Posted on 05/27/2006 8:00:47 AM PDT by Utah Girl
The following letter has been sent by the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to church leaders in the United States:
We are informed that the United States Senate will on June 6, 2006, vote on an amendment to the federal Constitution designed to protect the traditional institution of marriage.
We, as the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, have repeatedly set forth our position that the marriage of a man and a woman is the only acceptable marriage relationship.
In 1995 we issued a Proclamation to the World on this matter, and have repeatedly reaffirmed that position.
In that proclamation we said: "We call upon responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere to promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society."
We urge our members to express themselves on this urgent matter to their elected representatives in the Senate.
I saw LDS and thought LSD. I need COFFEE now.
constitutional amendment that would limit lawful marriages to those between a man and a woman. woman=WOMEN
Every state should have the right to decide for themselves. Article IV of the Constitution combined with the DOMA ensures that my state does not have to recognize non-traditional marriages from other states.
The way every state should have the right to set abortion laws for themselves? Like that?
?
Precisely. Which is why I want Roe repealed.
Oh, oh!! The Mormons wouldn't like that!
Works for me.
"the church is trying to tie G-d's hands on the matter. It doesn't matter what He wants. Sad, really..."
Not so. For the LDS faithful, God has made a proclamation on polygamy. Thus the church no longer condones or endorses polygamy in any form. Those that do are ex-communicated and are not allowed fellowship with the church any longer.
As for them trying to secretly bring it back, what nonsence.
>>I doubt that is their intention. If anything, it is the opposite.
>>The LAST thing the church wants, is for polygamy to become legal.
>>That is a can of worms they don't want to open, no matter what.
Yeah, we fought all the way to the Supreme Court for it, so we don’t want it legalized now. Your leaps in logic astound me. (Why am I hearing echoes of “Everything that’s up should be down, and everything that’s down…”)
>>In essence, for LDS faithful, the church is trying to tie G-d's hands on the matter.
>>It doesn't matter what He wants. Sad, really...
So, in your mind, God wants same sex marriage? I thought he was very vocal in the Old, and New Testaments about that. Sound’s like he’s being consistent and that the LDS are just in step with him. (On this one issue at least, you should agree)
BTW, I am a Mormon (LDS), if that matters to you.
Backing an amendment defining marriage, is in effect tying G-d's hands should He decide it is time to restore the practice of Celestial plural marriage.
Talk about hubris and a total disregard for agency....
What part of honoring and obeying the laws of the land is stumping you? It’s part of our beliefs as outlined by Joseph Smith.
The proclamation by the church was stating that we would abide by the Law, not declaring it just. (http://scriptures.lds.org/od/1 )
“Inasmuch as laws have been enacted by Congress forbidding plural marriages, which laws have been pronounced constitutional by the court of last resort, I hereby declare my intention to submit to those laws, and to use my influence with the members of the Church over which I preside to have them do likewise.”
And no this does not mean we are trying to “Bring it back”.
Do some homework before you post slander about a religion /Rant
"So, in your mind, God wants same sex marriage?"
No, but He wants AGENCY. Whatever happened to "teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves"?
Also see post #16....
>>And which select individual did God make this 'proclamation' to?
Can you prove he didn’t? (Crickets…) I thought so.
>>I'm sure God didn't say beans on the matter; the head cult leaders just didn't
>>want the feds busting up their organization .
And you have knowledge of this how?
>>didn't Joseph Smith 'marry' some pre-teens like mohammed?
No, not “just like Mohammad”, what a slanderous, smarmy tactic. Were you unable to find a way to bring in Hitler and Pol Pot in your character assassination by association?
Did you learn to do that at DU, or does it come naturally?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.