Skip to comments.
“Rhythm Method” May Kill Off More Embryos than Other Methods of Contraception
NewsWise ^
| 24 May, 2006
| British Medical Journal
Posted on 05/25/2006 9:24:35 AM PDT by gcruse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
1
posted on
05/25/2006 9:24:37 AM PDT
by
gcruse
To: gcruse
2
posted on
05/25/2006 9:27:03 AM PDT
by
highball
(Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
To: gcruse
if all oral contraceptive users converted to the rhythm method, then they would be effectively causing the deaths of millions of embryos. Oh, please - why are they reaching for this?
3
posted on
05/25/2006 9:27:41 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: gcruse
4
posted on
05/25/2006 9:27:59 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: gcruse
I'm starting to get the idea these days that people are on an attack the Catholic Church kick. Maybe it's just me, I dunno.
5
posted on
05/25/2006 9:28:22 AM PDT
by
Catholic Canadian
(Formerly Ashamed Canadian - thank you Stephen Harper!)
To: gcruse
Is it not just as callous to organise your sex life to make it harder for a fertilised egg to survive, using this method, as it is to use the coil or the morning after pill, he asks? Hmmmmm....me thinks the researcher has an agenda, what say you?
6
posted on
05/25/2006 9:29:26 AM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: gcruse
The third assumption is that there is a greater chance that a conception will lead to a viable embryo if it occurs in the centre interval of the fertile period than if it occurs on the tail ends of the fertile period. This assumption is not backed up by empirical evidence, but does have a certain plausibility.
Catholics use Natural Family Planning, not the rhythm method.
To: Izzy Dunne
Because he has nothing else?
susie
8
posted on
05/25/2006 9:29:37 AM PDT
by
brytlea
(amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
To: gcruse
If they "may" be less viable, that is the natural order. No human intervention is altering the life cycle as it was designed to function.
9
posted on
05/25/2006 9:30:23 AM PDT
by
Sisku Hanne
(Send "Cut-n-Run" Murtha packing. Support Diana Irey for Congress!)
To: gcruse
Some folks have no rhythm. Or, so I've been told.
10
posted on
05/25/2006 9:30:24 AM PDT
by
auboy
To: gcruse
My rhythm method didn't work too well - kid #3.
Journal of Medical Ethics - wonder what their ethics are on late term abortions?
11
posted on
05/25/2006 9:30:24 AM PDT
by
jstassis
To: gcruse
12
posted on
05/25/2006 9:30:56 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: gcruse
What a stupid theory.
13
posted on
05/25/2006 9:31:10 AM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(Victory at all costs-in spite of all terror-however long and hard the road may be-for survival)
To: gcruse
You cant kill what isn't alive or in this case, FERTILIZED!
To: Gingersnap
Catholics use Natural Family Planning, not the rhythm method.
No kidding, the least he could do is do the five minutes of research required to find that out.
To: gcruse
I understand the premise and it makes sense, but women are always going to lose embryos due to such causes.
You can only do as well as you can do. Embryos will be lost all the time, as well as miscarriages of a further along fetus.
This may help Catholics abstain longer to virtually eliminate the chance of killing a fetus. Why take a chance when you are playing with a life?
However, I do believe birth control is acceptable as a non-Catholic.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: gcruse
It won't be truthful until Dan Brown weighs in on it ...
There, I stepped in it also ;-)
The other side of this absurd argument says "don't have sex during a period in the menstrual cycle where a fertilized egg/embryo might not implant in the uterine wall. Any sex that doesn't result in a viable embryo is bad."
THis guy never passed Critical Thinking as a freshman I bet.
Anyway ... off to the races on this one.
18
posted on
05/25/2006 9:32:59 AM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: trisham
Bovens is unsurprisingly not too unlike BovineS.
19
posted on
05/25/2006 9:33:24 AM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(Victory at all costs-in spite of all terror-however long and hard the road may be-for survival)
To: jstassis
Then you know what they call couples who use the rhythm method...
Parents
20
posted on
05/25/2006 9:33:34 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(There are only a few absolute truths in life, the rest are just opinion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson