Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clean Diesel from Coal
Technology Review ^ | April 19, 2006 | By Kevin Bullis

Posted on 04/19/2006 5:56:25 AM PDT by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2006 5:56:28 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus

According to the Governors of WV and MT, the break-even point for coal gasification is $43/bbl.


2 posted on 04/19/2006 6:00:48 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I believe during the latter part of WWII, the german luftwaffe planes were flown with a fuel derived from coal.


3 posted on 04/19/2006 6:02:22 AM PDT by IrishMike (Dry Powder is a plus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

IIRC, Shell Oil is involved in a joint venture with PA and some other entities, building a gasification plant in PA right now.


4 posted on 04/19/2006 6:03:34 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
You are correct. Also, kerosene always came from coal, but it wasn't broken down the way they are talking about now.

The trick is to protect their capital investment from falling oil prices. How? Sell vast quantities into the futures market. This is what they are doing with wind power generated electricity.
5 posted on 04/19/2006 6:09:10 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Lots of energy sources in this price range, but require large investments. Few will take this risk when the arab cost of production is $4-5. (which means they can drop the price under your cost anytime they want) This difference is the reason that the arabs have played us on this global oil market since 1973. The only solution is to produce all of their oil and then get on to the alternatives.....which I think is what we are doing.


6 posted on 04/19/2006 6:10:21 AM PDT by cb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Long term contracts at a firm fixed price can redistribute the risk faced due to Arab, Mexican or Russian price arbitrage. Span the contract over about 7 years, and a potential arbitrager will suffer a great deal in the process.


7 posted on 04/19/2006 6:21:52 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Watching the Left turn on Senator McCain amuses me somehow....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
The trick is to protect their capital investment from falling oil prices. How? Sell vast quantities into the futures market

The problem is that a futures market for an untested fuel production system doesn't exist. Nobody is going to take the other side of the counterparty risk.

8 posted on 04/19/2006 6:25:27 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

bump


9 posted on 04/19/2006 6:25:28 AM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
having sat behind a diesel bus, there is nothing clean about diesel
10 posted on 04/19/2006 6:25:58 AM PDT by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
having sat behind a diesel bus, there is nothing clean about diesel

Europe is miles ahead of us in clean diesels.

11 posted on 04/19/2006 6:34:50 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM; cb
Since you folk seem to be into the economics of oil, I've got a question. I read somewhere back during the crises of the 70's that the royalties that oil producing nations charge per bbl. are deducted, dollar for dollar from the tax bills of US oil companies. Is this true?
12 posted on 04/19/2006 6:41:26 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cb

I think you got it just right.

Everything will take care of itself in the long run when the true cost of oil increases to the point that it makes various other alternatives feasible.

In the meantime though, we'll no doubt do everything we can to screw that up via politics.


13 posted on 04/19/2006 6:48:45 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cb
Few will take this risk when the arab cost of production is $4-5. (which means they can drop the price under your cost anytime they want)

Arab countries do not have the ability to produce enough oil to meet the worlds oil demand.

14 posted on 04/19/2006 6:56:13 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

No.


15 posted on 04/19/2006 6:57:43 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

T.Y.


16 posted on 04/19/2006 6:59:06 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Since you folk seem to be into the economics of oil, I've got a question. I read somewhere back during the crises of the 70's that the royalties that oil producing nations charge per bbl. are deducted, dollar for dollar from the tax bills of US oil companies. Is this true?<

All foreign taxes paid by US corporations including oil companies are deducted as credits from US taxes payable, dollar for dollar. The "royalties" paid by US oil companies were (during my working years) considered taxes by IRS and were therefore deducted from US taxes payable.

17 posted on 04/19/2006 7:04:22 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Back to Coal

Germany did it in WWII, we can do it now.

18 posted on 04/19/2006 7:27:17 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

PING! to #17


19 posted on 04/19/2006 7:34:01 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

It was my understanding that during the reign of the Sha, Kissinger suggested to him that he raise the royalties on oil in order to help Iran to pay for arms from the US. Kissinger's thought was that since these would be deductible by the oil companies, their relationship with the administration would not be hurt, the arms industries would get a boost, the Sha would get his arms and the only one to get hurt would be the US drivers.


20 posted on 04/19/2006 7:40:37 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson