Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Diego Fence Provides Lessons in Border Control
NPR ^ | 4/6/2006 | Ted Robbins

Posted on 04/07/2006 9:27:26 AM PDT by bordergal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2006 9:27:27 AM PDT by bordergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bordergal
the fencing has simply forced immigrants to take more dangerous routes through the mountains and scorching-hot deserts.

It would seem to me the solution is to fence the entire border, for the safety of the illegals, and in the best interest of the United States.

2 posted on 04/07/2006 9:31:50 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Build a Real Border Fence, and enforce Immigration Laws!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8
the fencing has simply forced immigrants to take more dangerous routes through the mountains and scorching-hot deserts.

Yep, and bank vaults are simply forcing bank robbers to take more drastic measures, late in the evening.

3 posted on 04/07/2006 9:37:21 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bordergal

"Good fences make good neighbors."


4 posted on 04/07/2006 9:38:10 AM PDT by Semi Civil Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant
"Here in San Diego, we have proven that the border infrastructure system does indeed work," Henry says. "It is highly effective." It works for about 14 miles.....that is why the illegals head to the east county of San Diego to come in. That fence needs to run the length of the southern border of California.
5 posted on 04/07/2006 9:42:11 AM PDT by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bordergal
"The men would come for a number of months out of every year and return (to Mexico)," Smith says. "Now, not only are the men staying, but they're bringing their families."

How about some supportive material, you filthy apologist.

6 posted on 04/07/2006 9:46:17 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty

The weakness is still the ocean. Anybody can take a boat from Mexico containing anyone and anything and motor it up to the U.S. The Customs agents agree this is a big problem and no practical solution to it has been proposed.


7 posted on 04/07/2006 9:47:27 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bordergal
What this article shows it that those fences are a step in the right direction.

You cannot completely close prevent people from crossing the border. You can however keep making it harder, more dangeous, and more costly to cross, until you've reduced teh flow to a trickle.

An estimated 3,600 people have died crossing the U.S. border since the fences went up.

I am unhappy to hear that these people died as a result of the choice they made. However, they died as a result of their own illegal actions, and the US government has zero responsibility for their fate.

We are seeing evidence that the fences can work, they however need to be expanded.

I'm not convinced that fencing it the best solution in all areas. I also expect that these fences are going to need to be backed up with more manpower once they are expanded and become harder to get around.

However, the evidence shows they work.

8 posted on 04/07/2006 9:49:13 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty
That fence needs to run the length of the southern border of California.

Correction:

That fence needs to run the length of the southern border of the US.

9 posted on 04/07/2006 9:49:32 AM PDT by Disambiguator (Unfettered gun ownership is the highest expression of civil rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

I hereby notify the IRS, the Congress and our Eunuch-in-Chief that I am willing to pay an extra 1% in taxes for one year to build a 20 foot high and low [to cut off tunnels] all along the border.


10 posted on 04/07/2006 9:56:22 AM PDT by capecodconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bordergal
It is keeping people in the United States who used to go back to Mexico. "The men would come for a number of months out of every year and return (to Mexico)," Smith says. "Now, not only are the men staying, but they're bringing their families."

This writer tries to discourage fences in the end with the unintended consequences quote.

Bottom line- The fences work where they are installed.

11 posted on 04/07/2006 10:12:58 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bordergal
An estimated 3,600 people have died crossing the U.S. border since the fences went up.

IOW, the fences are working!!! Sorry to say it, but those who died trying to break into our country sound like Darwin Award candidates.
12 posted on 04/07/2006 10:14:42 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
The weakness is still the ocean. Anybody can take a boat from Mexico containing anyone and anything and motor it up to the U.S. The Customs agents agree this is a big problem and no practical solution to it has been proposed.

But a lot fewer would be doing this.

There is a problem: securing the Mexican border will take a lot of money. The only likely way to justify the expense would be to justify it as security against terrorists infiltrating the U.S.

The problem: the terrorists are most likely to enter Canada as refugees, get Canadian citizenship and welfare benefits, and cross the border legally on a Canadian passport...

13 posted on 04/07/2006 10:18:31 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

"The weakness is still the ocean."

Sharks. Sharks w/ lasers strapped to their heads.
No, you're right. I guess we should just `roll-over' then . . .


14 posted on 04/07/2006 10:22:48 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bordergal

When Rudy Giuliani took over as Mayor, New York City was widely viewed as being "ungovernable". Crime was out of control, and there was seeminly nothing anybody could do about it.

Giuliani said "Nuts" to that, and proceeded, step by step, to enforce the law and reduce crime. After 8 years, New York City is the model that everybody else in the country follows.

Moral of the Story: Don't believe it when people say that it can't be done. That just means it is going to be more difficult. This job can be done.


15 posted on 04/07/2006 10:37:09 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (RICE 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
>That fence needs to run the length of the southern border of California.

Correction: >>That fence needs to run the length of the southern border of the US.

And that fence doesn't have to be more than 10 foot wide strands of razor wire. This could be laid down in a MONTH. Enough gaps need to be allowed for regular traffic and monitoring by Border Patrol agents between existing Ports of Entry. It doesn't make sense to have miles and miles of open fields and a few agents to patrol the whole area. To me, it means that transgressions are a wink and nod. Saying we are going to "beef up" over 5 years, with new agents and drones is insane.

If the borders of Iraq can be made secure, so can ours..

16 posted on 04/07/2006 10:49:53 AM PDT by glowworm ( Liberal thot is truly a mental condition... Seek help!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Dolphins are much smarter and easier to train.


17 posted on 04/07/2006 10:52:17 AM PDT by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Dolphins are much smarter and easier to train.


18 posted on 04/07/2006 10:52:18 AM PDT by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: capecodconservative
I hereby notify the IRS, the Congress and our Eunuch-in-Chief that I am willing to pay an extra 1% in taxes for one year to build a 20 foot high and low [to cut off tunnels] all along the border.

He's still issuing 1 million tourist visas per year to Mexicans, and those illegals come in even with the most secure fence imaginable - he has to start scanning Mexican visas on entry and confiscating them from the millions that are misusing them

19 posted on 04/07/2006 1:02:32 PM PDT by Pa' fuera (I support family reunification.......through deportation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
The only likely way to justify the expense would be to justify it as security against terrorists infiltrating the U.S.

another way to justify it is that it will pay for itself by saving us money on detention facilities, health care, court proceedings, education, law enforcement, English classes, and all the other costs (financial and otherwise) that the illegals bring upon us

20 posted on 04/07/2006 1:07:00 PM PDT by Pa' fuera (I support family reunification.......through deportation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson