Posted on 04/04/2006 2:17:28 PM PDT by Eaglewatcher
Of course--but it can only be countered by means of new legislation. Each "dodge" will provoke new legislation. The result will be the same sort of complicated mess that we have today with income tax--and we'll still have income tax, to boot.
we can flag that business to be audited.
An audit will find nothing: the law doesn't say that a good's "new" price must be greater than its "used" price. A new law will be required to effect that.
Statists on the right never think they have anything in common with statists on the left. You favor a plan that continues to rape the American people of trillions yearly, through taxation, inflation and the sale of government debt.
No, but I do think that the armed services are necessary and I want for them to have all of the latest gadgets--that requires money.
The plan you are advocating doesn't just pay for guns. It also pays trillions for butter. Bush's latest "prescription butter benefit" being the worst example in history.
Maybe you believe, as the liberals do, that we don't need our armed forces...
You're working hard to convert me into a liberal. It won't work: it's you who favors big government, just like your pals on the left.
Well that settles that. I don't believe you and if this nonsense ever comes anywhere near a national debate, politicians will consider it a source of embarassment and anyone with a modicum of common sense will laugh and wonder how in hell it ever got that far.
Well, at least it seems that I've taught you a new word. And remember, if you use it 3 times, it's yours.
In case you didn't know, the tax base -- meaning those who will be paying the tax is greatly expanding, so the average person will not be paying the same.
Now c'mon. Tell me the real reason that you like the present system. Do you benefit from it that much that you subject your children and theirs and the rest of the country to this abominable system that we have now?
Then you and he both are hopelessly lost.
Now there's a way to win people over to your side.
Thanks for revealing how little you know about this plan.
Thank you for proving the politicians right: people are ignorant suckers. Their control over we their slaves is secure.
I am 100% aware of what taxes are eliminated and how much money will be saved. Thanks anyways. It does not add up.
In a 2005 test of the system by the Treasury Inspector General, 35% of answers were incorrect. The Treasury Inspector General tested the system again to measure the quality of the taxpayer assistance during the 2005 filing season.
The bad news, according to a Nov. 15 Government Accountability Office report: The accuracy rate for responding to tax law questions was basically unchanged from 2004.Since 1988, Money magazine has conducted an annual study where 50 tax professionals, including attorneys and certified public accountants, have been asked to complete a tax return for a hypothetical family.
The results have been unnerving. The professional preparers come up with different results each year -- with spreads of as much as $1,000.The bad news is that IRS advice is not binding -- whether given in person or in print. You also can't rely on IRS publications, even the famed Publication 17, Your Federal Income Tax. If there's a mistake in print -- tough! MSN Money - Can you turn to the IRS for tax help
One famous demonstration of excessive complexity comes from Money magazines annual test of tax experts, who are asked to compute taxes for a hypothetical family. In 1998, the 46 experts surveyed came up with 46 different answers; their calculations of taxes owed ranged from $34,240 to $68,912.IPI Publication Quick Study- IPI Policy Report - # 168
60,000+ pages of tax code is an invitation to cheat and very easy to make mistakes. Plus, the IRS uses the code and it's power to abuse taxpayers. See IRS Abuse Reports.
Any business that had an operations manual that's as convoluted as the federal tax code would never survive let alone get off the ground in the first place. Not, IBM, not Exxon/Mobile, not Wal*Mart, not General Electric, not Microsoft, not Citibank and certainly not any medium or small business.
The tax code is huge. It's an ocean of accidents waiting to happen. It's everywhere and nowhere. Understanding and accurately applying the tax code is like trying to nail Jell-O to a wall. And they call it law. It's not objective law -- it's chaos.
Read this thread, I already have as I have in hundreds of other fairtax threads.
The other poster and I have a history and I dare say, an emnity towards each other. I've long since stopped trying to convert him and now love to taunt and ridicule him.
I did prove the pols right. You are ignorant of the facts and are willing to endure the income tax rather than a plan that is clearly better.
I would bet everyone who disagrees with you is "hoplessly lost".
No, just the ones who are willfully blind.
Okay, then I would bet that nearly everyone who disagrees is also "willfully blind".
On the contrary, the fact that you're willing to keep playing the politicians' game is exactly what empowers them.
I don't believe you and if this nonsense ever comes anywhere near a national debate, politicians will consider it a source of embarassment and anyone with a modicum of common sense will laugh and wonder how in hell it ever got that far.
55 members of congress have already signed on to support the FairTax (H.R.25). Perhaps of greater importance is that 80% of people that educate themselves on the FairTax or attend a FairTax presentation support it. The cat's out of the bag.
fairtax.org
search: "national sales tax" OR "national retail sales tax" OR "fairtax"
Badray: Now c'mon. Tell me the real reason that you like the present system.185Always Right: Read this thread, I already have as I have in hundreds of other fairtax threads.192
That's a keeper. You're a squirrel through and through.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.