Posted on 05/18/2006 12:35:37 AM PDT by one more state
No need to get your panties in a wad, just smoke some more "American", apparently it's your favorite./sarc
As to my point, there are several studies out there, but please use some common sense. Like any other agricultural "product" marijuana has been modified and selectively bred over a period of decades for increased profit and potency.
http://collections.ic.gc.ca/drug/articles/marijuana/m_hi_tpr.htm
I believe the Monroe Doctrine is the one we interpret as us not allowing the Euroweenies to muck around in our hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine is sympatico with Manifest Destiny.
Nuke Mexico City that is the only answer. Or should it be MOABed?
Are you from Canada? Since the link is I thought you might be as well.
Tsk, tsk, is that the best you can up with? I'm very disappointed.
You chose a site with the most outrageous numbers you could find, didn't you.
Well, your link is a site for children...what do they know. Is that why you chose it? Do children come here?
Really, though marijuana with 52 percent THC? You don't find that just a little preposterous?
And don't you think that something written be a Victoria cop would be just a little bit biased?
So is ours.
I'm worried about the U.S. being on the edge of chaos.
The political turmoil was actually helped by our open borders. Fox's party did not need to satisfy the base, simply export them and keep status quo. Now it's coming back to bite him. If the wrong party gets into power in Mexico it will be a bad mark on the open-border Mcain people
Third, the use of average potency can be also be potentially misleading, since the average ignores differences between cannabis users in preferences for cannabis products of varying potency. There probably has always been a market for more potent products among the heavier, and hence, more THC-tolerant, cannabis users. Marijuana probably remains the majority preference of cannabis users, although this is an issue worthy of investigation.
Fourth, it is not obvious that more potent forms of cannabis inevitably have more adverse effects on users' health than less potent forms. Indeed, it is conceivable that increased potency may have little or no adverse effect if users are able to titrate their dose to achieve the desired state of intoxication, as some have argued they do (e.g. Kleiman, 1992; Mikuyira and Aldrich, 1988). If users were able to titrate their dose, the use of more potent cannabis products would reduce the amount of cannabis material that was smoked, which would marginally reduce the risks of developing respiratory diseases.
Snip...All considered then, it is far from established that the average THC potency of cannabis products has substantially increased over recent decades. If potency has increased, it is even less certain that the average health risks of cannabis use have materially changed as a consequence, since users may titrate their dose to achieve the desired effects.
Pretty interesting stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.