This information is highly relevant, given rising oil prices. Leaving 10 billion barrels in the ground under the 'Arctic National Wildlife Resort' means we will be sending $700 billion or more overseas (adding to the trade deficit, and possibly aiding hostile nations & terrorists). You might want to ask your Congressman & Senators why they want to chop almost a trillion dollars out of our economy - in order to protect a wildlife project...
;>)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Who is John Galt?
"[10 billion barrels sitting under Wildlife Resort]"
That's no RESORT, it's a totally useless wastland!
Drill for the oil and eat the carabou!
66 posted on
04/21/2006 8:18:00 PM PDT by
dalereed
To: Who is John Galt?
Unlike many environmentalists I have actually visited ANWR and the vicinity.
Believe me the wildlife could care less if we drill on a couple of square miles of barren wasteland.
The argument ought to be about whether or not we should lock up these environmentalists for trying to destroy human life.
69 posted on
04/22/2006 6:01:32 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: Who is John Galt?
Nah! Let's keep giving money to our enemies!
75 posted on
04/23/2006 4:09:33 PM PDT by
airborne
(Satan's greatest trick was convincing people he doesn't exist.)
To: Who is John Galt?
This is great news. I hope gas goes to $5 a gallon, so we can finally get some drilling done and finally get some refineries built, for crying out loud.
To: Who is John Galt?
By opening up ANWR, we immediately gain tremendous long-term security in supply of energy, which means that we can consider using the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to deal with short-run problems in the supply and price of crude. Plus, our federal government's long-term fiscal position will strengthen enormously. We will achieve both cheaper, more secure supplies of energy and balance our federal budget. True, we will still have to fix the long-term insolvency of our entitlement programs and address our illegal alien/border problems, but - perhaps - by addressing two very tough problems, the Congress will get it into its thick skull that it should actually address our other urgent problems.
To: Who is John Galt?
It's something to be explored but it wouldn't solve our problems in the near term as any new exploration would take years to get set up and exploited.
80 posted on
04/24/2006 2:37:20 PM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq)
To: Who is John Galt?
Multi-billion barrel bump...
;>)
83 posted on
05/05/2006 3:36:24 PM PDT by
Who is John Galt?
("If you try any preversions in there, I'll blow your head off!" - Col. 'Bat' Guano)
To: Who is John Galt?
This information is highly relevant The relevant in formation is that the oil is worth $110 billion revenue to FedGov.
84 posted on
05/05/2006 3:38:00 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson