Posted on 05/05/2006 1:35:32 PM PDT by RobFromGa
Interesting - I can't recall your "admitting" any error while I have owned up so several when pointed out.
I'll bet that means you have made none, doesn't it?
you are speaking gibberish again. but you are an expert at lying, I will give you that. if you want to call me a liar, show specifics-- your vague nebulous statements are tiresome.
Don't flatter yourself that they would paint your name all over the walls and just wait for you to call in in order to "dis" you as you claim.
They undoubtedly have plenty of other jerks that call in and don't know them either.
Your supercilliousness is overpowering however.
You can't bear to read your own posts???
Can't say I blame you ... or perhaps you can't recognize your own obvious errors. I'm sure you could easily find it if you'd try.
you never have anything specific to say, just mindless babbling.
Sounds to me like you're trying to distra t from and ignore your error in #410. Talk about "mindless babbling"!!!
Ok, I misspelled "single" as "singel"-- you caught me.
Sounds to me like you're trying to distra t from and ignore your error in #410. Talk about "mindless babbling"!!!Is this another one of your classic phantom "errors"?
Hammer —> Nail —> BAM!
Perfectly said, Dimples! :o)
That's the classic approach of squirrel-boy. He can't argue with facts or reason, so he makes up "errors" and obliquely refers to them while whining that anyone who disagrees is "attacking."
That makes 2 ... maybe you can find the other.
Sorry, PC, guess you're not able to spot the 2nd error (either). Not too surprising considering ...
Sorry...I live in the real world; not the B.S. "30% is really 23%" world you appear to inhabit.
Sorry, PC, guess you're not able to spot the 2nd error (either). Not too surprising considering ...Instead of playing your pathetic little game, why don't you tell us the "error"?
The federal sales tax would have been paid before it existed? "Fair" taxer logic.
Apparently your "real world" is just like that of the rest of the SQL Squadron - not too bothered with either accuracy (or honesty) and nopt interesting in seeking it out and correcting your own errors.
Figures.
You Squirrels who are so eager to attack any (perceived by you error) in anything FairTax aren't even willing or able to do so in your own "stuff".
If the Squirrels say so, it's absolutely pure, errors or not eh?
Better read that post again. Nowhere did it say "federal sales tax", but merely tax - income tax in the particular case.
One of the precepts of the FairTax as stated in the bill is that a thing would be taxed once and only once.
Typical Squirrel misstatement on your part Mojo.
False, naturally.
Actually it said:
"Used" for purposes of the FairTax legislation, means no tax previously collected on the item.
You Squirrels who are so eager to attack any (perceived by you error) in anything FairTax aren't even willing or able to do so in your own "stuff".What is this, the kindergarten playground? Quit playing "I Gotta Secret." If you think there is an error (which it is becoming more and more obvious there isn't) just tell us. Stop being a punk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.