Skip to comments.
Saddam Hussein, Misunderstood (NY Times Alert)
NY Times ^
| April 30, 2006
Posted on 04/29/2006 5:41:26 PM PDT by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: jmc1969
Wow....they're into Damage Control a little early for November....
41
posted on
04/29/2006 8:05:13 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
To: jmc1969
Have these idiots read the Duelffer Report?
It continues to amaze me just how stupid and dishonest the mainstream press is. The truth is whatever they want it to be - getting the facts to the public doesn't matter.
To: popdonnelly
The New York Times is always on the ball...
Page 343, 9/11 Commission Report
It is hard now to recapture the conventional wisdom before 9/11.For example, a New York Times article in April 1999 sought to debunk claims that Bin Ladin was a terrorist leader, with the headline U.S. Hard Put to Find Proof Bin Laden Directed Attacks.
43
posted on
04/29/2006 8:37:41 PM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Clintonfatigued
The lyrics are good, but I don't know the song.
44
posted on
04/29/2006 8:37:43 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: CWOJackson
It's always so sad when a murderous butchering dictator gets misunderstood.The NYT is still Stuck On Stupid.
45
posted on
04/29/2006 8:48:18 PM PDT
by
TYVets
(God so loved the world he didn't send a committee)
To: jmc1969
Maybe the NYT's should try google. There are plenty of stories from late 2002 and early 2003 on how Saddam was not giving inspectors complete access. None other than Hans Blix delivered a report to the UN saying so.
To: freedumb2003
47
posted on
04/29/2006 9:16:45 PM PDT
by
Emmet Fitzhume
(America: Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.)
To: CWOJackson
The NY Slimes must be trying to get another pulitzer for their pathetic panty waist reporters. This one is too much even for the defenders of Stalin.
To: jmc1969; Digger
"The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. ATTRIBUTION: Thomas Jefferson (17431826), U.S. president. Letter, January 16, 1787, to Edward Carrington. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 11, p. 49, ed. Julian P. Boyd, et al. (1950)."Although the NY Times represents views which are antithetical to the spirit of liberty and the principles of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution, the First Amendment is too important to trash in order to silence its pages.
The marketplace could do that in a few months by simply not buying the paper.
Thomas Jefferson often was criticized by the newspapers of his day, but he understood the importance of a free press. He said:
"The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter."
ATTRIBUTION: Thomas Jefferson (17431826), U.S. president. Letter, January 16, 1787, to Edward Carrington. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 11, p. 49, ed. Julian P. Boyd, et al. (1950).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson