Skip to comments.
GOP Irritation At Bush Was Long Brewing
Washington Post ^
| Friday, March 17, 2006
| Jim VandeHei
Posted on 03/16/2006 11:56:08 PM PST by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 601 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Why do you torture yourself, EV?
This is what you said at 2:30 this afternoon, on this very thread:
---------------------------------------------------
To: Reagan Man
That was an excellent article. Unusual for the WashPost. No kidding.
Here's the thing, though: Reading this article it's easy to see that it's really the 'moderates' (read: liberals) who are trying to make hay out of the President's current difficulties.
They accurately describe the problems, and then offer their insane fix: more liberals advising the Commander-in-Chief. The right course for George W. Bush? Fire Andy Card and everyone who comes close to thinking like him. Then hire every hardcore conservative he can apologize enough to to gain their support. :-)
Then govern like a conservative for two years.
"No matter how far he gets, at least he'll get to have a whole lotta fun! LOL...
12 posted on 03/17/2006 2:27:39 AM CST by EternalVigilance ("After all I've done for you people!!!" -John McCain) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
----------------------------------------------
Contextual note: I did not increase the font size on the gigle at the end of your post.
To: Dolphy
Did you get an answer to what would happen if all illegals were deported?
Or, since we have grandchildren at this house, the question we refer to as the "And then what" question.
362
posted on
03/17/2006 10:02:38 PM PST
by
Howlin
("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
To: onyx
You're quite welcome. :-)
363
posted on
03/17/2006 10:02:55 PM PST
by
COEXERJ145
(Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
To: COEXERJ145
I know it took time and research.
Your work is appreciated very much.'
Thanks again!
364
posted on
03/17/2006 10:04:21 PM PST
by
onyx
(IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
To: COEXERJ145
365
posted on
03/17/2006 10:05:02 PM PST
by
Howlin
("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
To: Wombat101
And you'll be taking that day laborer job that comes with below-minimum wage payscale and no dental plan excatly when? If there are no takers, perhaps the employer might have to pay a decent wage and provide some benefits, eh?
Do you understand that the increasing supply of labor from the south, sought after in our trade agreements of recent decades, drives down wages for American citizens?
Or have you repealed the law of supply and demand?
Do you want a wage race for the bottom with China?
The fact that the illegals are operating outside the system only exacerbates the problem.
366
posted on
03/17/2006 10:05:03 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("After all I've done for you people!!!" -John McCain)
To: onyx
No,my premise is not faulty at all. Apply some brain cells to it:
If the government reports virtually full employment in this country, it is reporting virtually full employment for LEGAL CITIZENS or foreigners given permission to work, because illegal aliens are not supposed to be given jobs, correct?
Therefore, the government is only counting those legally allowed to work, no? Since it obvious that many illegal aliens ARE working, and they aren't being counted, then either the employment figures are cooked by the government or the people who supply the government with the figures.
367
posted on
03/17/2006 10:05:05 PM PST
by
Wombat101
(Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
To: EternalVigilance
principled conservative leaders Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.
368
posted on
03/17/2006 10:06:07 PM PST
by
Once-Ler
(Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them.)
To: Howlin
Yep, and when they were called on it all they did was start the using crap of accusing others of being "piece of sh*t quislings" or other such garbage.
As a side note, I bet if I called one of them that same name, I'd get suspended for a week.
369
posted on
03/17/2006 10:06:48 PM PST
by
COEXERJ145
(Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
To: Wombat101
370
posted on
03/17/2006 10:07:21 PM PST
by
onyx
(IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
To: A Citizen Reporter
371
posted on
03/17/2006 10:07:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
To: A Citizen Reporter
BTTT!
Excellent.
Nailed again.
372
posted on
03/17/2006 10:08:16 PM PST
by
onyx
(IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
To: EternalVigilance
perhaps the employer might have to pay a decent wage and provide some benefits, eh? Well, I knew your first name was Tom, but I didn't know you last name was Hayden.
373
posted on
03/17/2006 10:09:01 PM PST
by
Howlin
("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
To: EternalVigilance
I'm sure you wouldn't have posted those graphs, without a soure for the information. Would you EV?
To: Wombat101; onyx
If the government reports virtually full employment in this country, it is reporting virtually full employment for LEGAL CITIZENS or foreigners given permission to work, because illegal aliens are not supposed to be given jobs, correct? oh
Duh on us.
375
posted on
03/17/2006 10:10:13 PM PST
by
Howlin
("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
To: COEXERJ145
You're probably right..........LOL.
376
posted on
03/17/2006 10:11:06 PM PST
by
Howlin
("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
To: Once-Ler
Principled conservatives don't vote for $trillion budgets and blame Dubya for signing them. No they don't. That's why I defended Mike Pence from such arrogant attack. He's been one of the few real proponents of fiscal restraint in Washington.
377
posted on
03/17/2006 10:11:27 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("After all I've done for you people!!!" -John McCain)
To: Once-Ler
Anything noteworthy this man Pence has accomplished in the House? Something that sets him apart from his peers? A masterful piece of "conservative" legislation that he has written and gotten through the committee and passed into law for the President's signature?
This is a serious question.
378
posted on
03/17/2006 10:11:43 PM PST
by
onyx
(IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
To: A Citizen Reporter
379
posted on
03/17/2006 10:12:00 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("After all I've done for you people!!!" -John McCain)
To: Howlin
Well, I knew your first name was Tom, but I didn't know you last name was Hayden. Only you could call someone 'Tom Hayden' for advocating for the market working within the law.
In fact, you are advocating for lawlessness.
380
posted on
03/17/2006 10:14:03 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("After all I've done for you people!!!" -John McCain)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 601 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson