Skip to comments.
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Inaccurate (Border Patrol rebuts Minutemen report)
US Border Patrol Newsroom ^
| 9 May 2006
| USBP
Posted on 05/09/2006 6:39:37 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,380, 1,381-1,400, 1,401-1,420 ... 1,441-1,444 next last
To: Texasforever
"Show me the quote. I haven't seen it yet."
OK, since you don't want to scroll upthread to find it:
"by Miroslava Flores La Voz de Aztlan Tenochtitlan, Mexico D.F. - March 11, 2005 - (ACN) The Secretary of State of the USA Condoleezza Rice said, "My country will not tolerate illegal actions by the Minutemen vigilantes" yesterday at a press conference here in Mexico City. The press conference took place at the Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (SRE) after her meeting with Mexico's Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez. Rice assured that her government "will not pardon any extra-legal actions by border vigilantes nor do we support the activities of these groups". She added, "Even though we can not interfere with these activities, you can rest assured that if they violate the law, they will be held accountable".
To: RegulatorCountry
Yes I saw it. She said. Bad Condi. The fact is, every border group prior to the Minutemen were vigilantes, the track record speaks for itself especially when it comes to Chris Simcox.
1,382
posted on
05/10/2006 9:45:04 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: ohioWfan
That old Mexican gov't is a real reliable source for factual data for us conservatives, isn't it? LOL!
And a Border Patrol that let hundreds of thousands of illegals march in our streets without a lick of enforcement action is good enough? Yeah, that's what I thought. (Nothing else you say will make one lick of difference, Old_Mil. You outted yourself in a BIG way last night).
My posting history speaks for itself. I'm anti illegal immigration, I'm anti-tax, I'm anti big government, I'm anti gay-agenda, and I'm anti-abortion. You can characterize that however you wish. To tell you the truth, I'm more than a bit comforted by the fact that given your posting history we seem to disagree on the major issues.
1,383
posted on
05/10/2006 9:45:22 PM PDT
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
To: Texasforever
And since it's obvious by now that you have no intention of answering my question and will only be here to demonize Simcox, which seems to be the new tact, I can only conclude that you haven't got the ability to form an answer of any kind and you're nothing more than a parrot.
BTW, what is your fixation with genitalia. That is what you mean with "little one", isn't it? If it isn't then PLEASE, clarify things for me. I'd hate to misconstrue what you're implying and give the wrong impression of you.
If that is what you're doing then it's pretty sad that you weigh the measure of a man by the size of his genitalia.
To: Texasforever
Little one I have told you for years that you are a complete joke and I treat you as such.
Thanks for sharing your opinion, not that I give it any weight whatsoever.
To: philman_36
If that is what you're doing then it's pretty sad that you weigh the measure of a man by the size of his genitalia. LOL You never fail to take the bait.
1,386
posted on
05/10/2006 9:48:14 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: rolling_stone
Thanks, RS. I had gone through all three of those reports yesterday evening, using the Applied Language website translantion service to augment my admittedly spotty Spanish, and I missed the implications of this. I guess it seemed routine, somehow, when in actuality it does undermine the contention that information was only exchanged after the fact, at the specific request of a detained Mexican national within the United States illegally.
To: Texasforever
Yes I saw it. She said. Bad Condi.THAT'S IT?! That's all you have to say about it? You sound like you're admonishing a dog!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Now THAT is funny!
The fact is, every border group prior to the Minutemen were vigilantes, the track record speaks for itself especially when it comes to Chris Simcox.
And here we go right back to the new gameplan...villify and demonize Simcox.
The jig is up! Give it up.
To: Texasforever
" The fact is, every border group prior to the Minutemen were vigilantes, the track record speaks for itself especially when it comes to Chris Simcox."
So, you're going on record here, saying that you do not support the Minutemen, and in fact agree with Condoleeza Rice, that they're vigilantes, despite the fact that they have operated completely within the law?
To: Texasforever
You never fail to take the bait.
So what "bait" do you "take" and where do you take it?
To: RegulatorCountry
So, you're going on record here, saying that you do not support the Minutemen, and in fact agree with Condoleeza Rice, that they're vigilantes, despite the fact that they have operated completely within the law? I don't support the Minutemen and yes Chris Simcox is a vigilante. Any other questions?
1,391
posted on
05/10/2006 9:55:34 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: Old_Mil
"To tell you the truth, I'm more than a bit comforted by the fact that given your posting history we seem to disagree on the major issues."
Uh oh, you're fixin' to get called a lying, creepy liar, lol.
To: Texasforever
...yes Chris Simcox is a vigilante.
So what crime has Simcox committed?
To: Texasforever
"I don't support the Minutemen and yes Chris Simcox is a vigilante. Any other questions?"
Nope, that about does it. Thanks!
To: Texasforever
To: philman_36
Yes. I really don't have a problem with vigilantes. I sometimes feel like exacting a bit of street justice myself. What I do have a problem with are nutcases like the leadership of all of the "border patrol" outfits. They are, to a man, the next crop of Tim McVeighs.
1,396
posted on
05/10/2006 10:03:49 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: Texasforever; Spiff
"What I do have a problem with are nutcases like the leadership of all of the "border patrol" outfits. They are, to a man, the next crop of Tim McVeighs."
Ping. Thought you'd be interested in this comment, since you were involved in getting the Minutmen off the ground.
To: Texasforever
Do you consider The Guardian Angels to be vigilantes?
Yes.Now that's interesting.
What I do have a problem with are nutcases like the leadership of all of the "border patrol" outfits. They are, to a man, the next crop of Tim McVeighs.
Well, do you have evidence that these people are insane or is this just more of your "little" tactics?
Nothing like the good old "tried and true", is there. (I always take the bait (wink, wink) don't I)
To: philman_36
So what crime has Simcox committed?I second this question. What has he done?
To: Texasforever
This question must have troubled you as you didn't answer it and went straight to the GA question, so I'll ask it again...
So what crime has Simcox committed?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,380, 1,381-1,400, 1,401-1,420 ... 1,441-1,444 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson