Posted on 05/07/2006 10:22:29 PM PDT by anymouse
The special interests got their exemptions and the rest of us get to pay through the nose.
But Allaway said business support for the plan could evaporate if the Legislature does not guarantee a future reduction of public school property tax rates to at least $1 per $100 of valuation. He said that level of property tax savings is needed to offset the new business taxes.
Bait and switch. If the Texas Legislature doesn't come through with the property tax reduction and just spend, spend, spend - they might as well take their name off the ballot as Texas Republicans will vote them out of office or just not vote.
"taxes because the tax is based on gross revenues, not net profit. "
==
How awful!
Need for Federal and STATE FairTax -- overtaxing businesses ping.
"But under a new business tax that has been approved by the Texas Legislature, Aztec would have owed $81,000 in taxes because the tax is based on gross revenues, not net profit."
BUMP
Need for Federal and STATE FairTax -- overtaxing businesses ping.HUH?"But under a new business tax that has been approved by the Texas Legislature, Aztec would have owed $81,000 in taxes because the tax is based on gross revenues, not net profit."
Fairtax rate:
`(1) FOR 2005- In the calendar year 2005, the rate of tax is 23 percent of the gross payments for the taxable property or service.
The problem with business turnover taxes is they cascade throughout the economy laying tax on tax creating an ever growing exponential burden on all production. These taxes were so bad, they were removed in Europe and replaced by VATs as an fix to correct the cascade of the tax from business to business growing without bound. A credit voucher system was introduced into the turnover tax to cause a pass through of the tax to end consumers retaining the control features over business to enhance governments ability to extract high levels of revenue from business activities. The result is what is now commonly called the a VAT.
A bit of history and the VAT and how it came about can be found here in a discussion of VATs, and teh Australian GST to there forerunner the turnover tax.
http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/johnquiggin/news/GST9806.html
"The VAT was introduced in France in 1954, to replace a system which relied a highly distortionary turnover tax on sales to supplement a rather ineffectual income tax system. The problem with a turnover tax is the 'cascade' effect arising from the fact that goods are taxed every time they change hands. The effective rate of tax on a good therefore depends on the length of the marketing chain from producer to final consumer. At even modest rates, cascade taxes are highly distorting. The VAT solves this problem elegantly, by allowing firms to credit the tax already paid on their inputs against the tax imposed on their sales. The net tax payable is therefore a fixed proportion of value-added. ..." "Like the metric system, the VAT was adopted by other European countries, and the use of a VAT was made a condition of membership of the European Union. Once again, the English-speaking countries had less need to make the change, and were slower to do so. Their income tax systems were more effective, and their wholesale and retail sales taxes were less distorting than cascade taxes. ..." |
Another argument for the simplicity of the FairTax. Need lots more public support. FairTax.org is bringing FairTax training to Texas in May.
See this link for dates:
http://fairtaxgroups.com/index.php?topic=110.msg3753#msg3753
FairTax (retail sales tax) in Texas would be 10-11% to replace all property taxes and business taxes according to a study by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. I'd sign up for that in a minute.
Changing Texas
A Fair Tax for Texas?
By Richard Vedder, Ph.D. and Byron Schlomach, Ph.D.
http://www.texaspolicy.com/publications.php?cat_level=6
(scroll down on this page to find the study)
FairTax (retail sales tax) in Texas would be 10-11% to replace all property taxes and business taxes according to a study by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. I'd sign up for that in a minute.
That would be a good move for a lot of states. with the combination of state income, property and existing sales taxes that percentage represents a typical rate for most places.
A Taxreform bump for you.
If anyone would like to be added to this ping list let me know.
On the federal level, John Linder in the House(HR25) & Saxby Chambliss Senate(S25) offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and SS/Medicare payroll taxes outright and replace them with with a national retail sales tax administered by the states.
H.R.25,S.25
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.Refer for additional information:
FairTax (retail sales tax) in Texas would be 10-11% to replace all property taxes and business taxes according to a study by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. I'd sign up for that in a minute.Sure, "replaced" for how long? 'Till the next legislative session when the children need more school money?
Couple that idiocy with the Fairtax dream rate of 30% national and you have a 40+% sales tax rate...
Texans oughtta go for that. 40+% sales tax would be great for their economy too.< /sarcasm >
fair tax bump
My taxes will go down with this, pretty substantially too. The problem is we will have created an income tax. A few years down the road, some sleazbags in Austin will decide they need more money to buy votes with and they'll up the percentage a little. And then they'll do it again a few years late. Rinse and repeat.
They need to simply cut proprty taxes by the amount of our surplus and leave it at that. If they need more money they can cut spending.
This new tax has nothing to do with property tax relief. That is part of the sales scam that has been promised to the homeowners. By the time this kicks in appraised value increases will have eaten up any proposed savings. These same Republicans, legislature and other elected officials, refused reasonable limits on tax increases during the previous session.
There will never be a shortage of stupidity. If we could figure out how to run electric generators on it, we'd have an energy source that would never run out.
It sounds like Perry has grabbed all the worst aspects of any tax scheme -- apply it selectively, let it compound through every level of production, and hide it from the consumer that will ultimately pay for it.
All of these things make it very different from the FairTax, but you just know there are yahoos that will equate the two.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.