Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

V for vapid and vile (Michael Medved
Jewish World Review ^ | March 22, 2006 | Michael Medved

Posted on 03/23/2006 9:20:32 AM PST by beaversmom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: DJtex
My biggest complaint about the movie as entertainment is how impossible it is to identify with a person in a mask for the whole picture. It's creepy and cold and alien--sort of like watching a robot.

in a comic book it was a great device...in a movie less so.
61 posted on 03/23/2006 11:23:46 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Borges
He gives away the ending!

The protagonist is dressed as Guy Fawkes. Of course he's going to blow up Parliament.

62 posted on 03/23/2006 11:26:33 AM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
I wonder how that plays here in terms of name recognition. Overheard at one screening was the following exchange: "Dude, what does Vendetta man?" "I dunno"
63 posted on 03/23/2006 11:28:56 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
The Wachowski brothers, who previously made the "Matrix" films, feel such hatred for the film's fictional government — described as both conservative and Christian, persecuting Muslims and gays — that they treat V's anti-government mayhem as heroic.

Persecuting? Is that what they call it when you round them up, put them in camps, and kill all of them? The government isn't conservative, it's a fascist state that rules through fear. I don't know why Medved's defending it, but I think that he's probably bashing a movie that he hasn't really seen.

64 posted on 03/23/2006 11:33:19 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
The protagonist is dressed as Guy Fawkes. Of course he's going to blow up Parliament.

I'm kind of surprised that Guy Fawkes Day never became part of American tradition. Fireworks and burning a Catholic in effigy sounds like something the Puritans would have enjoyed.

65 posted on 03/23/2006 11:34:41 AM PST by Potowmack ("Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Potowmack
At the time, they probably disliked the Anglican Church almost as much as Fawkes did.
66 posted on 03/23/2006 11:38:21 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I wonder how that plays here in terms of name recognition

Given the state of general historical ignorance, probably not well. People take crap like Stone's "JFK" to be factual, and that stuff happened within living memory. I doubt even most British know what Guy Fawkes did in any deeper sense than the average US citizen knows what Benedict Arnold actually did.

67 posted on 03/23/2006 11:43:54 AM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

I don't think any quasi intelligent person takes a piece of historical fiction like JFK to be factual. But a lot of people don't know who the VP is much less Benedict Arnold or Guy Fawkes.


68 posted on 03/23/2006 11:47:41 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

LOL. He should just get Domino Rally. It was way easier to set up.

But he is part Edmond Dantes. The Count of Monte Cristo spent a lot of time doing unnecessary things as well. I just finished CMC and was disappointed. It was okay, but not the masterwork I had been led to believe.


69 posted on 03/23/2006 12:03:45 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (History is a work in progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
I don't know why Medved's defending it, but I think that he's probably bashing a movie that he hasn't really seen.

What is he defending?

hasn't really seen

Hasn't really seen as in "he was sleeping when the movie was playing" or as in "he wasn't even in the movie theater".

70 posted on 03/23/2006 2:54:14 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LegionofDorkness
Was Star Wars a "pro-terrorist" movie? No. (Although a lot of innocent independent contractors on the 2nd Death Star were blown up by rebels)

You know, any contractor willing to work on that Death Star knew the risks. If they were killed, it was their own fault!

71 posted on 03/23/2006 3:09:26 PM PST by MikeD (You can tell by the lines I'm reciting/I've seen that movie too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0238380/


72 posted on 03/23/2006 5:10:25 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Yes, he is a terrorist. But he is a terrorist against a guy who is basically Hitler......


I liked the movie.


73 posted on 03/25/2006 9:14:13 PM PST by silentstriker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson