Posted on 03/27/2006 2:54:07 PM PST by Irontank
If that's the best the Republican party can do, then I will be writing in my vote.
I guess we'll see won't we?
"He was a loyal patriot who couldn't be bribed. I think you have the wrong POS in mind."
He was a glib big mouth who when the chips were down couldn't think straight.
You and I know he lost almost all supporters after his stupid post 9/11/2001 remarks.
When 3,000 innocent citizens have been murdered by foreigners, you rightly blame the murderers.
I don't need a masters from Libertarian University to know how to think straight.
The ones that companies outsource work to and the immigrants who come here under visas.
I couldn't agree with you more. Ronald Reagan's dead. We have John McCain, Rudy Guiliani, Mitt Romney and George Allen. I guarantee you none of those RINO's will do the job. Allen? Maybe, but when was the last time a Senator got elected? Frankly, I don't know if I want a former Senator as CIC.
Back to my original post (which was tongue in cheek, btw) VOTE REPUBLICAN because that's all there is. The alternative is..., what? Got militia?
Okay, I never said that there were 6 qualified conservatives in the race. I said that there were 6 conservatives and they watered down the message. Bush wasn't one of the six. Bauer, Buchanan, and Keyes were definitely not ready for prime time. Quayle and Forbes were. And frankly, I can't even remember the sixth one, but I do remember (at least) nine candidates, three of whom were Bush, McCain and Dole, who represented the center and left.
Who knows, I don't work for a CEO.
First, I am not a Neocon but you can call me one if it makes you feel bigger. Second bush cut taxes too. Taxes were high as 90% in the fifties and have been trending lower every since. Third numbers are numbers, they don't care about your explanation. 2005 GDP 2.9% 1975 GDP 6%. Thats the facts, you can argue any cause you wish but when you are through the numbers are going to remain the same.
Graham today was one of the few Republicans who voted for Specter's amnesty legislation. I hope the good people of South Carolina are aware of what their Senator ("Republican by day and Democrat by night") is doing.
He also didn't cut one dollar from the year to year funding of any of lbj's "Theft Society" programs. That's after a 49 state win. Not a lot of "R"s that want to do more than talk about cutting spending?
[Bush believes in none of these things. His conservatism, such as it is, is cultural rather than political. Writes Bartlett, Philosophically, he has more in common with liberals, who see no limits to state power as long as it is used to advance what they think is right.]
Right. Our President is a fool liberal who doesn't have the good sense he was born with. What they think is right is one world government and Bush is a supporter like his father, unfortunately.
Thats argument for how the money was spent. The deficit's are still 2.9% Bush 6% Reagan.
Hundreds of thousands take to the streets to defy America's right to defend its own borders, and Bush worries that we conservatives are being "uncivil" which I take as code language that he's calling his own constituency racist.
He's scheduled yet another honeymoon with Vicente in Cancun--
I know one honeymoon that is definitely over.
Yes, we'll see and I hope we're both wrong about McCain. Any field of possibilities where he or Guiliani are the top polling candidates has to mean that the rest of them are so pathetic in contrast that they make these guys appear to be reasonable choices.
Your memory sucks. Republicans controlled the Senate for 6 of Reagan's 8 years.
That is correct and irrelevant. It doesn't negate the fact that the Republican Senate under Reagan also passed the budgets or that Codeograph's memory is wrong.
The elections were already rigged in favor of incumbents but McCain Feingold made sure that would be the case for all time.
Now the elections are rigged in favor of incumbents and the news media. I think the next time I hear one of them touting freedom of the press I'm going to puke. Freedom of the press to do what? Form a cabal and influence public opinion?
I daresay that the founders missed this one. They had no idea that Americans would be so brain dead that they get all of their news from a handful of intellectuals in New York City.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.