of their level of civilization. Any regime that deliberately sets out to repress these institutions is inherently unstable and therefore prone to be fatally affected by adverse developments, whether of an incidental or substantive nature, developments that normal societies readily absorb."
One correction I would make is that while they "outlawed religion" they attempted to replace it with their own brand of religion - the worship of Lenin as a good like figure, and then Stalin.
20
posted on
05/29/2006 12:20:15 PM PDT
by
Romanov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson