Posted on 04/17/2006 3:44:47 PM PDT by Paddlefish
AK's are good, dependable weapons which fire a considerably larger caliber round than the M-16. The original M-16 was quite buggy, but I've cycled thousands of rounds through my Colt M-16 A-1 and it has never jammed once. I keep it very clean and don't live in a swamp or a desert, which probably makes a difference. Still, I have no complaints.
He's correct. It is a better gun.
Agreed, but all bullets will "tumble" or yaw, actually, to some extent.
The myth is that the M-16 round tumbles "in flight", which couldn't be more wrong. The 5.56mm round can actually be over-stabilized, causing the round to descent over its trajectory without a downward pitch.
The beauty of the Russian 5.45mm is that the tip holds a pocket of air, which dramatically increases fragmentation.
What most people fail to realize is that 99% (my very loose, but very supportable stat) of M-16/AR failures (usually FTFs)are caused by magazine problems. For a rifle what was designed around a relatively expensive and tight manufacturing process, why did they skimp on the mags? Cheap aluminum GI mags are no match against some of the modern steel mags. Check out the CProducts new Stainless Steel mag (around $25). From what I hear, it's equal to the $50+ HK steel mag. Myself, I've had great luck with the Singapore contract British steel mags.
I just have one thing to say Mr. AK...why does your design look like the German "Sturmgewehr"?
Check out the MythBusters episode on water stopping bullets.
Every round, including the .50cal, fragmented immediately upon penetrating the water. That's the main reason none of the rounds penetrated 6' under water. If those same rounds had been going slower, they might not have fragmented and might have penetrated 6' of water intact.
I was specifically speaking about 5.56mm (M193 and M855), which I've never seen fail to fragment in water or ballistic gelatin. Combat surgeons are retrieving fragments of 5.56mm, never whole.
Also, you can't really compare pistol rounds to rifle rounds. Pistol rounds are designed to retain as much of the original mass as possible. Since the target is 12" of penetration, fragmentation would remove the mass necessary to achieve suchy.
Modern "combat" ammunition is designed to fragment, lest they zip in and out without significant damage. Fragmentation is the key for military small arms (after shot placment, of course).
With M193, no. With M855, it will penetrate cover better than conventional 7.62mm. Look it up, it has been done to death.
And then they took the full auto from the M16 too.
Yep.
The SCAR-H can change everything.
The SCAR-L is no slouch, either.
However, I'm dismayed by the constant desire to use the weakest link in the AR system - the MAGAZINES.
last time I checked, newly manufactured civvie versions of the Stoner 63 are available
I saw that episode. I recall something different: rifle rounds penetrated the target all the way at the bottom of the water column, and a shotgun slug shattered the tank through transmitted shock.
So? The Kalashnikov works in both Siberia and Iraq. It's a working weapon, not a target range rifle.
yeah, I know... but at least someone has most of the needed tooling to make the military version
Spelling is no one of my strong points. (:>(
Wasn't "his" design a knock off of the German Sturmgewehr 44?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.