Schools reject Gay-Straight club

The Charlotte Observer ^ | Apr. 11, 2006 | Steve Lyttle

[Between the Lines]

(claps hands in unison with other fundie busybodies).

Do you mean fundie like in fundamental Christian, or fundie like in fundamental right to sexual orientation? Everyone is a fundamentalist nowadays, and all are promoting their own agenda.

[DBeers]

I guess one could consider the Federal Equal Access Act of 1984 to be a clearly established federal law; however, interpretation is key AND in this case is not rightly placed with the legislature that wrote the law but rather has been hijacked by the unelected liberal it takes a village crowd -in this case the judicial men in black...

I seem to remember the law being written to give equal access to Constitutionally guaranteed activities e.g. Religion.

Does anyone really believe the law was written to provide access to and recognition of clubs premised upon unlawful, disordered and even premarital sex in schools? It is a fact that sodomy was illegal in many States in 1984; 9 years prior to the Lawrence decision in 2003. Underage sex is still illegal...

I think the legislature that wrote the law would disagree as would I or anyone else with an ounce of common sense that the liberal interpretation of the law is not "clearly established" BUT rather clearly errant and clearly deviant; LOL

[DBeers]

Yay, Big Brother telling kids what to think!

Don't forget Big Sisters -they too have opened thier arms to and been infiltrated by homosexual activists that are telling kids that homosexual sex is okay!

[Ursine_East_Facing_North]

The Boy Scouts, unlike the homo-clubs, is not a group which focuses on (I would say obsesses over) its members' sexual orientation.

The fact that they exclude gay scout masters would argue otherwise.

No more so than their excluding convicted murderers from being Scoutmasters argues that the BSA obsesses over its members' "death-of-others orientation."

[FerdieMurphy]

...kids are imperfect creatures who tease each other, and sometimes cross a bigger line and hit each other...

I can only wonder what this has to do with the perversion that is homosexuality.

Perhaps in their meetings (the agenda of which will be that of the homosexual)the attendees will be treated to a special showing of Buttcrack Mountain.

Healthy youngsters should never be exposed to the insipid dangers of "discussion" meetings with those foul creatures whose only interest is in recruiting and ruining the lives of others.

[FerdieMurphy]

....we have it at our school.

If there's absolutely nothing that you can do about it you have my sympathy.

For those parents who do not want their children to associate in a "discussion" group with screwed-up homosexual children, then it's time to kiss the goobermint schools which facilitate this evil a goodbye.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Ah but you will be tagged as insensitive and bigoted for those remarks. Then they will claim that you are hindering the education of so-called homosexual students because you are making them feel bad. You are, in fact, a bully (so would be the claim) and proof that the issue must be addressed.

So my point is that every kid gets teased and "bullied" (by their definition). They are fallen creatures. But these efforts aimed at only "keeping safe" those kids with confused sexual desires and/or behavior ignores everyone else's needs and doesn't even do what it claims to do. If you want to keep them safe, teach them that homosexuality is wrong.