Posted on 03/28/2006 9:15:39 AM PST by Reagan Man
Lol! You gotta love Donohue!
He's great. Too funny.
"
IS IT OK, FOR A FATHER TO HAVE A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS 18 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER (THAT IS CONSIDERED AN ADULT)?"
OK, fourth and last time.
OK? No, not in my opinion, its a sin.
Legal? Yes, if the don't get married.
Marriage? No way -not legal and that is a good thing.
Equal rights yes, special rights no.
But they do have equal rights! A homosexual has exactly the same rights as a heterosexual. A homosexual may marry one person of the opposite sex and enjoy every opportunity that anyone else enjoys.
See, the truth is that homosexuals want to change the consequences of their own decisions. It's like complaining that the fact that robbing banks will get you arrested, while those who don't rob banks are able to remain free is discriminatory and unfair. In both cases, it is the consequences of their own choices, consequences of which they are perfectly aware, against which they rebel!
The same argument could be made by those who want to be married to a child, seven women, or a car. When our law refuses to recognize or condone those "marriages", it is likewise not discrimination.
Whoops one little error - last word - instead of "you" should have been "them".
" I do not think consensual sexual relationships between a father and his adult daughter should be illegal. "
Well then you are either a member of the United Church of Christ or you could become one. Satanism would also be a very good choice as well. This is how they think you will be welcomed with open arms.
Side note it is obvious that you are also an anarchist. Apparantly all behavior among consenting adults is ok with you. The hidden little secret that you dont get (you probably dont have kids or were absent in their rearing) is that all this behavior affects them. If it affects them then it will affect our society. No rules, no constraints no limits. Everything is ok as long as it makes you feel good. Dont expect a functioning society for very long - radical islam looks for societies like this that have instituted PC intolerant tolerance - because they know that you would never restrict their ability to persecute them.
TCris, I agree with you. I oppose legalizing homsexual marriage.
Oh well, off to work, I've delayed as long as possible.
If homosexuality were based in reason and was an easy sell the ACLU's coercion project would be unnecessary. Considering that it is not,they need jackbooted thuggish lawyahs to force homosexuality upon America.
If love is all that matters, maybe consensual incest should be made acceptable. What's next the fight against "incestophobia"? (sarcasm)
From the quote, it appears that divorce is out of the question, too.
I missed hearing that.
I do not know if those groups are in favor of incest. I am not, however. I simply do not see the point of laws making such behavior between consenting adults illegal. I would certainly shun anyone in such a relationship, even if it was legal.
Side note it is obvious that you are also an anarchist.
I am not an anarchist. I have no idea where you got that idea.
Apparantly all behavior among consenting adults is ok with you.
More or less, with the caveat that it needs to be private.
The hidden little secret that you dont get (you probably dont have kids or were absent in their rearing) is that all this behavior affects them.
How does private behavior between consenting adults affect kids? If the behavior remains behind closed doors, how will kids even know about it?
No rules, no constraints no limits.
Please point to where I said that.
Everything is ok as long as it makes you feel good.
Please point to where I said that.
Dont expect a functioning society for very long -
I have no idea whether this is true or not, buit it is irrelevant since I have not proposed any such society. Please re-read my comments.
radical islam looks for societies like this that have instituted PC intolerant tolerance - because they know that you would never restrict their ability to persecute you.
I cannot parse this statement. What are you trying to say here?
We also don't want the kids to look like that banjo player in "Deliverance".
Not since Sleepy Ginsburg left. (Not a wise man, just untouched).
He loves the word "fabric". It's a nice generic term that gently redefines ILLEGAL ALIEN.
"We also don't want the kids to look like that banjo player in "Deliverance"."\
Absolutely. Best to all - off to work.
I think you're making an unfounded generalization there. Even most dumb people know what Comedy Central is and means. The Democrats who fantasize about Daily Show/Colbert being real news are just that, fantasizing.
"OK? No, not in my opinion, its a sin." Well so is homosex
"Legal? Yes, if the don't get married." Im not sure that is the case. Depends
"Marriage? No way -not legal and that is a good thing." But according to you it is unAmerican to hide their desires. These are adults. Homos are no different right? They arent hurting anybody? Right?
Its obvious from your answers that you find it appalling that it could happen. But homos should be free to practice it. Dont you find it contradictory? If you can not judge one then you can not judge the other. My argument is that homosexuality is wrong and no different than the adult incestuous relationship (as even you suggest) because evethough each are adults they both lead to the breakdown of our society.
Govt can and does regulate morality. This is the take home message. May not be what you like but without it society would break down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.