1- A missile strike...
2- Suicide operations...
3- Launch attacks...
4- Hezbollah to launch hundreds of rockets...]
PS: That's not a plan. It's a JOKE.
Posted on 04/29/2006 10:17:44 AM PDT by Mount Athos
Does there have to be an Iran? I doubt it.
Careful what you wish for, boys...
1- A missile strike...
2- Suicide operations...
3- Launch attacks...
4- Hezbollah to launch hundreds of rockets...]
PS: That's not a plan. It's a JOKE.
I've always wondered just how secret all these secret plans are we see on FR all the time.
Surprised it makes no mention of the sleeper cells that we know they have in the U.S. itself. This may be simple disinformation to confuse our intel...get us to miss seeing the "roundhouse swing" that is coming.
Hillary would be more likely to nuke some heavily conservative state, blame it on the VRWC, and declare war on anyone politically to the right of her own hindness, than she would be to oppose terrorism.
Remember how they practically tried to brand the NRA as a domestic terrorist organization?
This Iranian (and Islamic) posturing reminds me of the deception the Nazis used while building their military, when Europe was busy trying to appease them. By the time the lights went on the Nazis were as strong as they had portrayed.
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Verses what Bush is doing? Amenesty? Whats the difference?
I'm not a Democrat.......I'm speculating on a long shot.
With their recent track record of defeatism, a pragmatic Democrat would have to establish early a tough stance on self defense!
After all...even Democrats have kids.....and THEY are the ones concentrated in the cities where future potential terrorist events might occur!
I believe Joe Lieberman could win in 2008 if he could get through the primaries......
and if he formed a new party and ran as an independent.....there's a chance he could win.
BTTT
Heh... I don't think so.
It would be a crazy 'mouse trap' way of doing it, and I think Iran will be 'solved' one way or the other before 2008.
Though a president facing the OBVIOUS and OVERT threat, without the media on his(or her, heh) back for every little thing would almost HAVE to act.
Add in the democrats (properly) percieved weakness in National Security, PLUS if it was... a her... that would just be too much.
Iran would be a cinder.
Though, like I said, I'm sure we can come up with a much better plan that is much more within our control than that 'roadrunner' approach.
Except for Zell Miller, I can't think of a single demokkkRAT who has the spine to do what's right. Who are you thinking of?
No he never said amnesty.. Now let the liberals have their way... you will get amnesty and free welfare for all with my tax dollars after we become the United socialist states.
Secret plans for world domination are all the rage with today's impotent Muslims. If you're a wannabe Muslim power broker, you gotta have at least two or three. I read a few weeks ago that Iran might actually attack us with their submarine. The horror!
Yes, it does - "the al Quads Brigades will give the go-ahead for more than 50 terrorists cells in Canada, the US and Europe to attack civil and industrial targets in these countries."
Has it occurred to anyone that the lower Bush sinks in th polls and has less to lose, the more likely he will be to bomb Iran?
I'd rather his poll numbes were higher but this may be a silver lining.
I still think a massive destruction by conventional bombing of all military and quasi military locations and some 400,000 of the core elite military personnel will do the job.
Plus burying the nuclear facilities ENTRANCES with precision deep penetration munitions. This would reduce collateral damage as many sites are in populated areas and full destruction rather than simply burying them would kill more civilians.
With the core military and para-military "gone", the people would rise up and take out the Mullahs and their near term priorities would not be to excavate the nuclear sites but to reorganize the country.
For any Freeper involved with real life planning at a higher level, think seriously about this and bring it into the tactical and strategic mix (some action is already under way):
WOMAN POWER and I do NOT mean the MEK cult of Mariam Rajavi, can play a huge, effective part in the aftermath.
I wish I could go into details without giving away what exactly and put lives in danger, but think for yourselves, look at at how the Mullahs organized when they took over and apply the same formula.
You're right. I skimmed through too quickly and missed that at the tail end of a sentence...
hey, iran... i've got your judgement day right here.
They know that any such event that can be tied to Iran, would be an act of war, against which Bush could respond with the full force of the US military without any need for advance congressional permission
They share the center with the Saudis and their proxies
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.