Posted on 05/15/2006 7:45:36 PM PDT by bobsunshine
I heard the POTUS use that number during his speech
Please ping me when you get those answered?
I can turn that right around on you hon. If you aren't interesting in deporting illegals and ending catch and release, then maybe your other claims are outright BS too. LOL
"slip showing?"
that's rich coming from the likes of you...
anytime you want to enlist in the Marine Corps you let me know. LMAO
BTW, I did when I was 17 30+ years ago
No I am talking about the spam post here claiming that Clinton prosecuted more employers than Bush has. No I think Bush meant exactly what he said. 6 million on 5 years but catch and release made their actual deportation moot. He stated that catch and release will be stopped under his plan.
OK Thanks, So the "Clinton Supporter" on this thread is posting more numbers comimg from the DNC talking points, THANKS, Who'd a thunk it :-)
So I noted that Tancredo thought the president's plan was a good one. You came back with your ever so intelligence, "Um. Not really. Go ahead and say that."
But this is YOUR post:
Posted by Spiff to kellynla
On News/Activism 05/15/2006 8:35:10 PM EDT · 971 of 2,553
Rep. Tom Tancredo and Rep. Pete King follows the President's speech on Fox News Channel.
Rep. King says we should NOT consider letting people who are here illegally stay here. He's the Homeland Secrueity Committee Chairman. Totally against "legalization" and that it is a magnet to pull more people across the border. Rep. Tancredo on now. Praising troops on the border idea. Praising employment ID card. False dichotomy from the President where he says either legalize all of them or round up and deport all 12 million. There's something in between.
You're joking, right? If immigration is a chicken little, "sky is falling" issue, then why did Bush suddenly decide to send 6,000 troops to help secure the border, and make the announcement on a specially prepared national TV audience? Did Chicken Little scare him to death, or did he propose his troops plan to try to appease his base, which is disintegrating faster than you can say "vigilante"?
It's a damn shame that he doesn't view 20 million people sneaking into our country under the radar of the law, and who arrogantly refuse to assimilate, to be INVADERS, because that's exactly what they are. Even Rush Limbaugh has said, (today, in fact), that illegal immigration is fast becoming the dominant issue on the minds of ALL Americans.
I heard Tancredo and King on O'RiledUp after the speech, and though both were respectful of the President, neither agreed with any part of the plan beyond securing the borders.
This wasn't even a close call.
I only heard a few seconds of Dobbs, so I can't comment about his reaction. But what you posted WRT Tancredo isn't true.
"I did when I was 17 30+ years ago"
well then act like one!
You said that they said that the President's plan "was a good one". They didn't. They had problems with the President's plan, big ones. Your characterization of what they said was not accurate.
Ahem. Maybe you didn't read the link. Those aren't MY posts. They are a compilation of other freepers reports about what Tancredo and Dobbs said.
If you saw the post I made, detailing just a few freeper reports, you will see there are differing opinions about that.
Yeah, I read your post on the other thread. I was commenting on your post #2 on this thread, where you wrote:
To: bobsunshine
Thanks for the post.
Before the complainers get here, I just want to note that both Lou Dobbs and Tancredo thought the president's plan and speech was a good one.
2 posted on 05/15/2006 9:46:31 PM CDT by Peach
you're a punk
it's nonstop "Bush is to blame for 50 years of neglect on our borders and if he doesn't solve the problem in this speech tonight, it's time to impeach him.
Your so right.
neither agreed with any part of the plan beyond securing the borders.
Your wrong. The only part they did not like was the guest worker program.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.