Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. To Scan Nukes
AP ^ | 3-23-06 | TED BRIDIS

Posted on 03/23/2006 2:49:54 PM PST by My Favorite Headache

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bahmmas, Panama, they wanted to be in LA. This outift is closely affiliated with the PLA, and IMHO, is a front organization for them. Of course, in their communist government you could (and probably should) consider the same thing for almost any major commercial player.

I believe it is a mistake to give them any level of access to our sophisticated detection equipment. Armed with any significant data or information, they would be in a better position to defeat it at some point in the future.

Particularly given the Pentagons's assessment of China in its last annual report, this is not a good move at all. China should be treated in the same manner that Reagan treated the Societ Union. They are the evil empire of our day, and given their economic position, they have the potential of being a much greater threat, IMHO, than the Soviets were.

101 posted on 03/24/2006 6:54:42 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
The Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration is negotiating the Bahamas contract under a $121 million security program it calls the "second line of defense." Wilkes, the NNSA spokesman, said the Bahamian government dictated that the U.S. give the contract to Hutchison.
"It's their country, their port. The driver of the mobile carrier is the contractor selected by their government. We had no say or no choice," he said. "We are fortunate to have allies who are signing these agreements with us."

The headline is completely dishonest.

102 posted on 03/24/2006 6:57:41 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
Saying it raises questions is not enough. Where was he on TV, pounding on the table, screaming and hollering.

Chucky went absent when he was most needed.

103 posted on 03/24/2006 7:39:03 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
>The MSM knows how to play conservatives like a fiddle to foment unrest within our ranks

In a perverse way,
a lot of Freepers will be
thrilled when Hillary

moves to the White House.
Then their paranoia and
free-floating terror

will have clear focus.
This business of trembling at
what good guys do sucks . . .

104 posted on 03/24/2006 7:47:53 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Nah, we'll dust off China economically in the long run. There's a whole new generation of technology products being developed right now, mainly in American companies.

Taiwan will ultimately decide to buy those destroyers and subs from us. So China will be unable to conquer them, simply because Taiwan is an island nation and ships with big holes in their sides sink rapidly.

God is still in control, and evil will still be defeated in the long run.

105 posted on 03/24/2006 8:05:43 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Good post. This AP article is a bad joke. On the subject of national security, rated on a scale of 1-10, the Bush Administration is about a 8.7, while the Clinton Administration was an epic disaster for America and I give them a 1.5 rating.


106 posted on 03/24/2006 8:08:06 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I don't think that's an issue because the operators cannot see the output from the scanner, so they have no way of knowing what kind of shielding can defeat it. Our people figured this out when they designed the scanners.
107 posted on 03/24/2006 8:11:17 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
National security people in the Bush Administration are generally very smart. You just have to dig for information to get the whole story, because the MSM is now trying to slant these stories to make the Bush Administration look bad. It's time to start reviewing MSM stories and looking for outright fabrications.
108 posted on 03/24/2006 8:13:43 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm thinking that a RICO lawsuit in response to an outright fabrication by the MSM could have some postitive effects.
109 posted on 03/24/2006 8:16:31 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
There's a whole new generation of technology products being developed right now, mainly in American companies.

Please, elaborate on this.

110 posted on 03/24/2006 8:41:57 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
I don't think that's an issue because the operators cannot see the output from the scanner, so they have no way of knowing what kind of shielding can defeat it. Our people figured this out when they designed the scanners.

They don't have to see the output from the scanner.
They just need to see the reaction from Customs.
The box makes it to its destination or it doesn't. Duh
111 posted on 03/24/2006 8:56:48 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

We know how to disguise the reaction by Customs so as not to give any information to the Chinese screeners. It would look like there's no reaction, but then customs sezes the container in another area out of view of all foreign workers. Duh.


112 posted on 03/24/2006 9:38:28 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

Oh geez, where do I start? Well I need to do some research into the Tech sector anyway for my business. I haven't been paying enough attention to technology R&D lately. I'll try to get back to you with a good answer in 2-3 weeks. Hope you can wait that long. One new product I have read about lately is televison over IP (internet). Cisco is working hard on this "monster application" and it should be in your town within a year or two.


113 posted on 03/24/2006 9:41:13 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
An even better answer is this: I believe we're just talking about sealed shipping containers here that the screeners do not open and inspect. They just scan the sealed containers. So the screeners would have no idea what kind of shielding is being used to shield nuclear material. Customs could just seize a sealed container and the screeners would have no idea why it was seized. They would probably be thinking..."must be drugs in there."

If we seize an open contaner after it's inspected, then we would need to do that out of view of foreign workers.

114 posted on 03/24/2006 9:47:23 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
Oh geez, where do I start? Well I need to do some research into the Tech sector anyway for my business. I haven't been paying enough attention to technology R&D lately. I'll try to get back to you with a good answer in 2-3 weeks. Hope you can wait that long. One new product I have read about lately is televison over IP (internet). Cisco is working hard on this "monster application" and it should be in your town within a year or two.

What prevents China from taking whatever we develop in the US in advanced technology and appropriating it? I think the point now has been reached where nothing can be kept from them.

115 posted on 03/24/2006 9:50:37 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

The last line said more than "duh".

The box reaches its destination or it doesn't. Duh

The Chinese just have to have their people in a position to know if the goods reached point of sale. Don't even have to directly handle it.


116 posted on 03/24/2006 9:52:05 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
About a dozen years ago I worked for a company in the LA area that was owned by a Hong Kong corporation. I was only there a couple of months but I learned one thing. These people are rabid capitalists. Anyone from Hong Kong somehow knows how to get any product made or manufactured. Everyone wants a piece of the deal. They drive, drive, drive to close a deal and make a cut. The only ideology they have is "success." Everything is about success. The best compliment they can bestow on anyone is that they are successful.

This deal does not concern me in the least. The Chicoms simply can't control them and their business dealings. Their need to succeed and profit runs too broad and too deep.

I also believe that this capitalist trend will silently sweep all of China before long. It will be a silent revolution. You really have to spend a few months working with them to get an appreciation for what I'm talking about.
117 posted on 03/24/2006 10:01:50 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Thanks, I was sure they were doing something at the canal.


118 posted on 03/24/2006 10:15:14 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
God is still in control, and evil will still be defeated in the long run.

My dad, a Baptist minister early in his life always said, God helps those who help themselves!!!

119 posted on 03/24/2006 10:19:19 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Why can't they just get a West Virginia Company??


120 posted on 03/24/2006 10:26:10 AM PST by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson