Posted on 05/21/2006 1:33:27 PM PDT by FairOpinion
I love these sunday afternoon FR joust-a-bouts..
especially when there is no
Nascar and it's raining..
:-)
Conservatism wins every time it's tried.
When ya have to go to Islam Online to post something.. lol
Well, unless you and the islamofascists both think that conservatives are idiots, it's a lost cause for them.
Whether a better candidate appears or not, the options of not voting republican is not on my intergalactic radar.
If a better Republican appears, so much the better. If I have a choice of an incubent or a potentially better one, the new guy gets my money and my vote.
Voting third party or "progressive" (aka Democrat) is not even a remote remote option. Neither is Third Party.
Actually some fine "conservative" here in the US published a lengthy article in the Washintgon Post, about how conservatives shouldn't support Republicans, resulting in Dems get elected, and the Islamofacists would love to see Dems in power -- hence this article, because they know that the Dems would give up the War on Terror and would do, and would accomplish exactly what the terrorists want: destroy the US economy, but the Dems would do it, in the name of global warming. The terrorists would just have to get popcorn and watch us destroy ourselves, THAT is what the Dems would give us. So the Islamofacists are cheering our fine "conservatives" who want to turn the country over to the Dems.
NO SANE conservative could possibly be in favor of this.
"Patriarch of US conservatives"?? Are they talking about this "Richard Viguerie"??
I never heard of him.
Help me out here. If you never heard of him, how do you know he is an "islamo Fascist"?
That's a mighty hefty accusation with nothing to back it up, wouldn't you say?
We know you would never jump to conclusions, would you?
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=18669
"Christians feel there is a war against Christians out there," Viguerie told Jacoby. "We would like to make sure that the president, and he's inclined to do this, understands how there's an anti-Christian environment in the culture, at the national level, in Hollywood, television, the media generally, a lot of the institutions -- legal institutions, educational institutions. We want to change that. People of traditional values have a role to play in the public arena."
" the options of not voting republican is not on my intergalactic radar."
===
You are correct and sensible, but just read some of the posts, who say they would rather see the Dems win, because "that would teach Republicans".
I don't understand how one can justify donating money to the NRSC, et al, so they can run ads defending the liberal incumbent in a Republican primary.
Trouble is it's sometimes tough to find good conservative orgs who can get things done. Club for Growth is probably the best out there but they screw stuff up sometimes, too.
Sorry, but saying posters should learn something about the Conservative movement before posting isn't a flame. It's common sense.
Like I said, you can agree or disagree with Mr.Viguerie but his Conservative credentials are unassailable. I happen to disagree with Mr. Viguerie’s analysis but to dismiss his opinion out of hand just displays ignorance.
Oh yeah, I work in Conservative politics full time and have for years. I am one of the people who make government work to the limited extent one could say government works
But, I remember how good Viguerie was at raising money.
Pull up a stool Grasshopper.. we will enlighten you, well, entertain at least, hopefully. ;-]
Seems to me Soros is getting his money's worth out of his contributions to both sides of the aisle.
How can he be a patriarch if I've never heard of him? Sounds more like a has-been, otherwise, what's he doing writing for the Post? Maybe he's like a Soros, except less visible and with more money? Clueless here.
"He does have a point about the betrayal of the RINOs, but I don't necessarily like his solution"
He is advocating the creation of a new, Conservative fundraising entity, with no ties to any political party, catering to grassroots Conservatives ... small, individual donors, basically, from whom he has gained the sense, via feedback from polling and direct mail, that there is a strong feeling of betrayal by the Republican Party, in favor of big business interests. He's essentially saying that these business interests can fund the party, and this new Conservative entity would fund Conservatives. It actually sounds like a plausible idea to me, at first blush. And, it would in no way threaten Conservative candidates, the vast majority of which are Republican.
In 2008, after two years of a Democrat Congress, how desperate will you be to get rid of the Dems? Desperate enough to support a moderate against a Democrat?
25 years ago? Where's he been lately?
BTW, of course you remember that Time named Hitler Man of the Year, right?
And they are getting to you?
I suspect that, although there are a few Republicans who can wear the "idiot" label proudly, most of these are trolls funning with you and messing with your head.
And you're letting them...
"Clueless here."
===
YOU are NOT the clueless one.
Richard Viguerie writing for the W Post is the clueless one, a "useful idiot", if he didn't realize that his diatribe against Republicans will serve to help the Dems and the terrorists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.