Sen. Clinton wants barrier along border

New York Daily News (KRT) Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge ^ | April 23,2006

[Tribune7]

Here's the article at the above link

Voter fraud, again!
Posted: November 6, 2000
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

Stop the presses! I mean it. Stop the election!

Something is going on in Washington and California that will have a great impact on tomorrow's election -- and it stinks to high heaven.

Let me start by telling you how I found out about it.

A very good friend of mine, who shall remain nameless, has a long-time live-in housekeeper from Guatemala. The housekeeper has a daughter who just turned 18. The immigration status of both mother and daughter has been pending for years. Papers have been filed with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Hearings have been held. But they are not citizens.

This is very important: The daughter has not registered to vote.

But, a few days ago, the 18-year-old got a very attractively packaged "Dear friend" letter from Bill Clinton, paid for by the California Democratic Party.

Here's what it said (on one side in Spanish and on the other side in English): "While every election is important, the November 7th election will determine our future for the next decade, and beyond. The stakes are high for America's Latino families. And California is the critical battleground.

"That's why I'm writing. We need your help to elect a Democratic Congress.

"Despite our strong economy, many hard-working people still struggle to make ends meet. Quality, affordable health care, a world-class education, aging with dignity, and well-paid jobs are part of the American dream -- rather than an American reality -- for too many people.

"Electing a Democratic Congress is essential for our 'Families First' legislative agenda.

"Congratulations on your decision to register. Registering to vote is a basic responsibility of citizenship that far too many people ignore.

"Now that you are registered ...

"Can I count on you to vote Democratic on November 7th? "Will you make an extra effort to elect Democrats to Congress -- and to your State Legislature -- by talking to your family, friends and neighbors? "Remember: Your Vote is Your Voice.

"Su Voz, Es Su Voto. Make your voice heard on Election Day.

"Sincerely, President Bill Clinton"

Clinton letter in English. Click for full size.

Below that letter is a P.S. that explains: "Here is your personal Voter Identification Card. Sign your name, then detach your card. Bring your card with you to your polling place on Election Day. It will help your voting go more smoothly."

Apparently all the recipient needs to do with this Voter Identification Card is sign it to be eligible to vote. Keep in mind, this was sent to a previously unregistered voter.

As my friend points out, only the U.S. government knows her age and pending residency status, and, obviously her Latino background. How did this information wind up in the partisan political hands of the California Democratic Party? And what kind of impact will a mailing like this -- obviously utilizing a government database for political purposes -- have on the California legislative races? How widespread is this fraud?

This is making my head spin. The recipient of this letter happens to live in congressional and state legislative districts that are very hotly contested in Southern California. But this appears to be a statewide mailing from the Democratic Party headquarters in Sacramento.

It's mind-boggling. The fraud is so blatant. Yet, not a peep out of the Republicans. They apparently won't even know what hit them. The polls in recent days show them making big gains in this once-invulnerable Al Gore stronghold state. A mass mailing like this effectively registering tens of thousands of potential Democratic voters days before the election is a secret weapon held back deliberately to avoid detection, scrutiny and publicity. After the election, the party will be happy to pay a fine for any illegalities involved. Clinton will be out of office and untouchable as always. There will be a new regime in at the INS. And it will all be swept under the rug.

And who knows if this technique is not being deployed by other state Democratic Party units? I don't doubt it for a minute.

This is voter fraud, pure and simple. And those responsible include the president of the United States, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, possibly the Census Bureau and certainly the California Democratic Party.

I'm outraged. Are you?

[DLfromthedesert]

What about her big butt? That would more than cover it.

[Ursus arctos horribilis]

Coming down on both sides of the illegal immigrant issue, places Old Crusty astraddle a razor wire fence

[saganite]

The cost of putting a fence aroud her would be prohibitive, she's already surrounded by drones and cameras break in her presence.

[manwiththehands]

She flips and flops more than Kerry. I'll need to double my dose of Dramamine.

[don-o]

The Beast is on the move. Too funny!

[rfreedom4u]

Hitlery will want whatever will get her elected. Then she will piss all over everyone and try to convince them they like it.

[santorumlite]

her word playing games: I'm for a wall, but only (maybe) partly, and (perhaps) not for a wall in other places. As appropriate. And it's got to be a tough wall, but also humane. No amnesty, unless it's earned. She makes her Bubba look decisive.

[santorumlite]

Bush is for the 700 mile fence in the sensennbrenner bill.

Hillary called the 700 mile fence crimiinal.

Hillary wants a fence just in urban areas.

Bush signed onto the fence in the desert of all of arizona on sensennbrenner's bill.


Are you a hillary supporter? Because you are lying for her.

[umgud]

Lois Farrakan has uttered a few words of sense in his time also.

[LADY J]

"Hillary will never learn. She's now climbed on both sides of the fence issue to satisfy everyone."

And that is pretty tuff to do when you have those thunder thighs!!

[nicmarlo]

WHY IS HILLARY LOVED BY SOME HERE.

She's not loved, much less liked, by anyone here.

However, what she's "saying she wants" indicates, at the very least, that the attempted snow job for amnesty by another name isn't working so well with a majority of Americans. But that appears to be lost on some.

[santorumlite]

Hillary is a pathalogical liar.

She said to hannity she was for the real id act then railed against it when congress took it up.

But she has the media and triangulation on her side so she will be unbeatable in 08.

Harry Reid is Hillary's best friend he wouldn't let gop vote on amendments that would make hillary look liberal.


Hillary is also teflon hillary she just last week voted for amnesty and against enforcement bill.

Hillary gets praise from the same perot and buchanan voters that hate bush.

The hillary 2009-2017 reign is fast approaching. We will be having to look at her and hear her annoying voice into her seventies.

[NapkinUser]

"Are you a hillary supporter?"

No, but when she's right I'm not afraid to agree with her. Even a stopped watch is right twice a day.

"Bush is for the 700 mile fence in the sensennbrenner bill."

Show me the quote or an article that says that. I haven't read it. Bush sounds more in-tune with McCain-Kennedy than with Sensenbrenner.

[santorumlite]

Hillary is for amnesty. She will pass it as president with a pelosi house.

She will encourage more illegals to come here.

The clintons for 8 years did nothing about the border.

It was gays in the military, assault weapons ban, ruth bader ginsberg giving hispanics affirmative action.

Hillary goes to La Raza saying u.s taxpayers need to pay for illegals to go to college.

Hillary rails against real id act, bush signs it.

Hillary votes against more border agents and more detainee beds.

Hillary wants affirmative action for illegals.

Hillary wants complete amensty bush wants guest workers.

Bush is for sensenbrenner's 700 mile wall while hillary called it criminal.

Bush is for enforcement inland going after illegals hillary calls it criminal.

How is hillary better on the border issue than bush.


It is unreal that this leftist who goes to la raza conventions in san francisco is looked at as conservative.

I don't get it.

[santorumlite]

Hillary is for amnesty. She will pass it as president with a pelosi house.

She will encourage more illegals to come here.

The clintons for 8 years did nothing about the border.

It was gays in the military, assault weapons ban, ruth bader ginsberg giving hispanics affirmative action.

Hillary goes to La Raza saying u.s taxpayers need to pay for illegals to go to college.

Hillary rails against real id act, bush signs it.

Hillary votes against more border agents and more detainee beds.

Hillary wants affirmative action for illegals.

Hillary wants complete amensty bush wants guest workers.

Bush is for sensenbrenner's 700 mile wall while hillary called it criminal.

Bush is for enforcement inland going after illegals hillary calls it criminal.

How is hillary better on the border issue than bush.


It is unreal that this leftist who goes to la raza conventions in san francisco is looked at as conservative.

I don't get it.

[santorumlite]

Hillary is against the sensennbrenner wall.

She wants no walls in the desert. She called the sensennbrenner wall criminal.\

Hillary also praised the real id act to hannity then railed agianst it.

She really uses her triangulation power against you. Are you kidding me? Haven't you seen her act before.


After Sensennbrenner's bill passed the house Bush released a statement saying he was for the bill.

Hillary called that bill criminal and bush released a statement he was for the bill.


Hillary really did a lot during clinton's 8 years for the border.

Hillary voted against more detainnee beds and more border agents.

Hillary voted for amnesty in the ag bill.

Hillary last week voted against kyl's bill and for the kennedy bill.


What is it with hillary that no matter what she does she gets praise but bush gets spit on.

[NapkinUser]

"Bush is for sensenbrenner's 700 mile wall..."

Please prove that.

[OkieDoke]

How are the "masses misinformed in demanding a wall"?