[Sic Luceat Lux]

Indicators observed by independent Iran watchers during the past week are raising the question that nuclear-seeking Iran is not merely playing a serious game of brinkmanship, but is actually preparing to strike at Israel...

I say that Israel now has their fingers on the buttons of many Neutron warheads -
-and they won't wait until they get hit first!

An indicator of a pre-emptive attack with their neutron arsenal (by Israel) might show with the sudden rise in the price of oil and gold bullion tomorrow and Tuesday.

[Prime Choice]

"For Mohammad, the letters were a prelude to a Muslim offensive, a war launched for the purpose of imposing Islamic rule over infidels."

Note to Iran: we're thinking globally...

[ez]

"Ahmadinejad believes that he has been chosen – he has a divine mission – to usher in the 12th Imam – the Mahdi.

"He believes that in order for this Mahdi to return … the entire world should be filled with chaos; there should be a battle between good and evil – in his mind between the east and the west."

It was into this situation of universal chaos that the Mahdi would come to establish peace and justice in the earth.

Mahmou - dAhmed - inejad = 6 - 6 - 6.

[philman_36]

Iran's Ahmadinejad Says Nuke Talks Possible, Verbally Attacks Israel
Iran's president told Indonesian Islamic leaders Friday that his country's nuclear program was for civilian purposes...
I would imagine that in his way of thinking that is how it will be used after the Mahdi returns. It will be used for civilian purposes once peace is established. Until then, well, who knows?

...and that he wanted to live in a "peaceful manner."
He wanted to live in a peaceful manner. He doesn't say he will or that he wants to live in a peaceful manner. Using the past tense of the word instead of the present tense...I'm no shrink, but that doesn't sound good to me. (perhaps the translation is lacking)
The problem, apparently, is that there are several millions of people who stand in the way of his version of peace.
JMO

[OKIEDOC]

As a student of history I certainly take this guy as a real threat.

No one but an idiot would dismiss what this mad man has in store for most of the world.

Yet the likes of Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosie and other Chamberlain types are critizing Bush for not negotiating.

I seem to remember Bill Clinton and Madam Albright negotiating with another mad man and you can see where that got us, no where.

This Iranian fiasco is a sound reason why we must not ever let someone of Hillary's ilk into power.

Well a lot can happen in three more years.

I would not doubt that we might even be in a greater war than the one in Iraq.

Could it be that Ahmadinejad is thinking about attacking across the border into Iraq.

Hitting the US Army with an ever decreasing strength in numbers.

I think Ahmadinejad reads our traitorous New York Times and the Washington Compost.