Skip to comments.
Everybody's Doing It: Abolish The Capital Gains Tax
GOPUSA ^
| April 17, 2006
| Rod D. Martin
Posted on 04/17/2006 12:38:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; ...
To: traviskicks
3
posted on
04/17/2006 12:41:07 PM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Abolish ALL taxes... except those that benifit me :>)
4
posted on
04/17/2006 12:42:45 PM PDT
by
irishtenor
(We survived Clinton in the 80s... we can survive even when her husband is gone.)
To: irishtenor
You rent-seeker, you. :-)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ancient_geezer
I agree with everything Mr. Martin says in this article but instead of tinkering around the edges why don't we simply force our elected representatives to enact the FairTax Act (HR25/S25) and be done with the communist inspired income tax once and for all!
Fairtax.org
6
posted on
04/17/2006 12:46:08 PM PDT
by
Bigun
(IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
To: Bigun
7
posted on
04/17/2006 12:52:49 PM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(.)
To: neverdem; Tolik; Carry_Okie; RightWhale; Congressman Billybob
8
posted on
04/17/2006 12:52:52 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
To: Bigun
My only problem with the "fair tax": We will inevitably get Democraps in control again at some point. They will then add a "new" income tax "just on the rich." Of course, that's how our current income tax started, so in 30 years we will have BOTH taxes.
Come up with a way to prevent that from happening -- probably a Constitutional Amendment -- and I'm on board...
9
posted on
04/17/2006 12:53:33 PM PDT
by
piytar
To: King Prout
Taxes discourage investment. While the gov't may get some revenue, the economy is restricted, which means less revenue for the gov't and less profit to the people. Lose-lose.
10
posted on
04/17/2006 1:00:22 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: piytar
You're O.K. with a 23% "fair" tax?!
To: clawrence3
Here we go again.
Because of inbedded taxes. Read the book.
12
posted on
04/17/2006 1:07:30 PM PDT
by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: PeteB570
I understand all about "hidden" taxes - my concern is that there are lots of people who pay less than 23% even taking into account all of those "hidden" taxes.
To: clawrence3
Beats the heck out of the 28% tax (after all adjustments) I pay now.
To: RightWhale; Carry_Okie
I reckon go for either a flat tax or a universal sales tax.
(I'm not even sure I'd support "progressive" sales taxes (raw necessities untaxed --> pure luxuries highly taxed) because, honestly, how do we trust those who'd define what is necessary and what is luxury?)
get rid of all other taxes.
15
posted on
04/17/2006 1:09:31 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I've got mixed feelings on this one. One the one hand, I firmly believe in promoting investment. I also believe in a reduced tax on income from an investment derived from saved income previously taxed.
However, it doesn't seem right for capital gains to receive no tax while ordinary income is taxed. Those who must work to survive will continue to pay ordinary income taxes and FICA and FUTA taxes. In essence, the very rich will a lower percentage of tax on their income than the poor and middle class taxpayers. I don't mind a flat tax, but I am not in favor of system that places a higher tax percentage wise on the poor than it does the rich.
16
posted on
04/17/2006 1:10:06 PM PDT
by
MBB1984
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Just pay all your taxes to me and I will be happy. Oh, and your beer.
What more could a man want? :>)
17
posted on
04/17/2006 1:13:10 PM PDT
by
irishtenor
(We survived Clinton in the 80s... we can survive even when her husband is gone.)
To: King Prout
Sales tax excepting food and built-in appurtenances of houses would be okay. That would let those who can barely afford Alpo get away tax-free.
18
posted on
04/17/2006 1:13:16 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: irishtenor
We don't need a damn govt. What we need are two divisions of law enforcement: Internal ( Police) and External (Military) and a small body that makes decisions on when to hammer a misbehaving nation or group. Taxes should be 2% for the "poor" and 5% for the "rich". Now am I being too radical here ?
To: taxcontrol
For you, I would agree, it would make sense (unless, of course, the Dems eventually add another income tax "just on the rich" again).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson