Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC Claims Government Traced Its Reporters' Calls
New York Sun ^ | May 16,2006 | JOSH GERSTEIN

Posted on 05/16/2006 6:48:33 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: RexBeach
ABC should name the "unnamed senior federal official." Otherwise this story is just a lot of smoke and mirrors from a couple of major whiners.

I agree that their should name the "unnamed senior federal official", but do you really expect them to?

21 posted on 05/16/2006 7:00:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
We're finally dealing with the enemy within!!

W said "...a war on many fronts..." I sure hope that Mr.Tony Snow can help open up this front successfully!
22 posted on 05/16/2006 7:00:41 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

MILLER to BIN LADEN: "We can't keep meeting like this...someone is going to suspect something..."

23 posted on 05/16/2006 7:00:44 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yeah, the media can be as unscrupulous, traitorous and underhanded as it likes, but the government has to walk some kind of media-defined straight and narrow in dealing with them? I don't think so. I hope they nail them once and for all for providing aid and comfort to the enemy.


24 posted on 05/16/2006 7:00:47 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nope, naming so-called "unnamed sources" would spoil all of their fun.


25 posted on 05/16/2006 7:02:16 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

RATHER to SADDAM: "Are you sure you changed your cell number?"

26 posted on 05/16/2006 7:03:10 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well, the NYT and other news agencies demand that the government release information - memos, emails, phone messages, etc. - that THEY are interested in, so why can't the government investigate things as well? Why does the news media arrogantly assume that it has rights and priviliges that the government itself doesn't have?


27 posted on 05/16/2006 7:04:25 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
ABC Claims Government Traced Its Reporters' Calls

GOOD !!!!!!

28 posted on 05/16/2006 7:06:55 AM PDT by Dustbunny (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good news...I am happy to see someone on the ball


29 posted on 05/16/2006 7:08:28 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

ARAFAT to LIB MEDIA: "Make sure you get my new cell number..."

30 posted on 05/16/2006 7:09:11 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
ABC News claimed yesterday that phone calls made by its reporters and journalists at the New York Times and Washington Post are being traced by the federal government as part of an investigation into leaks of classified information.

So, pulling out all the stops to investigate leak of unclassified, widely known, silly info (Valerie Plame) is okay. Looking into leaks of important, national security threatening leaks, OHMYGOD!!!! You can't do that!

31 posted on 05/16/2006 7:09:59 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

How free republic has changed. Back in the Clinton days everyone would have been filled with righteous anger about this. On the bright side, when Hilary becomes president, everyone here will turn on a dime and suddenly become skeptics of big government again. The problem is that it will be too late and they will have no credibility.


32 posted on 05/16/2006 7:12:12 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'm just positive that ABC was in the forefront in opposition to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act when Clinton signed it. And soon, they will produce reams of columns and articles, and thousands of hours of broadcasts showing how strongly they opposed and resisted it. Take it away ABC, you're in the spotlight now. Show us how heroically you stood up to Clinton in your fight for "privacy" rights.
33 posted on 05/16/2006 7:17:08 AM PDT by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
when Hilary becomes president

Again with the hand-wringing over Hitlery's eventual ascension and the inevitable repercussions.

It all comes down to the government abusing its given powers, and that can happen regardless of who is the POTUS.

What they are doing now is not abuse of their powers as far as I understand it. If Hitlery were doing the same right now I would still be happy that the traitors were being tracked, although I wouldn't be so quick to actually give her credit for the idea. :)
34 posted on 05/16/2006 7:18:31 AM PDT by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression

By making these leaks public, I'm disgusted that the press has managed to completely destroy our ability to trace terrorist calls anymore. No one seems to be harping on that fact, and I'm disappointed that the GOP doesn't have talking points to place this treasonous blame where it belongs, on the drive-by liberal media!


35 posted on 05/16/2006 7:18:42 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Now we see the real reason for the uproar over the call records being given to the NSA.

All of the media is scared they will be found out as they mine the field of leaks, terrorist contacts, etc.

And they need to be found out. They are endangering America with their mindless leak mining.


36 posted on 05/16/2006 7:18:43 AM PDT by ClancyJ (Is the primary goal of our Congress to protect America's borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
"unnamed senior federal official"

This could be PieEyed Pitt, or the truly pathetic Jason of "writes his own book reviews" infamy, or could it be a PJ Comix himself, setting out to prove what he's been saying all along...They are all demented liars, and they control the media?

Whoever it is deserves a medal for rattling the cages of those two pantywaste cases. Maybe ABC can borrow CBS's big black eye!
37 posted on 05/16/2006 7:19:31 AM PDT by ishabibble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny
ABC Claims Government Traced Its Reporters' Calls

GOOD !!!!!!

Glad to hear that, I will sleep better tonight.

38 posted on 05/16/2006 7:21:41 AM PDT by TYVets (God so loved the world he didn't send a committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: carrier-aviator

Why should the media/reporters/news services be free from the laws covering "leaking of classified information"?

If they are free of coverage by these laws, of course, every spy, every terrorist agent will become a news reporter or work for the media so that they can freely contact any they choose, handle information as they choose.

Duh, we all should be under the same laws about handling classified information - or the term "classified" means nothing.


39 posted on 05/16/2006 7:22:04 AM PDT by ClancyJ (Is the primary goal of our Congress to protect America's borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Demkicker, the only hope I hold onto is that this is another case of allowing them to run out enough rope.....

I think it is possible that the Bush administration has taken the position of just letting the MSM run as long as far as they want to and let the American people ( and the people of the world) see for themsevles what is going on.

It is proper to say that not all people will see them for what they are and see what they are doing for what it is but many folks will IMHO.

With the internet, politicians and the media alike are finding out that they cannot run from what they do or say as they have in the past. Maybe we are actually on the brink of some serious change where the media gets back to the goal of reporting truth and keeping secret those stories that harm our nation. You know what I mean? Where the media will actually be FOR this nation instead of against it!


40 posted on 05/16/2006 7:24:21 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson