Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE. THE PICTURE IS BLEAKER THAN EVER
"Nealz Nuze" ^ | Tuesday, May 2, 2006 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 05/02/2006 8:30:41 AM PDT by upchuck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: ex-Texan
The only hope for American citizens is to get rich and become an expat living overseas.

That's our family plan in a nutshell.

41 posted on 05/02/2006 11:26:01 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (If you can read, thank a teacher. If you read English, thank a soldier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kenth
people involved in the drug trade

With 30% Federal taxes on sales plus state sales taxes the drug dealers will make more money in black markets. No need to fear the IRS -- Boortz abolished it -- and state tax enforcement can't compete with the mob.

42 posted on 05/02/2006 11:26:43 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
And, FWIW, I'm pissed that the government didn't long ago give me my own account to manage. I could have done better, MUCH better, than them buy hanging the WSJ stock tables on a wall and throwing darts to make the stock selections :)

Al Gore says that's a risky scheme, and who are you to argue with such a distinguished author? He's a 'Rat politician and therefore much more qualified to make your decisions than you are. Just ask the people in his home state of Tennessee, who by their decisive vote in the 2000 Presidential Election made it clear exactly who did NOT deserve to be President.

43 posted on 05/02/2006 11:30:06 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Imagine a system modelled after Euro style "single payer health care" (now there's a euphemism) but instead of being for universal healthcare, it is scoped to deal with any and all aspects of elder care. And like a national healthcare system, only the wealthiest would have any reasonable alternatives other than leaving the country. I cannot discount the possibility that even such exceptions might be made illegal. The voters really are that stupid. Just wait. About 10 years from now, the Left will be calling for what I just laid out, in order to "contain costs and keep Social Security solvent."


44 posted on 05/02/2006 3:06:03 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
The way that the will solve the problem is to institute confiscatory taxes on the social security payments of people who have saved a certain amount for retirement in their 401ks and IRAs.

No, they will solve it the same way they did in 1983 when SS went into a deficit. They raised the retirement age to 67, increased taxes, indexed the cap, and forced federal workers to join the system. This time around they will again raise the retirement age for full benefits, decrease the benefits for early retirement at 62 and/or raise the age, revise the formula to compute the annual COLA, and change the way benefits are computed further weighting it towards the lower end of the salary scale. They will also tax all SS. Both parties and the President will triumphantly declare that SS is now fixed and will be solvent forever, just like 20 years ago.

The 1983 Solution

45 posted on 05/02/2006 3:22:52 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Maybe so but if money's are confiscated by the government under a certain guise then the debt to the citizen must be honored.

My point is that there is no debt that has been incurred.

46 posted on 05/02/2006 7:39:28 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Yes there has. The government told people that they were taking money from them for this scam called SS. They would receive benefits in return. Uncle Sam may have spent it on everything else but the lie it told was that the money would be there.

Now, if the government were to say that in 25 years the program will be gone but the tazes will be phased out in that time then there's no real issue. Can you imaging the stock market boom that would occur if everyone out there started investing an extra $3,000 or more a year in the market? Can you imagine the capital that companies could raise to expand? How about the 7.65% tax cut that businesses would get on their payrolls? That would boost earnings and stock value...

and I just woke up from my daydream.


47 posted on 05/02/2006 8:08:55 PM PDT by misterrob (Death once came calling for Jack Bauer. Death went home to mommy with a wedgie and no lunch money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

That's a very pleasant daydream!


48 posted on 05/03/2006 9:16:03 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson