Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/23/2006 2:49:57 PM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: My Favorite Headache
But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.

Chairman Ka-Ching! financed the DNC and Bubba in the 1996 campaign... and now they are getting the payoff!

58 posted on 03/23/2006 6:29:44 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCPatriot; onyx; Howlin; Coop; gov_bean_ counter; Solson; 1035rep; Frank_Discussion; Dane; ...

PING for another knee jerk reaction...


59 posted on 03/23/2006 6:38:50 PM PST by Chickenhawk Warmonger (Join the chickenhawk express at www.chickenhawkexpress.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
"U.S. Hiring Chinese Co. To Scan Nukes"

Is the Title of this article incorrect as posted on FR?
The actual title is "U.S. Hiring "HONG KONG" to scan nukes".
Maybe the mods should change it so freepers can find the thread for discussion.
68 posted on 03/23/2006 7:01:06 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All


5. World Class Container Port - & More!
The Hutchison Port Group now owns 50% of Freeport Harbour and Freeport International Airport. The Harbour has been transformed from a Cruise Liner & Roll-on/Roll-off Port to a magnificent and modern container port. The port, with hard standing for 10,000 containers (including 150 refrigerator spots) and the most sophisticated Straddler and Ship-to-Shore cranes, is able to handle 400,000 container moves per annum. Freeport Harbour has been dredged to 47' at low tide, giving it a considerable advantage over Eastern Seaboard ports. As the Hutchison Group already owns 14 container ports worldwide, Freeport os expected to accrue significant benefits. Hutchison has also acquired 50% of Freeport International Airport, and plans are in hand to develop it for airfreight handling in conjunction with the container port. AND THEN.......HUTCHINSON PLAN TO BUY THE LUCAYAN HOTEL, STRIP/UPGRADE AND BUILD 1335 **** HOTEL ROOMS - INVESTING $150,000,000.


72 posted on 03/23/2006 7:15:23 PM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

Well now, isn't that special? This is the same Chinese company that now has the Long Beach Naval Base, the Panama Canal, the largest port in the Bahamas, and it's the same company that Clinton was taking money from! Now we're going to trust them to scan for nuclear bombs? Riiiiiight! I wonder how many other traitors in DC are in bed with them. Greed and the lust for power have caused the sellout of America!!


82 posted on 03/23/2006 10:37:26 PM PST by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

I acknowledge that I know nothing about port security, but I am still concerned about contracting out important security operations that are supposed to protect the US to foreign countries, especially foreign countries that we do not have long-term, friendly relationships with. Also, do we really want China or the Philippines to have access to this "sophisticated U.S. radiation detector"? (Note that this is the "first time a foreign company will be involved in running a ... U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.")

It will be interesting to see how much these two contracts have been "vetted" in light of the DPW deal. It would seem that the Bush administration would have dotted all the "i"s and crossed all of the "t"s. I suppose we'll find out because Schumer is quoted in the article and does know about at least the Chinese transaction. So, I'm sure he'll follow up and we'll hear about it again.

I am cognizant of the fact that the MSM is probably exploiting these kinds of deals to make Bush and Republicans look bad. However, my reaction is not "knee-jerk". I'm more concerned about national security than Democrats vs Republicans.


83 posted on 03/23/2006 10:59:54 PM PST by unfortunately a bluestater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
W needs to have some special ordnance ops people in the Whitehouse that ferret out these land mines before they get laid and successfully defuse them before they blow up. The RATS have found a goldmine of opportunities with this kinda stuff and are going to unload these one week after another leading up to the November elections in hopes of beating the GOP to the punch on national security.
84 posted on 03/23/2006 11:12:18 PM PST by Rockitz (Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

What I do not understand is why we need Communist China scanning our ships. IT really does sound like having the fox guard the henhouse. Also, has America fallen so far with taxes, regulations, and just plain government bureaucracies that we have no American Company to do this? Who is looking our for American Jobs? Dell just reported that it will be hiring 3,000 employees IN INDIA. In the USA all we here are layoffs, jobs going overseas, and now who we are selling off security issues to our enemies. Why are these contract NO BID? It sounds as though we have a “Godfather” in the Whitehouse, giving away American gems for his own enrichment. Can’t we get good negotiators who will help us and not worry about their next job with those they are negotiating with?
Both President Bush and the US Congress are selling out the American people, repenting foreign interests, and I am not reading or hearing these stories in so called mainstream news.


90 posted on 03/24/2006 12:32:29 AM PST by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

What’s the deal with the no-bid contracts?


95 posted on 03/24/2006 3:43:33 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

I don't fear this deal either, but for different reasons than the Dubai deal.

However, how hard would it be to get an untrained but cleared american to take a full-time assignment in the bahamas?

They don't have to be trained, the equipment operates itself. Surely the port company doesn't care about that one job, and if they do the customs guy can sit shotgun.

Of course, it will be hard to get to this simple, common-sense solution because the argument will turn to a screaming match about chinese taking over our ports again.

Congress, if it wasn't too busy sending political messages to save it's sorry behind, could have passed a law a few weeks ago requiring a U.S. government employeee to be full-time at every US port terminal run by a foreign company, and at every foreign port terminal loading cargo bound for the U.S.

It wouldn't make us safer, but then we wouldn't have to put up with Chuck Schumer lying (I wonder if Eller wants this contract?) and stupid republican lawmakers trying to out-schumer schumer.

I don't think I'll get any more involved in this discussion, as if all the revelations of the last two weeks about how the opponents to the Dubai deal were taken for a ride haven't changed anybody's opinions, nothing I say will.


97 posted on 03/24/2006 6:13:06 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
The Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration is negotiating the Bahamas contract under a $121 million security program it calls the "second line of defense." Wilkes, the NNSA spokesman, said the Bahamian government dictated that the U.S. give the contract to Hutchison.
"It's their country, their port. The driver of the mobile carrier is the contractor selected by their government. We had no say or no choice," he said. "We are fortunate to have allies who are signing these agreements with us."

The headline is completely dishonest.

102 posted on 03/24/2006 6:57:41 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
About a dozen years ago I worked for a company in the LA area that was owned by a Hong Kong corporation. I was only there a couple of months but I learned one thing. These people are rabid capitalists. Anyone from Hong Kong somehow knows how to get any product made or manufactured. Everyone wants a piece of the deal. They drive, drive, drive to close a deal and make a cut. The only ideology they have is "success." Everything is about success. The best compliment they can bestow on anyone is that they are successful.

This deal does not concern me in the least. The Chicoms simply can't control them and their business dealings. Their need to succeed and profit runs too broad and too deep.

I also believe that this capitalist trend will silently sweep all of China before long. It will be a silent revolution. You really have to spend a few months working with them to get an appreciation for what I'm talking about.
117 posted on 03/24/2006 10:01:50 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

Why can't they just get a West Virginia Company??


120 posted on 03/24/2006 10:26:10 AM PST by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
What a non-issue.

Foreign countries scan containers at their own ports. If the Bahamas government wants to hire professionals more capable than its own government employees, it should be applauded.

124 posted on 03/24/2006 11:05:48 AM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

If they let a nuke through they might just lose the contract! Wow, that should make 'em think!


126 posted on 03/24/2006 12:00:38 PM PST by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson