Posted on 05/05/2006 1:35:32 PM PDT by RobFromGa
Sorry, Nightie, you SQLers are the ones who turned it into a "big thing" by not 'fessing up and admitting the error (and by not even finding it) and then by calling others who spotted it "liars".
I merely pointed out there WAS an error and kept saying so in the face of all your name calling.
Sorry, Nightie, you SQLers are the ones who turned it into a "big thing" by not 'fessing up and admitting the error (and by not even finding it) and then by calling others who spotted it "liars".No, you made it a big thing when you refused to say when asked nicely what this simple mistake was.
"asked nicely"???
Here are the first half dozen or so responses from you where you "asked nicely":
Here are the first half dozen or so responses from you where you "asked nicely":I didn't say I asked you nicely. When you first mentioned this error RobFromGa politely asked "what error is that?" and you started your silly game by replying "You can't bear to read your own posts???" and refused to say what the "error" was. This would not have even been an issue if you had just replied as nicely as you were asked.
And, of course, that gives you the right and the opportunity to jump in and do some bashing all the while (and even still) pretending to be so holier than thou.
The inference you draw about the meaning of my showing up the error is entirely youw own, Nightie, as I never once said (or inferred) that it was a "significant error" but merely an error. Can't give it up can you.
Robbie was given the opportunity to catch the error and say it was no biggie, but he - along with you and several other goons - chose not to do so. You lie in a bed entirely of your own choosing. (Do I need to put a smiley after that so you'll realize it's "pun intended"???)
The inference you draw about the meaning of my showing up the error is entirely youw own, Nightie, as I never once said (or inferred) that it was a "significant error" but merely an error.Bringing it up implies it was significant.
It implies no such thing ... and an inference is drawn. So you're wrong on both counts.
It implies no such thingI disagree. If weren't trying to make it a big issue, why wouldn't you just say what it was?
You can't infer anything from your own comments, you can only imply. When you go and pick up an economics textbook, get a grammar textbook too.as I never once said (or inferred) that it was a "significant error" but merely an errorand an inference is drawn. So you're wrong on both counts.
The inference was left for you and was not something I was doing from my own comments but something you were doing.
I had actually hoped that Robbie (and then later you since you coundn't resist jumping in) would read what was posted and understand what the error was. Several of you refused to do that and merely continued the name calling.
My good friend Dimp-Dimp was the only one of you Squirrels prescient enough to do so though other FairTax supporters caught it. Guess that means your all ignorant except Dimp-Dimp, eh?
I'm afraid you're the one needing the remedial reading since I've had adequate academic background in both economics and grammer ... at least I can read and when I point out an error you can bet it is an error.
You can't infer anything from your own commentsUnless you're schizo and don't know they were your comments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.