Posted on 05/27/2006 7:08:19 PM PDT by Panerai
"They" is not the same as "they."
If you're leaving bread crumbs to your crime everywhere, then you deserve to get nabbed.
But if the defene lawyer could prove reasonable doubt that the only way govt could have found this was through invasive snooping, then no jury of 12 would convict you, guilty as you may be.
The possession and distribution of child pornography is illegal (even if it's "slightly obscured" but still clearly kiddie porn). The narrowly carved exception to the laws that allows police to possess and display illegal materials for purposes of criminal prosecution is not applicable to this case.
If this description is correct, Alberto Gonzales is as guilty as the sleazebag operator of a kiddie-porn peep show.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.