Republicans Shouldn't Run Away from Bush

You forget the last part of the analogy, which is what happens to the girl after she leaves the dance with the stranger.

363 posted on 05/04/2006 9:08:46 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)

To: ideas_over_party

"You ought to be careful who you call a liar, Chief."

I always am. So far I've caught you in two lies on this thread.

364 posted on 05/04/2006 9:10:35 PM PDT by CWOJackson

Well I have decided to stick with the ones who brought me to the dance come hell or high water, and that is President Bush.

I don't see any one on the other side that can touch Bush with with a 10 foot poll.

I have seen lots of posts saying their not going to vote or support the president because of his immigration policy.

Well here is a prior post of mine concerning immigration and blacks turning away from their ignorant Democrat leaders and tasks masters.

I think Blacks are starting to see that amnesty serves them a bitter pill in the long run.

I believe that many Blacks with common sense are starting to see that they have been used by the elitist’s arrogant leaders of the Democrat party for the last 150 years.

Now all of a sudden they see the liberals willing to throw them aside like a used ham bone for what the Democrats see as new better controlled inhabitants for the plantation.

Problem is the legal common sense Mexican/Americans see this free give away legislation as cheapening of the citizenship they had to earn.

Actually this whole scenario is beginning to be some fun sitting and watching the twisting and turning machinations and doings of the RINOs and the Democrat Demagogues.

As usual these kiss up philanderers to big money took what they thought was the safe side by jumping early but now find themselves on the wrong side of the issue.

Now that public opinion has switched even further against amnesty, the Murdering Ted Kennedy's and John McCaniacs are in the super minority with their free for all, give away for nothing citizenship legislation to garner votes.

McCaniac with his stand with Murdering Ted Kennedy can kiss his future aspirations for president in the by and by.

McCaniac needed a strong base and he just shot his big chance in the butt, P!$$!ng on those who he needed to support his inane campaign.

Hairy Rid and Nancy Poopalosie have once again shown the voters why the Democrats are sucking Republican exhaust fumes on the 2006 election highway.

I find it quite comical that every time the Democrats have an opportunity to stand up for America they are lying off in the weeds waiting to ambush the majority's wishes.

This current crop of Democrat leaders are nothing more than the laughing stock of every third world wannabe politician.

Well that is my lowly opinion of how I see the current situation on immigration.

I am sticking with the president even though I do not necessarily agree with him on immigration.

366 posted on 05/04/2006 9:12:51 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)

To: ideas_over_party

"You know something? You really aren't worth any more time. You don't - and never have - wanted to debate any issue. "

LOL! But I do, two issue in fact:

1) How can you say you'd never vote for a liberal AND say you would vote for Liberman?

2) How can you claim that the only reason you would vote for Liberman (when you would never vote for a liberal) is because of his stance on the WOT when just a few minutes before you said the only reason you would vote for Liberman (when you would never vote for a liberal) is because you think he's a nice guy?

367 posted on 05/04/2006 9:15:34 PM PDT by CWOJackson

To: ideas_over_party

"I didn't say I WOULD vote for him."

"The only situation I WOULD ever vote Democrat would be a McCain vs Lieberman match - based entirely on my impression that at least Lieberman is a generally decent man."

369 posted on 05/04/2006 9:26:18 PM PDT by CWOJackson

To: ideas_over_party

"I didn't say I WOULD vote for him."

But you would vote for him..."Based on his support for the WOT - which after McCain's "Bill of Rights for terrorists"....

and, "based entirely on my impression that at least Lieberman is a generally decent man."

371 posted on 05/04/2006 9:28:43 PM PDT by CWOJackson

To: ideas_over_party

"Theoretical vs what would actually happen in 2008."

You never used "theoretical" in your excuse for voting for a liberal, which you would never vote for.

372 posted on 05/04/2006 9:29:56 PM PDT by CWOJackson

To: ideas_over_party

"Ah, but then I looked him up on the ACU website."

Perhaps you should have done that before you said you would vote for him:

1) because of his WOT stance, or

2) because he's just a nice guy, or

3) because you would never vote for a liberal even though he is one.

374 posted on 05/04/2006 9:38:33 PM PDT by CWOJackson

To: ideas_over_party

I don't want to win you over.

375 posted on 05/04/2006 9:41:45 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)

Not a very good script either.

376 posted on 05/04/2006 9:43:09 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)

I don't think Soros is giving them the money he used to so hiring good help is probably out of the question. They're stuck with volunteers.

378 posted on 05/04/2006 9:47:14 PM PDT by CWOJackson

>>"'There is no conservative agenda without Ronald Reagan,' Bennett said. 'He is the man who made whatever good has happened to this Administration happen, and people should be mindful of that.'<<

I agree with the basic premise that deserting the President is unwise for Republicans but you can't make analogies about President Bush43 and Reagan and conservatism. The spending, lack of vetos and the war in Iraq are not conservative. But that's not the issue. The issue is whether we stand together and whether we prefer Hillary or someone similar.

379 posted on 05/04/2006 9:47:20 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)

I am sticking with the president even though I do not necessarily agree with him on immigration.

Yet another sentence I wish I could fit into my tagline. :)

380 posted on 05/04/2006 9:47:41 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794