Posted on 05/05/2006 1:35:32 PM PDT by RobFromGa
You've really gone off the deep end with the newspaper list haven't you, Robbie? Going to make it your life's work to spam all posts with this new vanity nonsense of yours?
Who gives a rat's rear end???
By magic. No bureaucracy, no paperwork, no compliance burdens.
The "fair" tax fairy will make it so.
Monumental liars exulting in minutia.
In my posts pointing out the error Robbie, I never said it offended me - just that it was, which all of you but good, dear sweet Dimp-Dimp kept claiming was a lie on the part of anyone saying it was an error.
Perhaps Dimp-Dimp will give you free reading lessons.
I guess we can take this wishy washy post of your as admitting that, yes, it was an error and, no, those calling attention to it were not "liars" as you were repeatedly spouting. Goes to show the quality of your "research" on the FairTax.
See #524 Looey.
Nope, mojoron, there are prodcedures now in states to audit that sort of thing. they'll still be useful with the FairTax - and there are civil and criminal penalties that apply for someone who steals Federal funds donchaknow.
No magic is involved at all. And the state gets paid to do so making it hardly a "compliance burden". You should read the bill.
Hardly, mojoron, we merely point out your errors and then enjoy hearing you chiming in as a chorous of nitwits saying "liar, liar, pants on fire" like the children you are.
No it wasn't an error of any consequence piggie, it was no different from a typo in that regard. It had no bearing on the meaning of my post. You are reduced to thinking that you have scored something big when you have done nothing of the sort. See you in the next thread.
No. Aren't you ashamed to have doubted him?
Frankly, Nightie, you're making another error. I made no whopper in #446.
At any rate it it hilarious to see you guys backpedal and claim that YOUR errors are not really errors at all and instead of apologizing for lying about the fact that it was an error you're trying to interpret what I meant (the old straw man diversionry tactic of imputing what someone meant according to your warped interests and then calling him a liar because of your straw man) in a diversionary manner to try to call me a liar for being correct about it.
You guys are truly sick.
'Twas no game - just pointing out the fact there was an error.
You guys have been lying about it ever since ... and still are it seems.
No. Aren't you ashamed to have doubted him?Absolutely not. It turns out my doubt was justified. To turn that into some big "error" and go on and on for post after post was intentionally meant to give the wrong impression - otherwise known as a lie.
Frankly, Nightie, you're making another error. I made no whopper in #446.What! You can't see it? It's as plain as day...
At any rate it it hilarious to see you guys backpedal and claim that YOUR errors are not really errors at all and instead of apologizing for lying about the fact that it was an error you're trying to interpret what I meant (the old straw man diversionry tactic of imputing what someone meant according to your warped interests and then calling him a liar because of your straw man) in a diversionary manner to try to call me a liar for being correct about it.You got caught trying to cast doubt on robfromga's post by saying there was some big "error." You made a huge deal out of nothing in an effort to "give the wrong impression."
You guys are truly sick.Yeah, right....
Otherwise known as letting the SQL's turn up the volume in one of their group thunks.
Will today be the day Boortz tells the truth, or will it be just another regular Monday?
Well, I have been listening to him for over 30 years. Many times I have heard him treat callers the way he treated you. Now I know what must have been going on.
That's really funny, Nightie! I suppose you're talking about dropping the "c" from "distract" and while yes, that's an error, it doesn't even qualify except under your defitions of "typos" which you tell us are not errors (as least when you do them).
The error in #410 I referred to was not a typo, but a factual error (which since done by a Squirrel can be claimed to be "not an error", apparently). Nothing like your double standard.
Apparently none of you are man enough to admit your errors and instead try to manufacture a way to call other "liars" even when they are correct. Love hateful name calling, don't you? ... it must boost your ego.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.