Skip to comments.
Morris: At last, Hillary looks stoppable
The Hill ^
| 4/12/06
| Dick Morris
Posted on 04/11/2006 5:09:39 PM PDT by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
1
posted on
04/11/2006 5:09:42 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
When was that out of touch monster unstoppable?
2
posted on
04/11/2006 5:11:39 PM PDT
by
Conservomax
(There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
To: Conservomax
Warner will clean her clock.
A Warner/Bayh ticket will be hard to beat.
3
posted on
04/11/2006 5:13:13 PM PDT
by
zarf
(It's time for a college football playoff system.)
To: neverdem; Mia T; cloud8; new yorker 77; NYCConservative; nycfree; fieldmarshaldj; ...
"While the former first lady was leading her main opponent, John Spencer, 61-31 in Zogbys Jan. 13 poll, her lead is down to 54-33 in his survey of March 27."
That is a noteworthy developement.
4
posted on
04/11/2006 5:13:38 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Bob Taft for Impeachment)
To: JeanS
How can one stop Hillary Clinton?
Hmmm...I'm trying to think of an answer that wouldn't get pulled.
5
posted on
04/11/2006 5:14:56 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(Rich's Undeniable Truth of the Day: Hillary Clinton is a lying slag.)
To: Clintonfatigued
he ought to run some side by side ads of her previous statements about illegal immigration - versus what she said this week at the rallies. it would be a perfect ad, it clearly highlights what a two faced liar she is.
6
posted on
04/11/2006 5:15:32 PM PDT
by
oceanview
To: JeanS
So is Spencer using Pirro's top tag line?
Vote for someone who actually wants to be your Senator.
7
posted on
04/11/2006 5:16:49 PM PDT
by
Boundless
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: JeanS
If Spencer can get the funding his standing in the polls warrants, he could be part of a one-two punch (with Al Gore providing the knockout) to stop a second Clinton presidency Morris is counting on a Spencer win in New York and Al Gore winning the primaries?
Forgive me if I'm not convinced.
To: JeanS
Okay, now I am worried. He has never been right about anything.
10
posted on
04/11/2006 5:20:28 PM PDT
by
kara37
To: RichInOC
Reposes her Broom?
11
posted on
04/11/2006 5:23:53 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Father of the Beeber)
To: Javelina
Warner is going to destroy her. A Warner/Bayh or Warner/Richardson will be a hard ticket to beat. Agreed. The Dems are so desperate to regain the White House I predict they'll "sell out" and nominate a moderate, much like the GOP did in 2000.
To: JeanS
What I can't understand is why anyone ever listens to currently or ever has listened to the little pervert.
To: JeanS
DM has not been right no matter how badly he wants to be right.
Hitlary will win Dem Nomination, and only Mcain or Guiliani, maybe Powell can stop her.
Yeah yeah yeay they are RINOs, but not even these RINOs can outspend W.
To: zarf
As for Gore, he has already proved that he can get more votes than the Republican. He just needs to get them in the right states this time. Gores popular-vote success is likely to play well when Democrats contemplate the Kerry debacle, just as Nixons narrow defeat in 1960 looked pretty good after the pasting Johnson gave Goldwater in 1964, good enough to give Nixon another chance.Gore might have been able to build on his near miss had he been a gracious loser or not left oodles of sound clips to show how whacked out he is ("He played on our fears, he led us into an immoral war . . . !")-- and while this would not stop him from getting the nomination, the Democrats have never renominated a loser since Adali Stevenson in 1956.
Even Hubert Humphery, who came so close in 1968, got passed over. Gore is no HHH in either personality or speaking ability.
I agree that a Warner-Bayh ticket would be hard to beat-- but it would have an even harder time getting nominated by the moonbat base. Put Joe Lieberman and Ben Nelson on a ticket and I might even vote Democrat.
15
posted on
04/11/2006 5:28:40 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: JeanS
Suddenly, thankfully, it does not seem that Hillary Clinton is on an automatic trajectory to become the next Democratic nominee for president.Say it ain't sow, Dick.
Run Hillary Run!
16
posted on
04/11/2006 5:28:55 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: RichInOC
17
posted on
04/11/2006 5:29:15 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(WARNING: This post may irritate John McCain.)
To: NittanyLion
"Agreed. The Dems are so desperate to regain the White House I predict they'll "sell out" and nominate a moderate, much like the GOP did in 2000."
If that happens, a far left moonbat like Nader, Kucinich, or Feingold will run as an independent and split the democrat vote nearly in half.
18
posted on
04/11/2006 5:30:43 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(Avoid Evian Flu--Don't Drink Bottled Water.)
To: JeanS
Hillary will be easy to stop.
She carries more baggage than a 747!
19
posted on
04/11/2006 5:31:08 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(Born a ham but never cured.)
To: Boundless
Spencer was in the race before Pirro.
He is a taking on Bloomberg and the NY City Council over guns and is anti-amnesty.
20
posted on
04/11/2006 5:32:57 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Sedition and Treason are both crimes, not free speech.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson