Skip to comments.
Ready, set, mutate... and may the best microbe win
Rice University ^
| 18 May 2006
| Staff (press release)
Posted on 05/18/2006 11:16:00 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-227 next last
Everybody be nice.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
2
posted on
05/18/2006 11:17:29 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
Look at that. Evolution in a flask!
And they recorded the chain of mutations.
Great experiment.
3
posted on
05/18/2006 11:23:12 AM PDT
by
mc6809e
To: PatrickHenry
"The duplicate study suggests that the pathways of molecular adaptation are reproducible and not highly variable under identical conditions," Shamoo said. Interesting.
4
posted on
05/18/2006 11:23:21 AM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: PatrickHenry
Lots of stuff to chew on.
For those critters that reproduce sexually, the ratio of unsuccessful to successful sperm cells is hundreds of millions to one. Lots of room for unhelpful mutations to get weeded out.
5
posted on
05/18/2006 11:25:15 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: PatrickHenry
In before Hitler!
Seriously, interesting article, thanks for the ping. Of course, the deniers will still discount it as "micro-evolution", or something.
Unfortunate name for the scientist, too! I anticipate lots of killer whale jokes.
8
posted on
05/18/2006 11:30:26 AM PDT
by
2nsdammit
(By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
The way I read that, it takes an incredibly specialized, highly-tailored "evolution" to take the "right" path. Interesting. You read that wrong. There was no tailoring done. There were simply millions of random mutations, only a few of which were beneficial.
No intelligence had to alter those genes. No tailoring was done. They mutated on their own and the environment (temperature) weeded out the unfit.
9
posted on
05/18/2006 11:33:49 AM PDT
by
mc6809e
To: DaveLoneRanger
You mean like the "hands-off" experiment we are doing daily, building all those anti-biotic resistant microbes in nature (our bodies)?
Of course they are setting up the experiment on purpose - that's how science works. They come up with a prediction, based on the prevailing science, set up an experiment which they predict will give a particular outcome, then watch it run.
10
posted on
05/18/2006 11:35:20 AM PDT
by
2nsdammit
(By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
To: 2nsdammit
11
posted on
05/18/2006 11:37:34 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
They grew the bacteria for one month in fermentor, raising the temperature a half degree Celsius each day.I wonder if they ever cackled evilly as I did when lysing my transfected bacteria before bleaching them and dumping them down the sink.
12
posted on
05/18/2006 11:45:18 AM PDT
by
ahayes
(Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
To: mc6809e
Look at that. Evolution in a flask! And they recorded the chain of mutations. Great experiment. But it's still a microbe! Get back to me when you can recreate the entire planetary biosphere in your satanic lab. And don't forget to get your own dirt!
</creationism mode>
13
posted on
05/18/2006 11:47:44 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: 2nsdammit
Of course they are setting up the experiment on purpose - that's how science works. They come up with a prediction, based on the prevailing science, set up an experiment which they predict will give a particular outcome, then watch it run. They purposely mutate a microbe to exist in designer environment. Call me when they observe, or even intelligently cause, speciation into a higher lifeform.
14
posted on
05/18/2006 11:47:49 AM PDT
by
mikeus_maximus
(Hey George! Read OUR lips: Build the wall!)
To: DaveLoneRanger
By the way, these guys are forcing this; setting up the experiment with purpose, intent, will, intelligence, etc. in manmade containers with manmade, controlled environments, and human-designed instruments. This is an experiment, which means human interaction and influence. A study would just be a hands-off observance. Will they then turn around and tell us "ha, TOLD YOU it doesn't take intelligence"? What does this say about their opinion of themselves?
What intelligent act actually caused the thousands of mutations to occur? And what intelligent act caused some of these mutations to be selected as more beneficial than the others regarding the changing environment?
15
posted on
05/18/2006 11:49:02 AM PDT
by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: PatrickHenry
LOL!!!!
I love it! You got this in 5 seconds before the (non-sarcastic) example!!
16
posted on
05/18/2006 11:49:46 AM PDT
by
2nsdammit
(By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
To: 2nsdammit
Which is satire, and which is sincere? That's your homework assignment.
17
posted on
05/18/2006 11:51:47 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: mikeus_maximus
They purposely mutate a microbe to exist in designer environment. Call me when they observe, or even intelligently cause, speciation into a higher lifeform. Where did you get the idea that they ever caused any mutation at all, purposely or not? And what exactly is a higher life form? One that can survive in an environment that a preceding life form could not, perhaps?
18
posted on
05/18/2006 11:52:18 AM PDT
by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: PatrickHenry; furball4paws
This sounds like a really cool experiment. Is this sort of thing up that's right up "furball4paws" alley?
If so, perhaps he can point out the significance of the findings.
19
posted on
05/18/2006 11:52:48 AM PDT
by
longshadow
(FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
To: mikeus_maximus
They didn't "purposely mutate" - they purposely selected for a mutation, which occurred on its own.
20
posted on
05/18/2006 11:53:15 AM PDT
by
2nsdammit
(By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-227 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson