Posted on 04/15/2006 6:27:25 AM PDT by DollyCali
Edited on 04/15/2006 6:42:22 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
No matter...it puts to rest the claims of most abortionists about the fetus being nothing more than a "mass of tissue". What abortion is, is the brutal, horrific killing of innocent life like this...murder.
Need tissues!!!! That picture is wonderful, beautiful beyond words. Just amazing.
Thank you!
Goose bumps, just breathtaking.
So AWESOME!
Praise God!
GREAT PICTURE!
I remember the story well.
The baby was born Dec. 2, 1999.
I did a quick search, but haven't found a recent update.
The last I read, he was nearly 3 and learning to walk.
Awesome!
Oh my.. talk about "old" /new news! thanks for the update.. makes it even a more potent story.
From October of 2003: An Update on Samuel Armas "The Hand of Hope"
Samuel at play (from a summer 2003 Newsweek article)
thank you for these wonderful pix & further update/link
smooch!
Isn't this the picture that led to Drudge being released from Fox? He wanted to show it on his program, and they nixed it.
Did you catch the thread a few days ago saying that a fetus “feels no pain”?!
Here is MORE about that amazing photograph:
Story of "The Baby Hand"
RenewAmerica.us ^ | June 14, 2003 | RenewAmerica staff
Posted on 06/15/2003 6:07:50 PM PDT by Nan48
June 14, 2003
RenewAmerica staff report
Some of us may be familiar with a picture called "The Baby Hand," taken on Aug. 19, 1999, by photojournalist Michael Clancy for USA Today, which first published the picture. Clancy was assigned to document a spina bifida operation performed in utero on a 21-week unborn baby named Samuel Armas by Dr. Joseph Bruner, a surgeon at Nashville's Vanderbuilt University Medical Center.
Photo by Michael Clancy
The picture and its story have been circulated on the internet so often that some question whether they are authentic. They are.
Clancy describes the famous picture this way: "Samuel thrusts his tiny hand out of the surgical opening of his mother's uterus. As the doctor lifts his hand, Samuel reacts to the touch and squeezes the doctor's finger. As if testing for strength, the doctor shakes the tiny fist. Samuel held firm. At that moment, I took this 'Fetal Hand Grasp' photo."
In a story he wrote about the incident, Clancy added,
"As a doctor asked me what speed of film I was using, out of the corner of my eye I saw the uterus shake, but no one's hands were near it. It was shaking from within. Suddenly, an entire arm thrust out of the opening, then pulled back until just a little hand was showing. The doctor reached over and lifted the hand, which reacted and squeezed the doctor's finger. As if testing for strength, the doctor shook the tiny fist. Samuel held firm. I took the picture! Wow! It happened so fast that the nurse standing next to me asked, 'What happened?' 'The child reached out,' I said. 'Oh. They do that all the time,' she responded."Clancy said the experience changed him from pro-choice to pro-life.
Not only did USA Today run the photo, but so did a number of other media sources in the United States, Canada, Ireland, England, France, Norway, Singapore, and South America.
The photo generated controversy at Fox News, where then-talk show host Matt Drudge was prevented by the network from broadcasting the image on his show. That was in the early years of Fox, before the cable giant rose to the top by appealing to conservatives. Drudge
- -who is strongly pro-life- -quit over the dispute in the fall of 1999...-- snip --
Samuel was born on Dec. 2, 1999, weighing 5 pounds 11 ounces
- -four weeks premature. By all indications, he appeared healthy. Today, he's a "chattering, brown-eyed 3½-year-old."-- snip --
Samuel Armas, June 2003 CLICK HERE for the rrest of that thread
yes, just got a FReepmail that mentioned this was the pix that got Drudge canned at Fox
Wonderful post thank you Ron.
All.. I am not terribly bright sometimes. I needed 2 hours ago to get away from computer & tackle my yard.. so what do I do? Post a thread!
lol...
I will catch up later .... thanks in advance for the pix, info you ALL add.
:o)
Amazing.
Dr. Bruner does not only perform fetal surgery -- he also aborts babies with spina bifida and other birth defects if that's what the parents want.
http://www.catholic.org/prwire/headline.php?ID=69
I was a patient of his a few years back, and being in the exam room with him was like being in a very small room with a very large snake. It was chilling. There was no regard for my child as my child -- either this was a fatal condition or it wasn't. If it was, better luck next time. (We still weren't sure what the situation was until my son was born, healthy and 8 lb)
A friend of mine had a baby with holoprosencephaly around 10 years ago and he actually yelled at her and had her convinced that it was cruel to let her child be born because it would be in terrible pain. But terminating was fine because the baby couldn't feel a thing. Which is it?
The picture IS a great one, but the doctor has said in an article that he took the hand out, himself, because he thought it would make a good picture. He made a point of saying that since the mother was anaesthetized, naturally the baby was as well. I remember pulling it from Nexis once, some time ago, and can find it again on Monday when I'm back in the office, if anyone's interested. It does make sense, though - if she's out cold with anaesthesia, so is the baby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
