Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United States Backs UN NGO Status for Homosexual Activist Groups Once Associated with Pedophiles
Life Site News ^ | May 19, 2006 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 05/19/2006 2:02:45 PM PDT by topher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
The Bush Administration needs to wake up!
1 posted on 05/19/2006 2:02:45 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher
From the article:

The Vatican representative, who has only observer status in the committee, took issue with the notion that the demands of homosexual activist organizations had anything to do with human rights.

During the Clinton Administration, there was an attempt to oust the Vatican totally from the UN (Hillary and crowd).

Something Catholic voters should remember about the Clintons and their anti-Catholic non-sense.

2 posted on 05/19/2006 2:05:47 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
All together now, loud and clear: "THE BUSH ADMINSITRATION IS NOT CONSERVATIVE-- THE GOP LIED".

Thank-you.

3 posted on 05/19/2006 2:07:22 PM PDT by mikeus_maximus (Hey George! Read OUR lips: Build the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Did Bolton take the day off or something?


4 posted on 05/19/2006 2:08:06 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus

SHOW ME THE PROOF.


5 posted on 05/19/2006 2:14:22 PM PDT by ishabibble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

My thoughts exactly. With Bolton there, I don't expect this stuff to happen...


6 posted on 05/19/2006 2:14:41 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

MEANT FOR MIKEUS-MAXIMUS.


7 posted on 05/19/2006 2:15:58 PM PDT by ishabibble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: topher
I would favor the complete and immediate "decertification" of every single one of the so-called U.N. NGOs.
8 posted on 05/19/2006 2:19:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Mr. Bolton, please get on this case.


9 posted on 05/19/2006 2:20:21 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
They will not wake up, I fear.

This is just what I have been saying for some time, even since the Michael Jackson disaster started. Adult child sexual relations are the next target for normalization and it is to be pitied but many calling themselves conservative today will be okay with it in a decade or less. Most will call me names for suggesting it and still in 10 years or less will say it is "part of who they are" and calls for polite acceptance. They will back a GOP pol who talks about their pedophile son in 10 years yet today take umbrage at my words predicting this very thing.

Want proof? Just look at the next thread on a female school teacher having sex with a male student. (The more attractive the teacher the more proof will be in evidence)

20 years ago it would have been a firing offense for a College Professor to be found dating a student even if the student was older than the Professor. It was called an unseemly abuse of ones professional relationship back then and we are talking both people being full adults. Now it is not unusual to see sympathy for an adult (or a reasonable facsimile of one) and a 13 year old junior high student, and many only see the "Love". Love my butt, this stuff has gone too far.
10 posted on 05/19/2006 2:21:27 PM PDT by iluvlucy (swim the Tiber, the water is fine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble; mikeus_maximus

SHOW ME PROOF THAT HE IS.


11 posted on 05/19/2006 2:22:19 PM PDT by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: topher

In 25 years here's where we'll be...

* The US gov't will only be a figurehead state. All actual gov't decisions will be made by the UN.

* The USA will be nothing more than a 'satellite economic zone' of the EU.

* Our borders will be patrolled by Mexico in a bid to save money by outsourcing.

* The military will consist of 3 guys in blue helmets, all gay.

* Our police will not carry guns, but will have direct numbers to grief counselors.

God help us all.


12 posted on 05/19/2006 2:25:23 PM PDT by navyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

"SHOW ME THE PROOF."

Which year's budget would you like to see?
The Borders?
The Vice Pres. and his daughter?
Rx drug benefits?
The Kennedy Educations bill/aka no child left behind?
The pork?
Where is the challenge to the courts on abortion?
The support of Arlin Specter?

Want more???? had enough????


13 posted on 05/19/2006 2:26:17 PM PDT by iluvlucy (swim the Tiber, the water is fine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; scripter; little jeremiah; DBeers

sick and depraved ping to both lists


14 posted on 05/19/2006 2:34:17 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus
Bush is conservative on some things, and liberal on others.

This however is not one of the topics in which he's shown himself to be liberal in the past.

The State department doesn't get cleaned out with each administration, and as we've seen there are a lot of very liberal people at State as well as at the CIA that are working toward their own agendas.

We do need to get an answer from the administration as to if this reflects the administration's policy and if not, what is being done to make sure this doesn't happen again.

It's also Bush's responsibility to get control of those working in his administration even if he simply inherited them from a previous administration. He's done an absolutely horrible job at doing that, and it's caused some serious problems.

While this doesn't seem consistent with Bush's personal views and actions, it's his administration and he's responsible for it's actions. He's been in office for over six years now.

THE BUSH ADMINSITRATION IS NOT CONSERVATIVE-- THE GOP LIED

Actually Bush has pretty much done what he said he would do during his election campaigns. He talked about a lot of big spending. His idea of fiscal conservatism is stimulating the economy through tax cuts so the government has move money to spend by taking a slightly smaller percentage of the earnings of a larger economy.

He didn't lie about such things. I think that a lot of us just didn't listen carefully enough to what he said or thought he was trying to present himself favorably to swing voters.

15 posted on 05/19/2006 2:57:33 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
He didn't lie about such things. I think that a lot of us just didn't listen carefully enough to what he said or thought he was trying to present himself favorably to swing votersTrue, true. But the GOP leaders labelled him a conservative. Those of us who were listening hoped he wouldn't be as liberal as he sounded, because he was the lesser of two evils.

I've played that GOP game for almost 2 decades now. No more.

16 posted on 05/19/2006 3:03:06 PM PDT by mikeus_maximus (Hey George! Read OUR lips: Build the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: topher

bump


17 posted on 05/19/2006 3:05:46 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus
But the GOP leaders labeled him a conservative.

Some did, but of those "leaders" how many of THEM would you consider conservative?

Others concentrated on the issues on which he is relatively conservative.

Others simply described him as more electable than his competition in the primary.

Don't forget that his main competitor in the primary was McCain.

Those of us who were listening hoped he wouldn't be as liberal as he sounded, because he was the lesser of two evils.

Exactly.

Among the major candidates for either main party, I have a hard time believing that any of the others were really a better choice.

I'm disgusted with Bush's utter refusal to enforce our immigration laws, and his efforts to support amnesty for illegal immigrants.

I'm disgusted with him not vetoing port laden bills.

I'm unhappy with his approach to a lot of things.

What other even slight viable candidates were there that would have been a better choice overall?

I've played that GOP game for almost 2 decades now. No more.

If you've got a plan that you think will help keep us from having to make the same kind of choices in 2008 I'm interested in hearing what you've got to say, because I don't like the direction our country is headed, and I agree that the GOP doesn't seem to be making genuine efforts to take us off of the path of bigger and bigger government and economic stagnation.

18 posted on 05/19/2006 3:51:46 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Sick feeling deep in pit of stomach.

Get the (freaking) UN out of the US, and the US out of the (freaking) UN.

It is beyond disgusting that the UN is on our soil and that our government participates in its activities.

Personally, I'm coming to the conclusion that so much is FUBAR that only divine intervention of some sort will change the direction.


19 posted on 05/19/2006 3:53:00 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I'm starting to think that way too. There's no rational explanation for this.
20 posted on 05/19/2006 4:09:38 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson